On 11/10/23 11:26, Ger van Dijck wrote:
On 11/9/23 21:16, Ger van Dijck wrote:
On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote:
While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg :
dnf advised to use skip-broken.
When I want to install (dnf
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:42:59 +
ja wrote:
> From someone on this list?
>
> dnf swap ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allowerasing
>
> Replaces the incompatible stuff in the fedora repos with the "normal" stuff
> from rpmfusion.
I've got that in my notes as one of the first things I do now (after
On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 17:26 +0100, Ger van Dijck wrote:
>
> On 11/9/23 21:16, Ger van Dijck wrote:
> >
> > On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote:
> > > > While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg :
> > > > dnf advised to use
On 11/9/23 21:16, Ger van Dijck wrote:
On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote:
While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg :
dnf advised to use skip-broken.
When I want to install (dnf install ffmpeg) there seem to be problems.
To
On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote:
While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg :
dnf advised to use skip-broken.
When I want to install (dnf install ffmpeg) there seem to be problems.
To get better answers you need to provide
On 8 Nov 2023 at 17:51, Ger van Dijck wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 17:51:19 +0100
Subject:Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem
with FFmeg.
From: "Ger van Dijck"
On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote:
While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg : dnf
advised to use skip-broken.
When I want to install (dnf install ffmpeg) there seem to be problems.
To get better answers you need to provide more details, like what
exactly was the
On 11/8/23 10:02, Harald Labes wrote:
Try dnf install ffmpeg-free. That should work. If you want the full
fledged ffmpeg from rpmfusion.org, install the reposetories from
rpmfusion and try dnf install --allowerasing ffmpeg. But be aware that
many of the original packages of fedora are then
Here is the RPMFusion page advising to replace ffmpeg-free with ffmpeg. It uses
dnf swap.
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Multimedia
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Try dnf install ffmpeg-free. That should work. If you want the full
fledged ffmpeg from rpmfusion.org, install the reposetories from
rpmfusion and try dnf install --allowerasing ffmpeg. But be aware that
many of the original packages of fedora are then replaced by rpmfusion
stuff.
Cheers
Hay Fedora users,
I upgraded Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 0n a Dell laptop N3701 ( more than 10
years old !) without problems.
Great !
and Fedora39 runs perfectly : More Great
On this machine I use Windows 10 Professional (unprotected mode / bios and
uefi discrepancies) and all runs
On 11/1/19 5:34 PM, john.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
The workaround was simple - just add an EFI boot selection to the BIOS
list before all others, and it now boots as expected. As to why the
installer chose to install an EFI image when the machine was not
configured to use EFI, I have filed a bug
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 12:06 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 10/31/19 23:43, Tim via users wrote:
> > You could go back to gparted, and remove your partitions, making it
> > a
> > blank drive.
> .
> Tim:
>
> That is what the Anaconda installerwanted. I created a new "1 TB"
> partition wit gparted
On 10/31/19 23:43, Tim via users wrote:
You could go back to gparted, and remove your partitions, making it a
blank drive.
.
Tim:
That is what the Anaconda installerwanted. I created a new "1 TB"
partition wit gparted and then it went without any problems.It just
popped up the Complete
On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 15:18 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I have been trying to install Fedora 31XFCE Spin. I've spent more
> time at it than I care to admitbut can"t get the Anaconda installer
> to see a clear one terabyte drive. I re-partitioned it with Gparted
> and gave it an ext4 file system.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:33:18 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 10/31/19 16:01, stan via users wrote:
> > Were you trying to install
> > UEFI from a BIOS boot, or vice versa? Won't work.
>
> I'm not sure how that one boots, the last several Fedira's have been
> upgrades. Maybe I should try the
On 10/31/19 16:01, stan via users wrote:
Were you trying to install
UEFI from a BIOS boot, or vice versa? Won't work.
I'm not sure how that one boots, the last several Fedira's have been
upgrades. Maybe I should try the UEFI installer?
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:34:13 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 10/31/19 15:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > Have you tried selecting a Custom layout?
> .
>
> Yes, the alternative is automatic which I believe gives an LVM, not
> what I want.
You configured a / mount point? Were there any warning
On 10/31/19 15:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
Have you tried selecting a Custom layout?
.
Yes, the alternative is automatic which I believe gives an LVM, not what
I want.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
___
users mailing list --
On 10/31/2019 01:18 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have been trying to install Fedora 31XFCE Spin. I've spent more time
at it than I care to admitbut can"t get the Anaconda installer to see a
clear one terabyte drive. I re-partitioned it with Gparted and gave it
an ext4 file system. The problem
.
I have been trying to install Fedora 31XFCE Spin. I've spent more time
at it than I care to admitbut can"t get the Anaconda installer to see a
clear one terabyte drive. I re-partitioned it with Gparted and gave it
an ext4 file system. The problem seems to be that I don't want LVM,
choosing
Boy is a power issue!
My rats nest of power cables for all my power adapters for all the
notebooks on my desk...
The adapter for the new notebook was unplugged and I was doing the
install off of battery. So just before the install finished, it shut
off from not enough electrons. And of
Try to boot on battery only (w/o adapter) and on AC adapter only (w/o battery).
May be this is a power issue since it is able to start booting.
Memory problems usually lead to BSOD, not power off.
21.06.2019, 18:56, "Robert Moskowitz" :
> I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
>
x120e memory is different than the x130e so no shortcut there.
On 6/21/19 2:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 6/21/19 1:36 PM, stan via users wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
Any recommendations on
On 6/21/19 1:36 PM, stan via users wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
Any recommendations on what I can do with this system? I will check
on memory, but otherwise, HELP. Please?
First recommendation
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
> Any recommendations on what I can do with this system? I will check
> on memory, but otherwise, HELP. Please?
First recommendation is relax. The system won't get worse by
I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
I put in the Win10 HD. It starts to boot and the windows logo starts
spinning and the system promptly shuts down.
It may be memory, and I will have to see if I have any matching memory
here (see if it uses the same as my x120e which I
Looks like internal hardware problem. Unplug the power adapter and battery and
then try to remove and install again the drive, memory and other removable
parts.
21.06.2019, 04:18, "Robert Moskowitz" :
> This is really bad. It won't get past the Lenovo logo screen with the
> USB CD/DVD drive
This is really bad. It won't get past the Lenovo logo screen with the
USB CD/DVD drive attached. It shuts down immediately. No listening to
F12. Even without the drive, I can't get it to respond to any keystroke
before shutting down.
Either the boot info is totally hosed from the install
Do you know what is your gpu unit?
Best is if you download liveDVD and try. You like xfce -->
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/30/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-30-1.2.iso
or torrent
I have a refurbished x131e. I pulled the 320G HD and installed an empty
500GB SSD. From a USB SD I started the x64 NetInstall.
In the install process, I set my location (Detroit), changed the host
name, left the drive setup as default. Then I selected a bunch of
software. I selected the
On Thursday 19 November 2015 11:15:01 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > According to Google, several people are having this issue:
> > >
>
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:23 +, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> On Thursday 19 November 2015 11:15:01 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan il.com>
> wrote:
>
> > According to Google, several people are having this issue:
> >
> > $ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux
> > Last metadata expiration check
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > You can try enabling the testing repos but I don't have a good way to
> > check
> > to see if they're there yet.
>
> The usual way is:
>
> dnf
On 11/18/2015 05:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
According to Google, several people are having this issue:
$ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux
Last metadata
According to Google, several people are having this issue:
$ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:14:07 ago on Thu Nov 19 00:32:09
2015.
Error: nothing provides libx264.so.142()(64bit) needed by
avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.x86_64
(Note that this is
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> According to Google, several people are having this issue:
>
> $ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux
> Last metadata expiration check performed 0:14:07 ago on Thu Nov 19
> 00:32:09 2015.
> Error: nothing
Le jeudi 26 juin 2014 à 20:58 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis a écrit :
Hi,
I used to have a weird behavior, with Fedora live install, on some
machines (Slightly old Dell for example) on USB stick, if I generate it
with the fedora tool I can't see any space on the Disk. On the same
laptop if I generate
On 27/06/14 17:56, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/26/2014 06:58 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Jeff,
Thanks very much.
No problem, but my name is Joe, not Jeff. Yes, I know why you got it
wrong, but that doesn't mean that I don't like having my name mangled.
Joe: I get called Ralph or Rolph or
On 06/27/14 16:34, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 27/06/14 17:56, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/26/2014 06:58 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Jeff,
Thanks very much.
No problem, but my name is Joe, not Jeff. Yes, I know why you got it
wrong, but that doesn't mean that I don't like having my name mangled.
Everyone,
I purchased a used (refurbished) Dell Optiplex 755 that came with
Windows 7 installed. I am trying to install Fedora 20, but when I get
to the Installation Destination screen the fedora installer is not
finding any Local Standard Discs, which means I have been unable to
start any
On 06/26/2014 04:47 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
The system boots to Windows without any problem. I was planning on
overwriting the disc and getting rid of the windows product entirely. I
have checked sum the installation disc, and have even created a second
Fedora 20 installation disc and have
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:11:01 -0700
On 06/26/2014 04:47 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
The system boots to Windows without any problem. I was planning on
overwriting the disc and getting rid of the windows product entirely. I
have checked sum the installation disc, and have even created a
On 06/26/2014 06:58 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Jeff,
Thanks very much.
No problem, but my name is Joe, not Jeff. Yes, I know why you got it
wrong, but that doesn't mean that I don't like having my name mangled.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 8 June 2014 23:40, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
It took a while but I remembered that from school. But I admit that I
had to Google search it for reference.
So? The people here are, mostly, ordinary people that try to help
people with problems. Insulting *paid help* is just stupid.
On 8 June 2014 22:54, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4 1/2 hours! I said to
go ahead, and then after about 2 1/2 hours I accidentally aborted it. I'll try
again late tonite.
Hi Doug. Good to hear from you again.
If you are using
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 17:49 -0400, David wrote:
Use a torrent download (the same site has torrent versions). It's
likely
to be faster, not to mention easier to restart partial downloads.
poc
His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would
be
a complete
On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote:
On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system
(Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a
On 6/8/2014 4:54 PM, Doug wrote:
On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote:
On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system
(Windows 8.1 +
On 06/08/2014 05:17 PM, David wrote:
On 6/8/2014 4:54 PM, Doug wrote:
On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote:
On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 16:54 -0400, Doug wrote:
Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage
advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have
the
usual cable connection, and I thought
I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4½ hours!
On 6/8/2014 5:29 PM, Doug wrote:
On 06/08/2014 05:17 PM, David wrote:
On 6/8/2014 4:54 PM, Doug wrote:
On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote:
On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
Trying to
Doug dmcgarrett at optonline.net writes:
Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage
advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have
the usual cable connection, and I thought
I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4½
On 6/8/2014 5:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 16:54 -0400, Doug wrote:
Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage
advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have
the
usual cable connection, and I thought
I'd have the file
On 06/09/14 05:49, David wrote:
His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would be
a complete restart. And a torrent, at this late date, would/could be
slow since the possibility od acctive 'seeds' would/could be small.
Just for the heck of it, I'm re-downloading the
On 6/8/2014 6:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/09/14 05:49, David wrote:
His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would be
a complete restart. And a torrent, at this late date, would/could be
slow since the possibility od acctive 'seeds' would/could be small.
Just for
On 6/8/2014 6:06 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Doug dmcgarrett at optonline.net writes:
Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage
advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have
the usual cable connection, and I thought
I'd have the
On 06/09/14 06:40, David wrote:
I am impressed Ed. Most, in my experience, torrents die quickly due to
lack of seeds. I gave up on torrents when I upgraded from telephone
lines and 56k modems. I have no idea but many, many yeaRS AGO,
FWIW, maybe things have changed againwith more people
On 6/8/2014 6:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/09/14 06:40, David wrote:
I am impressed Ed. Most, in my experience, torrents die quickly due to
lack of seeds. I gave up on torrents when I upgraded from telephone
lines and 56k modems. I have no idea but many, many yeaRS AGO,
FWIW, maybe things
On 06/09/14 07:21, David wrote:
IMHO? Torrents sucked then. And they suck now.
I live in Taiwan. If it were not for torrents I'd be missing some very good
shows.
As for this person? People like *you*? The unpaid helpers here? He
insulted 'you' IMO. If you don't care? You need to make that
On 6/8/2014 7:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/09/14 07:21, David wrote:
IMHO? Torrents sucked then. And they suck now.
I live in Taiwan. If it were not for torrents I'd be missing some very
good shows.
I was not aware of that.
As for this person? People like *you*? The unpaid helpers
On 06/08/2014 06:42 PM, David wrote:
On 6/8/2014 6:06 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Doug dmcgarrett at optonline.net writes:
Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage
advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have
the usual cable
On 06/09/14 08:55, Doug wrote:
BTW: I did not see any checksum information on the download site.
I just took it on faith that it was OK. Up until now, I've always had
good downloads, when I did have a checksum to verify with.
https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify
--
Do not condemn the
On 06/08/2014 08:55 PM, Doug wrote:
OI downloaded the whole thing and burned a DVD. Thanx to the folks
who advised me to get the 64-bit version. I'll install it later
tonite, if
I don't run into any further trouble. When it's installed and running
I'll post back, and if it doesn't install
Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system
(Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition.
Got up past setting passwords for root and user. Then it crashed with
the following message:
***
The following error occurred whil
On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system (Windows
8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition.
Got up past setting passwords for root and user. Then it crashed with the
following message:
On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system
(Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition.
Got up past setting
On 01/19/2014 08:04 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On 01/19/2014 03:37 PM, Doug wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 32 KDE on second hard drive. This drive has
been partitioned with /dev/sdb1 formatted as NTFS, and /dev/sdb5 and
/dev/sdb6
formatted as ext4. The Fedora install disk says there is
Trying to install Fedora 32 KDE on second hard drive. This drive has
been partitioned with /dev/sdb1 formatted as NTFS, and /dev/sdb5 and
/dev/sdb6
formatted as ext4. The Fedora install disk says there is only 2.77MB
available on the disk. What gives, and how do I fix it?
After mounting the
On 01/19/2014 03:37 PM, Doug wrote:
Trying to install Fedora 32 KDE on second hard drive. This drive
has been partitioned with /dev/sdb1 formatted as NTFS, and
/dev/sdb5 and /dev/sdb6
formatted as ext4. The Fedora install disk says there is only
2.77MB available on the disk. What gives, and
The trial version of VMware Workstation 9 expired last night. I bought
a new version but after the expiration I found it would not accept an
entry for a new key so I ran the vmware uninstall app. and installed the
new one from scratch. It starts but only runs to the point where I get
the
On 05/09/13 13:54, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 05/09/13 13:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA:
2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path
/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include for the kernel
On 05/09/13 13:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA:
2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path
/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include for the kernel
3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 is valid. Whoohoo!
On 05/09/13 14:12, Reindl Harald wrote:
you are *not* following the instructions because they are clearly contain these
two curl-commands downloading the patches, if you follwed the first step
cd /tmp to the /tmp directory and the full path is referred by the next steps
curl
On 05/09/13 16:51, Raman Gupta wrote:
On 09/05/2013 03:08 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
However I am still unable to enter the key. It wont even let me type
in the enter key box.
Yeah, I had this problem too. Try this:
sudo /usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware-vmx --new-sn xxx
(from:
On 09/05/2013 03:08 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
However I am still unable to enter the key. It wont even let me type
in the enter key box.
Yeah, I had this problem too. Try this:
sudo /usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware-vmx --new-sn xxx
(from:
Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA:
2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path
/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include for the kernel
3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 is valid. Whoohoo!
2013-09-05T12:32:43.232-05:00| vthread-3| W110:
Am 05.09.2013 19:54, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA:
On 05/09/13 13:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA:
2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path
/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include for the
I am working with a pair of spanking new HP ProLiant ML110 G servers.
Both have the RAID Hot Swap SATA Arrays and I have tried Installation
with the drive arrayed as 1 Logical Drive and as four separated drives
with the same result in both configurations. I have also used the Full
Well, since you've solved it using a real drive, this is a bit late, but, ...
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
On 29/12/12 13:14, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
Is there a way I can
On this computer I have a copy of
Fedora-18-Beta-x86_64-Live-XFCE.iso I would like to
install on another computer. It has a GiGabyte GA-E350N
motherboard which has a recognized problem booting from a
thumb drive. I've used livecreator on
On 12/29/2012 05:04 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Is there a scheme for installing over the LAN connection?
from my bookmarks, this link may do it for you; [watch line wrap]
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
Is there a way I can install without using the USB flash
drive? There is no optical drive in that box. Is there a
scheme for installing over the LAN connection?
Yes, but first you need to make sure that your target
On 29/12/12 13:14, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
Is there a way I can install without using the USB flash
drive? There is no optical drive in that box. Is there a
scheme for installing over the LAN connection?
Yes, but first
Heinz Diehl wrote:
Firefox, built from .srpm from F17-updates repository, fails to install:
This is the error-message which shows up:
Unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox;501bceec:
cpio: Digest mismatch
The package is original Fedora and not altered in any way.
On 04.08.2012, James Wilkinson wrote:
Even though the build was OK, you still might want to do a memtest of
your system.
I solved the problem. The culprit is prelink, which lets parts of the
package clash. Didn't find the related bugreport st once, though, and spent
some hours digging into
Hi,
Firefox, built from .srpm from F17-updates repository, fails to install:
This is the error-message which shows up:
Unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox;501bceec: cpio:
Digest mismatch
The package is original Fedora and not altered in any way. Extracted
it, ran
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:54:28 -0400, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
Bob:
Take a look here:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f16.html
Although this site is for Fedora 16, it worked OK for me on Fedora 17,
and I expect that the new version will be available within the next few
days.
On 01/06/12 18:54, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
Bob: Take a look here:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f16.html Although this site
is for Fedora 16, it worked OK for me on Fedora 17, and I expect that
the new version will be available within the next few days. It's a bit
like a
Is there no VLC for fedora-17?
Yum install vlc results in No package vlc available.
I've messed wit this for a while to no avail, nothing found in
Google has provided a solution. Don't know what I might have done
wrong?.
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box7
On 06/01/2012 10:31 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Is there no VLC for fedora-17?
Yum install vlc results in No package vlc available.
I've messed wit this for a while to no avail, nothing found in
Google has provided a solution. Don't know what I might have done
On 01/06/12 10:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/01/2012 10:31 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Is there no VLC for fedora-17?
Yum install vlc results in No package vlc available.
I've messed wit this for a while to no avail, nothing found in
Google has provided a
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
Ok, well maybe what I need is to get rpmfusion-free installed which
I don't see in my list of yum repos? I haven't been able to get that
either.
http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
--
Suvayu
On 01/06/12 12:07, suvayu ali wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
Ok, well maybe what I need is to get rpmfusion-free installed which
I don't see in my list of yum repos? I haven't been able to get that
either.
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:48:17 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 01/06/12 12:07, suvayu ali wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
Ok, well maybe what I need is to get rpmfusion-free installed which
I
On 01/06/12 13:33, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:48:17 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 01/06/12 12:07, suvayu ali wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
Ok, well maybe what I need is to
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:10:42 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 01/06/12 13:33, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:48:17 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 01/06/12 12:07, suvayu ali wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni,
On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes.
What you've run is not what I've suggested.
[root@box9 bobg]# rpm -e rpmfusion-release-nonfree
rpmfusion-release-free
error: package rpmfusion-release-nonfree is not installed
On 06/01/2012 04:11 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes.
What you've run is not what I've suggested.
[root@box9 bobg]# rpm -e rpmfusion-release-nonfree
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo