: 05 October 2020 12:16
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)? [EXT]
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 13:05 Scott A. Wozny
mailto:sawo...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
IMHO, Web Sockets aren't going to get you any real benefit here. The primary
Tha
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 13:05 Scott A. Wozny wrote:
> IMHO, Web Sockets aren't going to get you any real benefit here. The
> primary
>
Thanks, Scott. I do intend to look into the timing.
BTW, this website takes over eight seconds to load, and it uses the same
CGI setup as my other sites:
Sent: 03 October 2020 20:29
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)? [EXT]
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 13:46 Scott A. Wozny
mailto:sawo...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Sounds like a job for AJAX, but before throwing out the baby with the bath
/questions/10377384/why-use-ajax-when-websockets-is-available
From: Tom Browder
Sent: October 3, 2020 3:29 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 13:46 Scott A. Wozny
Sent: 04 October 2020 11:44
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)? [EXT]
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 04:38 Rob De Langhe
mailto:rob.de.lan...@twistfare.be>> wrote:
I simply use (or dynamically construct) a page with iframes, in whic
what you are doing - perhaps an
example URL or two would be useful for us to offer some support...
James
-Original Message-
From: Tom Browder
Sent: 03 October 2020 19:08
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)? [EXT]
On Sat
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 04:38 Rob De Langhe
wrote:
> I simply use (or dynamically construct) a page with iframes, in which each
> iframe gets loaded by a separate CGI results;
>
Hm, I've always thought that iframes were frowned upon in modern practice.
I'll have to read up on them
Thanks, Rob.
FROM: Tom Browder
SENT: October 3, 2020 2:08 PM
TO: users@httpd.apache.org
SUBJECT: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side
includes)?
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:18 Tom Browder
wrote:
I have been using server side includes since I started my websites on Apache
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 13:46 Scott A. Wozny wrote:
> Sounds like a job for AJAX, but before throwing out the baby with the bath
> water I'd seriously consider turning up logging with timestamps on your
> existing CGI and
>
That's a good idea, Scott, I've just been too lazy and debugging CGI is
entirely under your control.
Best of luck,
Scott
From: Tom Browder
Sent: October 3, 2020 2:08 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)?
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:18 Tom Browder wrote:
> I have been us
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:18 Tom Browder wrote:
> I have been using server side includes since I started my websites on Apache
...
> Any suggestions for SSI replacement with a more asynchronous method?
Let me be more specific about the data flow I'm using with the landing
(home) page of my
11 matches
Mail list logo
