Nope. Why do you think you want them? Or rather, what's wrong with this:
debug = False
def Main():
if debug:
print 'DEBUG is set'
else:
print 'DEBUG is not set'
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Yash Ganthe yas...@gmail.com wrote:
In C# we can code for conditional
Where does IP find the help content for .NET libraries?
I mean, for instance, the output of
help(System.DateTime.ToBoolean)
Does it parse the Help.2 files? If so where does it look
for them? Only under %ALLUSERSPROFILE%\{Program Data}\Microsoft Help?
Regards,
-H.
Hi,
At the moment file.fileno() returns an arbitrary identifier of a python
file rather than a true file descriptor. This is semi-blocking the
Ironclad port of PIL.
Code in PIL gets an integer using fileno() and passes it directly to C
code where a call to write() is made. To fix this one
There's no such thing as a file descriptor number in .NET -- or, for that
matter, in Windows itself! :) (The latter is something of a semantic point,
of course, as a HANDLE serves something of the same role in Win32 as a file
descriptor number does in Unix.)
If you have a FileStream, I think you
Not so: Though admittedly you have to do quite a bit of work to get the
file descriptor into .NET.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bdts1c9x(VS.71).aspx
To clarify - the C library was written to work with Python (not
IronPython) and is not my code.
Thanks,
Tom
Curt Hagenlocher
Ah, that was the function I was looking for.
Sure, the file descriptor exists in the C library under Windows. But the C
library is basically doing exactly the same thing as IronPython is; it's
maintaining the file descriptor number as an abstraction on top of the
HANDLE that the operating system
Agreed. It is certainly possible with some work to get a file descriptor
and pass it to C code.
This is not the problem, however. Ironclad's aim (eventually) is to
allow *arbitrary* C extensions to work with Ironpython without changing
the extensions. Ctypes aim is to allow arbitrary C code
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Tom Wright
tom.wri...@resolversystems.com wrote:
Agreed. It is certainly possible with some work to get a file descriptor and
pass it to C code.
This is not the problem, however. Ironclad's aim (eventually) is to allow
*arbitrary* C extensions to work with
The one form this is available is with the assert keyword. Assert statements
will be removed in optimized code so you don't have the if debug check. But
they won't let you have the else branch.
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of
I think I understand the motivation pretty well; what I'm saying is that I
don't see that this is possible. IronPython has no access to the table
being used by the C library to map between Windows HANDLEs and clib file
descriptors, so we can't return a clib-compatible fd.
Even if we were to
It seems clear now, thank you.
Reading DocBuilder.cs:GetXPathDocument(..) I assume that if I want
to let our users to be able to get IP console help on our own C#
libraries, we can place the XML docs in a culture subdirectory under
the DLLs install directory, right?
This is generated from the
Presumably CPython is linking against msvcrt and is using the C abstraction
rather than calling the Win32 APIs which return handles directly.
As Curt said the biggest problem for us is that .NET does not expose C file
descriptors. Therefore we could fix this by P/Invoking out to msvcrt. For
If you have only one version/culture, I believe you can just place the XML
doc in the same directory as the DLL.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Hernán Martínez Foffani
hernan.marti...@ecc.es wrote:
It seems clear now, thank you.
Reading DocBuilder.cs:GetXPathDocument(..) I assume that if
I guess I'm too much of a purist when it comes to managed code. But it
would make me sad to P/Invoke by default for this purpose, even if Mono
compatibility is the only real counterargument I can muster.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
Presumably
I have a Python script that creates a class within it. This Python class
is derived off of a class, or interface, I made in C# - something like:
class MyClass(Test.MainForm.IScript):
...
Now, back in C#, I have gotten access to MyClass by:
object myclass = someScope.GetVariable(MyClass);
2008/12/15 Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com
Presumably CPython is linking against msvcrt and is using the C abstraction
rather than calling the Win32 APIs which return handles directly.
As Curt said the biggest problem for us is that .NET does not expose C file
descriptors. Therefore we
Hi Jeff,
Probably the easiest way of doing this is to define a Python function
that uses issubtype. You can use this as a delegate from the C# side
(warning untested):
ScriptScope scope = engine.CreateScope();
ScriptSource imports = engine.CreateScriptSourceFromString(from System
import
2008/12/16 Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk:
Probably the easiest way of doing this is to define a Python function that
uses issubtype. You can use this as a delegate from the C# side (warning
untested):
You mean issubclass...
--
Seo Sanghyeon
You should call PythonOps.IsSubClass and pass in the PythonType and the
interface you want to compare it with. The interface can be either a .NET type
object or another Python type object (or a tuple, etc...)
The not raising on missing functions is a feature :) You could build a
meta-class
Can you open a feature request on CodePlex? It's certainly an interesting idea
to ponder and I'm leaning towards it but there's lots of details to be gotten
right.
Do you know if this needs to work w/ sockets as well? (There's also the
question of can we make it work with sockets? :))
(Dino clearly meant this to be a reply to the other thread with respect to C
file descriptors. :)
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
Can you open a feature request on CodePlex? It's certainly an interesting
idea to ponder and I'm leaning towards it but
Dino Viehland wrote:
(now I’ve replied to the correct thread…)
Can you open a feature request on CodePlex? It's certainly an
interesting idea to ponder and I'm leaning towards it but there's lots
of details to be gotten right.
Do you know if this needs to work w/ sockets as well? (There's
I think this behavior is currently by design because we're using sys.meta_path
which does take precedence over the built-in modules. We could switch to using
sys.path_hooks in 2.1 or 3.0 if the consensus is this behavior in undesirable
(which would also give control over when pre-compiled
Dino Viehland wrote:
I think this behavior is currently by design because we’re using
sys.meta_path which does take precedence over the built-in modules. We
could switch to using sys.path_hooks in 2.1 or 3.0 if the consensus is
this behavior in undesirable (which would also give control over
Sounds waaay too easy :P.
In the long run, I'd prefer that we implement only the C part of these
modules and share the Python part with CPython. But this is not only a
potentially breaking change, it also would require modification to the
standard library for at least the socket module.
On Mon,
This looks like a problem in quite a few of our csproj files. Could you
open up a bug report on CodePlex for this?
Thanks,
-Curt
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Seo Sanghyeon sanx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, now I am trying to use xbuild (open source implementation of
MSBuild language) to
Yeah, it's funny, I thought we were supposed to have done that for at least
some of them.
Maybe these were just missed, but I agree we should definitely do at least that.
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf
I've actually looked at this not too long ago and I think your proposal of
calling the Invariant functions is the correct solution. I was looking at a
few things: This bug http://bugs.python.org/issue1528802, the 3.0 decimal.py
module, and also just using Turkish I at the command prompt. If
28 matches
Mail list logo
