Hi,
i am currently toying around with my own local WAMP installation and
found out that though everyone tells me relative directory and alias
paths do not work, they DO work!
Unfortunately i am unable to find any information on that behaviour so
that's why i am turning to the mailing list :-)
Hello all,
Hopefully someone can provide guidance or has seen this problem before
since google didn't dredge up anything useful.
During my Win XP build of Apache 2.2.8 using MSCV++ 6.0 I've run across
an issue I can't immediately resolve.
The build fails towards the end of the build when
the default install
location rectified the error. I would assume it does however.
Dan
From: Stusynski, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:22 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 Windows Compile Issue
Alberto García Gómez wrote:
HI fellows:
I in front of this several error. I have an Apache server under windows
and everything is working fine except but this small error when I using
mod_rewirte (under *nix work fine)
snip
this is my vhost server conf:
RewriteLOg
HI fellows:
I in front of this several error. I have an Apache server under windows and
everything is working fine except but this small error when I using mod_rewirte
(under *nix work fine)
this is my vhost server conf:
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80
VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80
ServerAdmin [EMAIL
-
From: Blasdel, Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 01:55 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003
For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install
the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable
Hello,
We have Apache 2.2.6 compiled (our compile not using canned binaries)
with VC++ Express and it is working for Windows XP but we just tried
installing it to Windows 2003 Server and it will not recognize
httpd.exe. If we run it from the command line we get The system
cannot execute the
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
We have Apache 2.2.6 compiled (our compile not using canned
binaries) with VC++ Express and it is working for Windows XP but we
just tried installing it to Windows 2003 Server and it will not
recognize httpd.exe. If we run it from the
Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install
the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the
target server with no luck.
We did try to recompile with VC++ Express and tried to generate internal
manifests for all exes and .so
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to
install
the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the
target server with no luck.
We did try to recompile with VC++ Express and tried to generate
Sander Temme wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install
the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the
target server with no luck.
We did try to recompile with VC++ Express and tried
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003
Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to
install
the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the
target server with no luck.
We did try to recompile with VC
What version of VC++ are you using, 2005?
From: Blasdel, Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:17 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003
Hello,
We have Apache 2.2.6 compiled (our
a different error
on the target machine (The application failed to initialize properly).
-Original Message-
From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 01:28 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003
On Oct
Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install
the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the
target server with no luck.
Windows 2003 has a different permissions model. Are you sure you are either
running command line
Blasdel, Jerry wrote:
Is there a way to tell from the built objects if we inadvertently
compiled for debug or not? We are calling _apacher and then installr in
the Makefile.win.
You had done right. All I can suggest is that VC has a nifty tool named
depends.exe (it has a dll or two it
Victor,
Just to be clear. Are you saying they all end up crashing Apache, or causing
Aache not to gracefully recover from crashes? There are two issues here and
I'd like to know for which FastCGI is a typical solution. We've already been
investigating fcgid as an option.
-Stephen
On 8/13/07,
Sorry, I'm only familiar with what happens on the linux side of things.
What happens on Windows may be different, but if it helps, mod_php will
cause apache processes to segmentation fault after a random amount of load
(usually after 2-3 days). At this point, anything that apache sends off to
php
Greetings,
We have an Apache 2.0.59 server on Windows 2003 running PHP 5.2.3. We are
also running eaccelerator. Sometimes, PHP faults and brings down Apache with
it. Considering this happens a few times a week, it's not the end of the
world. The bad thing is that Apache restarts, the logs show it
On 8/13/07, Stephen Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
We have an Apache 2.0.59 server on Windows 2003 running PHP 5.2.3. We are
also running eaccelerator. Sometimes, PHP faults and brings down Apache with
it. Considering this happens a few times a week, it's not the end of the
Hi,
I do this exact thing on windows 2003. I use autoexecnt to map the drive and
then the alias will work. One think I do notice is that it is a good idea to
install the apache service with a service name down the alphabet. If you leave
the default service name (Apache2) then it does not
Hello,
I've been struggling with a very bizarre Apache problem. I thought I
would post on this in case this is a bug with Apache itself.
I'm running Apache 2.2.4 under WINDOZE. It came as part of the MS4W
mapping package (http://www.maptools.org/ms4w/), all included software
and versions can
Peter Wilkins wrote:
Alias /test/ z:/small/
#try to get access to mapped network drives!
Directory z:/small/
...
just out of curiosity, had you tried
Alias /test //machine/share/small
Directory //machine/share/small
...
instead of an explorer-managed mapping?
Bill
Yes, tried the UNC path as well and same result.
On 5/15/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Wilkins wrote:
Alias /test/ z:/small/
#try to get access to mapped network drives!
Directory z:/small/
...
just out of curiosity, had you tried
Alias /test
Wisconsin Department of Commerce
608-266-1283
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
From: Randall Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:39 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows
Hello, I am wondering if any of you use
I've been running apache on windows (2003, 2000, XP) for the last 4 years. One
server is for
proxying (mod_proxy and OpenSSL) and the other is for running php apps. The
servers get about
5000 visitors daily. There haven't been any serious issues.
My experience is that it's more challenging
One caution for Apache on XP. The licensing for XP limits you to 10
simultaneous incoming tcp connections.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:33 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache
Arthur Kreitman wrote:
One caution for Apache on XP. The licensing for XP limits you to 10
simultaneous incoming tcp connections.
Of course that's the word of the license. Obviously 'what's a connection'
is always interesting, you end up with far more than 10 connections using
Does this mean that an XP box running Apache would be limited to 10
concurrent web browser users? My impression of this was that the
connection limit only applied to the Windows Network connections and not to
http/https/etc...
In fact it is metered by NTLM authentication, if you
Nathan Kellogg wrote:
Does this mean that an XP box running Apache would be limited to 10
concurrent web browser users? My impression of this was that the
connection limit only applied to the Windows Network connections and
not to http/https/etc...
if you don't patch the tcp stack,
Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so
what your experience has been like so far.
Thanks, RL. Fox.
Internet E-mail Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual(s) named. If you are not the named addressee
I have a very light-weight server running under Windows at
http://swiftys.org.uk
The homepage leads nowhere, and I don't advertise the pages on this site. I
use it for CGI scripting and demonstration pages, by invitation only.
Overall I'm very happy with it. It doesn't restart cleanly from the
truly wonderful, those apache guys and gals are great.
latest apache with mod_security2 with php, perl, python (...) modules on win pro
hundreds of thousands of requests per day, complex apps, hundreds of vhosts,
no issues whatsoever, uptime is great, (no abnormal crashes ever)
(which I think
Randall Fox wrote:
Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so
what your experience has been like so far.
Thanks, RL. Fox.
*_Internet E-mail Disclaimer_ *
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual(s) named. If you
Vince Bravdica wrote:
Randall Fox wrote:
Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so
what your experience has been like so far.
Thanks, RL. Fox.
*_Internet E-mail Disclaimer_ *
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the
matt farey wrote:
Vince Bravdica wrote:
Randall Fox wrote:
Hello, I am wondering if any of you use Apache on Windows, and if so
what your experience has been like so far.
Thanks, RL. Fox.
*_Internet E-mail Disclaimer_ *
This message contains confidential information and is
Can Apache 2.0.X for Windows be gracefully restarted?
Using Apache Service Monitor what does the Restart button exactly
do? net stop/start Apache2 sequence, a graceful restart or neither?
Cheers
Júlio Maranhão
-
The
Júlio Maranhão wrote:
Can Apache 2.0.X for Windows be gracefully restarted?
Yes...
Using Apache Service Monitor what does the Restart button exactly
do? net stop/start Apache2 sequence, a graceful restart or neither?
...a graceful restart.
If you use Win32's service manager, of course it's
I've always used the command prompt.apache -k restartORapache -k startORapache -k stopdepending what you need. The -k tells apache to apply the command to the service. Make sure your path statements are correct for this to work OR go to the /apache2/bin/ folder and issue commands.
aaronOn 9/22/06,
Aaron Wagner wrote:
I've always used the command prompt.
apache -k restart
This also happens to cause a graceful by sending user-defined service
control word 128.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
I am hunter, the guy who provides the Apache for Windows with SSL
binaries at hunter.campbus.com. In case you don't know, the files are
hosted from my friend's shared server at brandleadershipmarketing.com.
Last Friday the tech support disabled the apache directory because
someone at
We have managed to configure Apache authenticate against AD with
the following lines in .htaccess:
AuthName Restricted Access
AuthType Basic
AuthLDAPAuthoritative on
AuthLDAPURL ldap://ad.mycompany.com.au:389/dc=mycompany,dc=com,dc=au?sAMAccountNAme?sub?(objectClass=user)
:
Alvin Wong
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:35
PM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Windows
with Active Directory Authentication
We have managed to configure
Apache authenticate against AD with the following lines in
.htaccess
Anyone running Apache on Windows with FASTCGI ?
How many hits per day ? Fast ? Any problems ?
Thanks in advance for your support !
--
Obrigado,
--
Jose Adriano Baltieri - Analista de Sistemas
Every now and again my client is getting the following error messages in
error.log.
Can you please tell me what might be causing this.
FATAL: erealloc(): Unable to allocate 1167360 bytes
[Tue Nov 22 11:16:42 2005] [notice] Parent: child process exited with
status 1 -- Restarting.
[Tue Nov 22
45 matches
Mail list logo
