Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:39 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:39 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:39 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:56:28 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want the full working code once I clean up the memory problem? It is, after all, GPL, so it would be in good spirit for me to release the modified source. :) Yes please. I haven't thought through whether to incorporate

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:56:28 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want the full working code once I clean up the memory problem? It is, after all, GPL, so it would be in good spirit for me to release the modified source. :) Yes please. I haven't thought through

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:56:28 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want the full working code once I clean up the memory problem? It is, after all, GPL, so it would be in good spirit for me to release the modified source. :) Yes please. I haven't thought through

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html

2006-11-07 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:13:19 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overall, this is an attempt to transcode stuff before mod_proxy_html munges it horribly, as it does not accept windows-1251. Firstly, that's not strictly true of mod_proxy_html. See Question 1 in the FAQ. It probably doesn't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html

2006-11-07 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:13:19 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overall, this is an attempt to transcode stuff before mod_proxy_html munges it horribly, as it does not accept windows-1251. Firstly, that's not strictly true of mod_proxy_html. See Question 1 in the FAQ. It

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html

2006-11-07 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:50:30 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Secondly, isn't windows-1251 just MS's bastardisation of Latin-1? In the lower registers, yes. In the upper ones, no. Because it is really Cyrillyc-1251. Oh, erm, right. Cyrillic. I must've been confusing it with

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html

2006-11-07 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:50:30 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Secondly, isn't windows-1251 just MS's bastardisation of Latin-1? In the lower registers, yes. In the upper ones, no. Because it is really Cyrillyc-1251. Oh, erm, right. Cyrillic. I must've been confusing

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html

2006-11-07 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:49:25 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 questions: I think I'd have to play with that hands-on to figure it out with your attempted configuration. Was that an offer :) If yes, please say so, and shell account will be provided. (As the system is a VM, I will

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-07 Thread mickg
Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via the xmlFindCharEncodingHandler function) to convert from the source encoding to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html, part 2

2006-11-06 Thread mickg
When doing the request for a page that is reverse-proxied, with the configuration: ProxyPass /geser/ http://192.168.17.1/ ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.17.1/ Location /geser/ ProxyPassReverse / CharsetOptions DebugLevel=9 NoImplicitAdd