Re: network mystery!!??

i wondered if the list just didnt like me! ;) as for the mystery solution, after all the support, I figured a summary was the least i could do... On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 9:45 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 22:55 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 02:41

Re: network mystery!!??

On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 22:55 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 02:41 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > i sent a reply to the question of what was the mystery , > > but I don't see it on the thread did you get it? > > It came through to the list.  If you're reading in gmail, it's > prob

Re: network mystery!!??

On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 02:41 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > i sent a reply to the question of what was the mystery , > but I don't see it on the thread did you get it? It came through to the list. If you're reading in gmail, it's probably doing that thing where it doesn't show messages to your own add

Re: network mystery!!??

i sent a reply to the question of what was the mystery , but I don't see it on the thread did you get it? On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 8:07 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 19/04/2022 07:28, Jack Craig wrote: > > this mystery has been resolved and my server is online. > > Is the solution easy to describe? >

Re: network mystery!!??

On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 12:57 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > I found this nifty tool in the world from some company called > getsignal. it would look at your ports from the outside and tell you > their status. so I keyed in HTTP and Https ports and sure enough from > the Internet they were blocked There

Re: network mystery!!??

Now that my network mystery has been resolved, I thought I would explain my challenges. for this to make sense I need to add a bit of backstory. my problem started about 12 months ago, I had purchased an static IP block from AT&T and the bandwidth package. it was fairly small but it worked wi

Re: network mystery!!??

On 19/04/2022 07:28, Jack Craig wrote: this mystery has been resolved and my server is online. Is the solution easy to describe? -- Did 황준호 die? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists

Re: network mystery!!??

i'll be surprised if there arent a few tweaks still, but i can get back to drone footage capture.. Thx again, ... On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 6:36 PM Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 16:28 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > this mystery has been resolved and my server is online. > > I just tr

Re: network mystery!!??

On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 16:28 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > this mystery has been resolved and my server is online. I just tried. Initially the browser was unable to connect. But after a few retries it could. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 5 16:57:59 UTC 2022 x86_

Re: network mystery!!??

this mystery has been resolved and my server is online. i am profusely grateful for the wisdom of folks on this list including, Ed, Samuel, George, Tim, Gordon, Richard, and Cameron. thanks, jackc... On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:19 AM George N. White III wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 02:47, Gor

Re: network mystery!!??

On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 02:47, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 4/4/22 00:50, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > If you connect the Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the LAN ports > > on the Nighthawk, everything would be on the 192.168.1.x subnet and > > you could use the same SSID on both devices. You would ne

Re: network mystery!!??

On 4/4/22 22:47, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 4/4/22 00:50, Samuel Sieb wrote: If you connect the Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the LAN ports on the Nighthawk, everything would be on the 192.168.1.x subnet and you could use the same SSID on both devices.  You would need to disable the DHCP

Re: network mystery!!??

If I'm reading this thread correctly, your original setup was as follows: - - 108.90.204.76/24 -> gw: 108.90.204.1 / arris BGW210-700 \ - 192.168.1.254/24 (Blackhole-ATT WiFi network) - 108.220.213.126/29 - 108.220.213.121/29 -> gw: 108.220.213.126 / netgear nighthawk \ - 10.0.0.1/24 -

Re: network mystery!!??

On 4/4/22 00:50, Samuel Sieb wrote: If you connect the Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the LAN ports on the Nighthawk, everything would be on the 192.168.1.x subnet and you could use the same SSID on both devices.  You would need to disable the DHCP server on the Nighthawk and most likely

Re: network mystery!!??

Ed Greshko: > I've basically been following, yet ignoring this thread. As the > amount of words make it difficult for understand the > network topology. It would be correct to say that I'm lost. I've felt the same way, I think this is what I can figure out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl4cn_

Re: network mystery!!??

On 4/4/22 12:07, Jack Craig wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:54 AM Samuel Sieb > wrote: If you connect the Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the LAN ports on the Nighthawk, everything would be on the 192.168.1.x subnet and you could use the same SS

Re: network mystery!!??

On 05/04/2022 03:07, Jack Craig wrote: *you can see access from internet to att rtr, nh rtr, switch with 10.0.0.0 lan addrs * * * *https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NIuvNtE9dOyUZeW96D-i3En5e9p_Ggrb/view?usp=sharing* * * *https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mQ3-kYqSEQIKhsFjTTGTuWyRN-kg4WGp/view?usp=s

Re: network mystery!!??

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:54 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > If you connect the Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the LAN ports on > the Nighthawk, everything would be on the 192.168.1.x subnet and you > could use the same SSID on both devices. You would need to disable the > DHCP server on the N

Re: network mystery!!??

On 4/3/22 20:09, Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: > i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing > after att update > the att older modem (pace 5238a

Re: network mystery!!??

On 4/3/22 23:45, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/04/2022 09:02, Samuel Sieb wrote: I'm going to try to coalesce the bits of information from various emails, but it's still mostly blanks... Is the BGW210 connected via DSL or the Optical uplink port? I've basically been following, yet ignoring this t

Re: network mystery!!??

On 04/04/2022 09:02, Samuel Sieb wrote: I'm going to try to coalesce the bits of information from various emails, but  it's still mostly blanks... Is the BGW210 connected via DSL or the Optical uplink port? I've basically been following, yet ignoring this thread.  As the amount of words make

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: > > i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing > > after att update > > the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. > > > > i have a static ip from att in the range 10

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing after att update the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. i have a static ip from att in the range 108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248 , 1

Re: network mystery!!??

On 30/03/2022 04:40, Jack Craig wrote: *i dont have a way to show the network as an image/ diagram as if i post with an included png or jpg, the post is dropped. * You could put your png/jpg on google drive and then make the link to it public and post the link. -- Did 황준호 die? ___

Re: network mystery!!??

> Date: Saturday, March 26, 2022 23:35:31 -0700 > From: Jack Craig > >> > i have a static ip from att in the range >> > 108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248, 108.220.213.121 is the external >> > ip for the server. >> >> But you list two IP addresses from that subnet. Did they actually >> give you two

Re: network mystery!!??

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/28/22 12:10, Jack Craig wrote: > > i needed more wifi service so i bought the nighthawk thinking to cascade > > the NH behind(required) > > arris bgw210700. in last years config, i had all traffic routed through > > the ATT and did port m

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/28/22 12:10, Jack Craig wrote: i needed more wifi service so i bought the nighthawk thinking to cascade the NH behind(required) arris bgw210700. in last years config, i had all traffic routed through the ATT and did port mapping from the internet from static ip external to internal network

Re: network mystery!!??

thx, i was about to ask for recommendations, i'll read this and see what coherence i can bring to this site On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 4:30 PM Go Canes wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Jack Craig > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 7:22 AM Go Canes > wrote: > >> I've been reluctant to co

Re: network mystery!!??

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 23:30, Jack Craig wrote: > > i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. > > i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing > after att update > the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. > Did it come with man

Re: network mystery!!??

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Jack Craig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 7:22 AM Go Canes wrote: >> I've been reluctant to contribute as well, due to not really >> understanding the setup. But given the Cable Modem was replaced, I've >> been wondering if this is as simple as the prior modem b

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:40 PM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:06 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > >> On 27/03/2022 13:57, Jack Craig wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko >> wrote: >> > >> > On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: >> > > after mu

Re: network mystery!!??

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 7:22 AM Go Canes wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:18 AM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 28/03/2022 11:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > Is it really just me? I see various people responding. Do you > actually understand what his setup is? It doesn't make any sense at all

Re: network mystery!!??

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:18 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 28/03/2022 11:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Is it really just me? I see various people responding. Do you actually > > understand what his setup is? It doesn't make any sense at all to me. > > It is not only you. I haven't grasped the set

Re: network mystery!!??

On 28/03/2022 11:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: Is it really just me?  I see various people responding.  Do you actually understand what his setup is?  It doesn't make any sense at all to me. It is not only you.  I haven't grasped the setup either. However, I would note that everything was working for

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/26/22 23:35, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:14 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote: > (internet)---lan connect--- nighthawk>--lan connect-[netgear switch]-- Now we're getting somewhere.  Can you also a

Re: network mystery!!??

On 28Mar2022 08:42, Cameron Simpson wrote: >I'm wondering if you're worrying about routing when you should be >worrying about the port forward. Just to follow up to my own post, here's a description of my home LAN: public-ip-addr NBN-modem 192.168.1.0/24 | --+---+

Re: network mystery!!??

I'm wondering if you're worrying about routing when you should be worrying about the port forward. Routing: can the server ping, say, 1.1.1.1? Can other hosts at various points on your LAN? If so, your routes are just fine. Also, where are your NAT points? There has to be one on the innermost

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:41 AM Tim via users wrote: > Tim: > >> Your ISP may be ignoring pings, many other services in between, and > >> even your own router. > > Jack Craig: > > but why can i traceroute up to my side of the me<-->isp lan > > segment?? > > Because some of the equipment responds

Re: network mystery!!??

Tim: >> Your ISP may be ignoring pings, many other services in between, and >> even your own router. Jack Craig: > but why can i traceroute up to my side of the me<-->isp lan > segment?? Because some of the equipment responds, others don't. If you look back at your first posting (repasted belo

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 15:52, Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 15:15, Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:12 AM Jack Craig wrote:     On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote:     On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote:     >     >     > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 15:15, Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:12 AM Jack Craig wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko wrote: >

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:12 AM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko > wrote: > >> On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko >> wrote: >> > >> > On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: >> > > but srvr

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: > > > but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and > 108.90.204.7

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 15:04, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: > but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and 108.90.204.76. > > still make sense?? I see To test, I want you to

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:53 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: > > but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and > 108.90.204.76. > > > > still make sense?? > > I see > > To test, I want you to make the server a static ip address of > 108.220.213

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 14:40, Jack Craig wrote: but srvr is on 10.0.0.101, att rtr is between 192.168.1.254 and 108.90.204.76. still make sense?? I see To test, I want you to make the server a static ip address of 108.220.213.121 and then connect it to the BGW210-700. It seems the BGW210-700 may

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:06 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 13:57, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: > > > after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and > for genera

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:14 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote: > > (internet)---lan connect--- > nighthawk>--lan connect-[netgear switch]-- > > Now we're getting somewhere. Can you also assign the following IP > addresses from your original email into that

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/26/22 22:57, Jack Craig wrote: (internet)---lan connect---nighthawk>--lan connect-[netgear switch]-- Now we're getting somewhere. Can you also assign the following IP addresses from your original email into that diagram? 10.0.0.101ws.linuxlighthouse.com (internal

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 13:57, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: > after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and for general internet access its fine. > just not working with my configuration...

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: > > after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and for > general internet access its fine. > > just not working with my configuration... > > > > at the moment, trying to find a static ro

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 12:19, Jack Craig wrote: after much wailing and gnashing of teeth, att did send a tech and for general internet access its fine. just not working with my configuration... at the moment, trying to find a static route option for att rtr. static routes on the internal router wont he

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 8:00 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 27/03/2022 02:42, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ed Greshko > wrote: > > > > On 26/03/2022 16:33, Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > >> Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko >: > > >> > > >> ws

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 9:08 PM Tim via users wrote: > On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 11:22 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > i had a remote friend try traceroute to 108.220.213.121 to show the > > trace stopping at 108.90.204.76. > > > > i dont know why it stops short of my server??? > > Things only respond

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 5:27 PM Richard < inbound-lists-fed...@listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > > Date: Saturday, March 26, 2022 11:42:57 -0700 > > From: Jack Craig > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ed Greshko > > wrote: > > > >> On 26/03/2022 16:33, Peter Boy wrote: > >> > > >> >> Am 2

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 11:22 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > i had a remote friend try traceroute to 108.220.213.121 to show the > trace stopping at 108.90.204.76. > > i dont know why it stops short of my server??? Things only respond to pings if allowed to. Thanks to continual hacking attempts, many

Re: network mystery!!??

On 27/03/2022 02:42, Jack Craig wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ed Greshko wrote: On 26/03/2022 16:33, Peter Boy wrote: > >> Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko : >> >> ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 >>

Re: network mystery!!??

> Date: Saturday, March 26, 2022 11:42:57 -0700 > From: Jack Craig > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ed Greshko > wrote: > >> On 26/03/2022 16:33, Peter Boy wrote: >> > >> >> Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko >> >> : >> >> >> >> ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 >>

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:57 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 26/03/2022 16:33, Peter Boy wrote: > > > >> Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko : > >> > >> ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 > >> > >> Now try connecting to http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com/ > > Not surprisingly, the serv

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 1:34 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko : > > > > ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 > > > > Now try connecting to http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com/ > > Not surprisingly, the server is unavailable. After all, this is the OP's

Re: network mystery!!??

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 12:56 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 26/03/2022 14:24, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > So what you see below is normal. Don't sweat it. Here's an example from > > where I'm sitting to a host on a TPG network: > > > > Maybe he should be "sweating it". He has a web server with a publ

Re: network mystery!!??

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:25 PM Cameron Simpson wrote: > I normally don't top post, but there nothing I can meaningfully trim > from your excellent detailed description. So I'm leaving it below. > > To your traceroute, route tracing (IIRC) depends on setting a max hop > count on the outbound pac

Re: network mystery!!??

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:25 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 26/03/2022 10:29, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > > > i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. > > > > i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing > after att update > > the att older modem

Re: network mystery!!??

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:16 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: > > i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. > > > > sample route, ... > > > > 10.0.0.101 ws.linuxlighthouse.com > > (internal IP) 2 packets transmitt

Re: network mystery!!??

On 26/03/2022 16:33, Peter Boy wrote: Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko : ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 Now try connecting to http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com/ Not surprisingly, the server is unavailable. After all, this is the OP's network mystery. Question is, c

Re: network mystery!!??

> Am 26.03.2022 um 08:55 schrieb Ed Greshko : > > ws.linuxlighthouse.com has address 108.220.213.121 > > Now try connecting to http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com/ Not surprisingly, the server is unavailable. After all, this is the OP's network mystery. Question is, can the OP log in to the server

Re: network mystery!!??

On 26/03/2022 14:24, Cameron Simpson wrote: So what you see below is normal. Don't sweat it. Here's an example from where I'm sitting to a host on a TPG network: Maybe he should be "sweating it".  He has a web server with a public IP address. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ host ws.linuxlighthouse.com w

Re: network mystery!!??

I normally don't top post, but there nothing I can meaningfully trim from your excellent detailed description. So I'm leaving it below. To your traceroute, route tracing (IIRC) depends on setting a max hop count on the outbound packets. When the hop count is exceeded, you get back an ICMP error

Re: network mystery!!??

On 26/03/2022 10:29, Jack Craig wrote: i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing after att update the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. i have a static ip from att in the rang

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. sample route, ... 10.0.0.101 ws.linuxlighthouse.com (internal IP) 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1033ms 10.0.0.1