Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authenticating Proxy Server

2008-04-15 Thread Nils Jeppe
On 15.04.2008, at 13:22, Roy Pearce wrote: I have tried using an ssl-enabled authenticating proxy server but this confuses the browser as it attempts to talk http to an https server. Mh, why is this? I don't have experience with mod_auth_radius, but I'd expect it to work similarily to al

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url proxying

2008-04-11 Thread Nils Jeppe
e URL http://myapache/abc/ the redirection works but the url changes so proxying is not working as expected. Any idea? thx --- On Fri, 11/4/08, Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url proxying To: users

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url proxying

2008-04-11 Thread Nils Jeppe
Hello Melanie, I am not sure if the RewriteRule behaviour is identical to ProxyPass od mod_proxy. In mod_proxy, I believe you have to enable ssl connections to the backend with SSLProxyEngine on (or something similar, if my memory fails me), so this might be the issue here as well. Mod_pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Split-brain problem.

2008-04-08 Thread Nils Jeppe
On 08.04.2008, at 09:30, Ch Praveena wrote: While going on with Terracotta article, -- http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/explore/How+Terracotta+Works , For implementing application server clustering, I found this phrase, "Split-brain problem.".. Please let me know about this i

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuration problem

2008-04-07 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Evelyn Wilkerson wrote: I'm sorry, but I have no idea what that means. How do I find out what process is using the port? On Linux, you can use: lsof -i :80 as root and it should dump a list of processes binding on port 80. Other unices will have something similar. I do

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuration problem

2008-04-07 Thread Nils Jeppe
Sounds like some other process is already binding on the port you are trying to use. Find out what it is, and either terminate it or find another port to use (via the listen directive). Best wishes Nils On 07.04.2008, at 17:57, Evelyn Wilkerson wrote: Thanks for your help. I changed it t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule

2008-03-23 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Joshua Slive wrote: Mh, is that new? That particular document is relatively new. But the behavior of mod_rewrite in this regard has not changed for as long as I remember. Ah, QSA appends, and doesn't allow parsing. I've always wanted to parse. Still, you are right, t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule

2008-03-23 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Joshua Slive wrote: Not quite. See: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RewriteQueryString Mh, is that new? - Nils - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule

2008-03-23 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Sam Carleton wrote: The category/fldoid is always going to be present, the p can be changed for other variables, so this is what I came up with, but the 7 is not being picked up by the PHP code: Well - you terminate your rule at .php and then create a new url with empty

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache reverse-proxy config.

2008-03-20 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Venkat Rangan wrote: Is there anything I am missing? Yes. Apache is not able to distinguish between your two virtualhosts, and thus using the first one. Use NameVirtualHost on the IP (or *) in the main part of your config and assign ServerName 's to each of the virtual

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with Rendering Images

2008-03-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Liz Kim wrote: I dont think that is the problem because I can directly access and view the image on the browser when I use the src " http://mysite.com/images/2.tif"; It's only when this src is embedded in a file such as html that it shows up as broken link image. I hate

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jboss 4.2 clustering..

2008-03-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Ch Praveena wrote: Hi Nils.., I am running httpd-2.0.63 version of apache server. Actually, i am getting some FILE NOT FOUND EXCEPTION in apache error.logfile.. and parallely, Jboss 4.2.2 GA is able to run usual.. like http://localhost:/sample/hello.jsp..

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain redirect

2008-03-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Lester Caine wrote: I'm sure it is possible without too much difficulty but what is the best way of doing it? The home.lsces.co.uk and www.lsces.co.uk are currently on different IP addresses but the new hosting is handling that side of things OK, so the home.lsces.co.uk

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jboss 4.2 clustering..

2008-03-17 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Ch Praveena wrote: please look at this issue and respond me at the earliest.. Don't know much about jboss, but I know whoever can help will ask this question, so, let me preempt it and save you some time: you should also tell the list what configuration you're using.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: Fixed it for the /saleslead vs /salesleadv2. What does having or not having the trailing slash change or mean? Apache will match everything to the right side of the statement. So for example /saleslead will also be matched. But if you change it to

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [warn] worker http://some_ip:port/context already used by another worker ?

2008-03-17 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Wilda, Jet wrote: I'm guessing that no one else is running 2.2.8 as a reverse proxy? I am not, but: ProxyPass /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPassReverse /saleslead http://172.17.52.28:8091/saleslead ProxyPass /salesleadv2 http://172.17.52.28:8091/sa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] content being served on the basis on incoming IP

2008-03-13 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Szymon Bakowski wrote: Hmm, thats not exactly what i was thinking and I believe mod _rewrite may not help here as that is a url rewriter and what I am after to serv different content for the same domain based on incoming IP. Ex. person with ip 1.1.1.2 hits domain example

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] content being served on the basis on incoming IP

2008-03-13 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Szymon Bakowski wrote: I was just wondering about in order to find a solution to my problem but haven`t come up with final solution yet: what i am after is to be able to serve the content of different directories after hitting the same IP based on incoming IP. I was thinki

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav, xp professional sp2 errors

2008-03-11 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Julius wrote: my xp machine can mount the dav share, but thats it. cant copy/read or ^^ There's your problem. I have given up on trying to get windows work correctly with webdav. It's very sad, but MS' implementation seems to be incredibly buggy and the be

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP sharing by several web servers and computers

2008-03-11 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Jan Mura wrote: So I put into httpd.conf the 10.0.0 firstly and the Apache started. Now I put into Win Apache the adress of the router 90.177.103.168 and it started but I think it cannot run together with the same adress and port. It is quite IP-Adresses always have to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ErrorDocument not working for HTTP code 413

2008-02-29 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using httpd 2.2.4 with BEA Weblogic plug-in for Apache. I have configured the ErrorDocument to handle HTTP return codes returned by the app. I have set a MaxPostSize attribute on the WLS plug-in to limit the file uploads. When i simulate HTTP s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSI resolve IP to hostname

2008-02-29 Thread Nils Jeppe
Hi Andre, On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, [iso-8859-1] Andre Hübner wrote: PHP and gethostbyaddr or even on console using host i can resolve his IP to his hostename. Is there a explaination why SSI could fail or is he just kidding me? From my side i di not see any errors or mistakes. In theory, it cou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite redirecting multiple domain names to the one name

2008-02-28 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Viv D-F wrote: I figure this is a fairly common problem, but I haven't been able to find any examples of how this is usually done. I'm not convinced that this is best done in the Apache config. Is this done at the DNS instead? There are, I think, three ways to do this.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate's problems

2008-02-28 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Joshua Slive wrote: For example, why are you forcing MSIE to use HTTP/1.0 requests in the first place? MSIE defaults to http 1.0 when using a proxy. This can be changed in its preferences, but of course this requires manual action on the user's part. Best wishes, -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate's problems

2008-02-28 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: No.I didn't set up any proxy before Apache. I access to apache web service directly. Mh? You cc'ed the squid list, that's why I figured it might be a proxy issue. please, it's ie6sp2 with http/1.0 protocal. by default it's http/1.1 protocal. Yes and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate's problems

2008-02-28 Thread Nils Jeppe
/4 gzip-only-text/html BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI \.(?:gif|jpe?g|png)$ no-gzip dont-vary On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, J

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate's problems

2008-02-27 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Nils Jeppe wrote: You do realize that, at least according to the documentation, you can control that behaviour? I somehow doubt that this is a bug, as it would affect a whole lot of people, but of course everything is possible. Please post the relevant part of your

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate's problems

2008-02-27 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: what I said is mod_deflate always send a "Vary: Accept-Encoding" header to clients though it didn't compress that object. this make some browsers have problems. You do realize that, at least according to the documentation, you can control that behaviour?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate's problems

2008-02-27 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: I just think Apache's mod_deflate has a weak point. When client doesn't declare it accept encoding, apache returns an uncompressed object, but for this object mod_deflate also returns a "Vary: Accept-Encoding" header. This make some browsers be confused. In

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate with ie6 with http/1.0 problems

2008-02-27 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, J. Peng wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://home.arcor.de/pangj/ie6withdeflateerror.JPG I can't see any errors here. The request doesn't specify Accept-Encoding so the response is not compressed, but that's not an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cookies in Apache

2008-02-27 Thread Nils Jeppe
Hi Rolf, On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Rolf Kamp wrote: I am running apache 2.2.4 on Red Hat. I need to set 2 cookies, then redirect the request. The redirect is working, but the cookies are not being set. In order to debug this, I wrote a simple Perl CGI that sets 2 Don't have an immediate solution

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule problem

2008-02-19 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ruslan Sivak wrote: for somehostname.com/u/#1 test 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Feb/2008:17:32:41 --0500] [somehostname.com/sid#7680e0][rid#aa10c8/initial] (2) init rewrite engine with requested uri /u/#1 test 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Feb/2008:17:32:41 --0500] [somehostname.com/sid#7680