Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:00, Vincent Massol wrote:
I'd like to see the report registration mechanism untied from the site
plugin so that any plugin wishing to use it can. Once this is done, all
plugins web site generation plugins will be equal.
It's been suggested bef
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Are you actually confirming you believe it's an overkill even ofr
jakarta commons ?
Absolutely it's overkill. Additionally if I ever made a live site tool
for Maven I would personally never use anything Cocoon-based. That's my
preference and as such carries some weight around
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:00, Vincent Massol wrote:
> I'd like to see the report registration mechanism untied from the site
> plugin so that any plugin wishing to use it can. Once this is done, all
> plugins web site generation plugins will be equal.
It's been suggested before, I think when Berin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 November 2003 21:51
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
>
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:59, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
>
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:54, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> >>What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not
> >>collaborate?
> > Forrest is massive overkill for most sites, additionally it barely
> >
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:59, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 30 November 2003 20:41
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
> >
> > On Sun,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 November 2003 21:14
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
> > In any case, Maven has an open architecture and Forrest has a Ma
Vincent Massol wrote:
In any case, Maven has an open architecture and Forrest has a Maven
plugin. That's cool. Users can choose to use whichever they prefer.
Mmmh, is that not a Forrest plugin for maven ?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=105438035409490&w=2
I am a bit unclear on
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 November 2003 20:41
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
>
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > What am I missing? This is sounding
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not
collaborate?
Forrest is massive overkill for most sites, additionally it barely
worked when we started Maven and as far as I know is still rather
unwield
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 8:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
>
>
> >
> >
> > Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> > > An alternative would be to actually consider a complete notion of skin.
> > > And this is probably
What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not
collaborate?
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 8:58 AM
Su
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
An alternative would be to actually consider a complete notion of skin.
And this is probably going to happen very soon I think... xdoc
implementors, hasn't it already been thought about ? With the cool
download mechanism of maven, it really looks to be something we could
Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/11/2003 09:22:27 AM:
> Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote:
> > degenerates quickly into the sort of rambings I dispise.
>
>
> So, is there really someone out here that sort of thinks in terms of the
> product instead of thinking in this gen
Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote:
degenerates quickly into the sort of rambings I dispise.
So, is there really someone out here that sort of thinks in terms of the
product instead of thinking in this general undebatable effect of a logo...
To me, we need to document sufficiently the pr
* Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-26 14:22]:
> Peter Bright wrote:
> >The Chinese government is responsible, in one way or another, for
> >probably around 35 million deaths between 1949 and the present day;
> >whilst many millions of these deaths were attributable not to malice
> >as s
* Jim Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-25 16:01]:
> A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> http://projects.walding.com/powered/
>
> propaganda or feather?
>
> +1 feather
I don't want to respond to anyone in particular (except for the fool
who envoked the halocaust) because
* John D Taylor (ROE) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-26 11:57]:
>
>
> Jim Crossley wrote:
> > A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> > http://projects.walding.com/powered/
> >
> > propaganda or feather?
>
> +1 propaganda
>
> Much more striking, and because most non-US citizens
+1 propaganda.
We're not talking politics, we're talking graphical imagery. If you're
offended by something as simple as some old-fashioned soviet imagery,
well you're bound to be offended by a hell of a lot of other things -
possibly including my use of the word "hell" ;-)
Matt
Peter Bright
sage-
> From: Scott Tavares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:07 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
>
> Steve Lewis wrote:
>
> >That's hilarious. I've been listening to the
> >conversation amusi
vares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
Steve Lewis wrote:
>That's hilarious. I've been listening to the
>conversation amusingly.
>Steve
>
>
>--- "Craig S. Cottingham" <
Steve Lewis wrote:
That's hilarious. I've been listening to the
conversation amusingly.
Steve
--- "Craig S. Cottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Somebody email Mike Godwin, and tell him we have a
counterexample to his
Law (
http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/g/Godwin_s_Law.html
).
Peter Bright wrote:
if the Nazi's had stayed in power till now (~70 years) with the same
genocidal mentality witnessed during Hitler Germany, ~ 150 million
people would be dead at the hands of Nazi's.
No, they wouldn't, for the simple reason that he would have run out of Jews
and Slavs to kil
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.10/godwin.if.html
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Walding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo
> I sto
, STOP, STOP. It isn't a history forum.
+1000 for the Ben logo.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Maven Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] The Maven
Brilliant! ;-)
"However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional
triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects
will be unsuccessful."
-- This thread should have ended a long time ago! ;-)
[+1] for feather!
--- "Craig S. Cottingham" <[EMAIL PRO
STOP, STOP, STOP. It isn't a history forum.
+1000 for the Ben logo.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Maven Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] T
That's hilarious. I've been listening to the
conversation amusingly.
Steve
--- "Craig S. Cottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Somebody email Mike Godwin, and tell him we have a
> counterexample to his
> Law (
>
http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/g/Godwin_s_Law.html
> ).
>
> Can we please
Somebody email Mike Godwin, and tell him we have a counterexample to his
Law ( http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/g/Godwin_s_Law.html ).
Can we please drop this thread now, and get back to talking about Maven?
--
Craig S. Cottingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
> if the Nazi's had stayed in power till now (~70 years) with the same
> genocidal mentality witnessed during Hitler Germany, ~ 150 million
> people would be dead at the hands of Nazi's.
No, they wouldn't, for the simple reason that he would have run out of Jews
and Slavs to kill. He didn't have t
+1 feather
/Mikael Lundgren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Bright wrote:
The Chinese government is responsible, in one way or another, for
probably around 35 million deaths between 1949 and the present day;
whilst many millions of these deaths were attributable not to malice
as such but to economic mismanagement resulting in famine.
The Soviet regime
Le Mercredi 26 Novembre 2003 10:25, Norbert Pabiś a écrit :
> Jim Crossley wrote:
> > A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> > http://projects.walding.com/powered/
> >
> > propaganda or feather?
+1 propaganda
--
Charles-Alexandre
SABOURDIN
-
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Peter Bright wrote:
> > John D Taylor (ROE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Much more striking, and because most non-US citizens probably find the
> whole
> > debate baffling! (Though maybe Europeans would have had a similar
> reaction
> > to the original poster if th
> John D Taylor (ROE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Crossley wrote:
> > A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> > http://projects.walding.com/powered/
> >
> > propaganda or feather?
>
> +1 propaganda
>
> Much more striking, and because most non-US citizens probably find
1 feather (although not sure if I have a vote)
> from:"John D Taylor (ROE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jim Crossley wrote:
> > A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> > http://projects.walding.com/powered/
> >
> > propaganda or feather?
>
> 1 propaganda
>
> Much more striking
Jim Crossley wrote:
> A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> http://projects.walding.com/powered/
>
> propaganda or feather?
+1 propaganda
Much more striking, and because most non-US citizens probably find the whole
debate baffling! (Though maybe Europeans would have had a s
On Mercredi, nove 26, 2003, at 10:25 Europe/Paris, Norbert Pabiś wrote:
Jim Crossley wrote:
A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
http://projects.walding.com/powered/
propaganda or feather?
+1 propaganda
+1 feather.
(I would have loved the "brewed")
--
Jim Crossley wrote:
A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
http://projects.walding.com/powered/
propaganda or feather?
+1 propaganda
--
Norbert Pabiś
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 10:38, Jim Crossley wrote:
> A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> http://projects.walding.com/powered/
>
> propaganda or feather?
>
> +1 feather
+1 feather
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
> A runoff between the top 2 vote getters listed at
> http://projects.walding.com/powered/
>
> propaganda or feather?
+1 feather
It could only offend poultry or head-dress makers.
/* Joakim */
41 matches
Mail list logo
