"Łukasz Budnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi All,
> I'm using Tomahawk 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT, I am trying to use
> the component
> but I get this strange error: ClassNotFoundException:
> tree2.HtmlTreeRenderer
> Looking at the API: http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/tree2.html
> -there is a cl
No one has any suggestions?
BTJ
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:28:19 +0100
Bjørn T Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some more digging... It seems that nothing inside the
> tags is rendered...?
>
>
> BTJ
>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:13:22 +0100
> Bjørn T Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Thanks Scott, that two-threads thing might indeed be a problem.
And so might the filters.
Is there some good documentation on the difference between portlets and
"normal" jsf available?
Markus, which version of Orchestra are you using? 1.0 or a snapshot?
Regards,
Simon
Scott O'Bryan <[EMA
Hi!
> currently we're prototyping a portlet application (liferay 4.33) with
> orchestra , JPA (Hibernate) and myFaces 1.1.5.
Unhappily I have zero experience with portlets. If you could provide a
simple webapp to test this thing it would greatly help, though, I know
how much work it is to setup o
Hallo Simon,
we are using myfaces-orchestra-core-1.0.jar
Regards,
Rashmi
Simon Kitching-4 wrote:
>
> Thanks Scott, that two-threads thing might indeed be a problem.
> And so might the filters.
>
> Is there some good documentation on the difference between portlets and
> "normal" js
Hi Stojan,
Can you send this working version to Bernd so everyone can benefit of it. (a
blanc project would be a no head ake starting point for everyone).
Regards,
Zied
2008/2/4, Stojan Peshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Seam Example could not be deployed, antlr was missing...
> I've added
>
>
yes, that's how JSF works.
It does postbacks.
when you are interested in performing some "tasks" on the submitted values,
do this
public String myAction()
{
// do the work
return "tellMeWhereToGo";
}
On Feb 5, 2008 11:34 AM, deathstar64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am
Hello,
I am using the tag supplied by myfaces to produce an html form. But
I want to give a specific action that the form should have when it is
rendered. But myFaces gives an .."automatic" one when it renders the
component. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks,
Antony
--
View this message in context
Hallo Mario,
We tried using the latest snapshot of Orchestra. Unfortunately still
facing the same exception as
before.
After having tried debugging the application, I see that it fails in
class SpringConversationScope -
protected Object getBean(String beanName, O
I was actually talking about tobago seam example found here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tobago/trunk/example/seam
All I did was checkout the code and opened it with NetBeans as a Maven
project (maven plugin for netbeans is required)
At first build was not successful, but after changi
deathstar64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using the tag supplied by myfaces to produce an html form. But
> I want to give a specific action that the form should have when it is
> rendered. But myFaces gives an .."automatic" one when it renders the
> component. Any thought
Hi Stojan,
Sorry I didn't look at the svn lastly (at my first mail there wasn't any).
So the project is in progress I guess (since there's no official post about
it), it'll be a big event for the tobago community I think. Thanks for your
posts.
Regards,
Zied
2008/2/5, Stojan Peshov <[EMAIL PROT
Tomcat 6.x comes with EL libraries already. Are you sure that these don't
conflict with commons-el that you have added to your project?
Also make sure you delete the "tomcat work directory".
"Łukasz Budnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi All!
I'm using Tomcat 6.0.14 with MyFaces 1.2.2,
Hi All!
I'm using Tomcat 6.0.14 with MyFaces 1.2.2, Tomahawk 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
and JSTL 1.2.
I'm trying to run a simple application, but I keep getting weird exceptions.
Apache Tomcat is a clear installation (downloaded and unzipped), there
are no shared libraries, in CATALINA_HOME there are only l
Hi Rashmi,
Again, exact line numbers from the latest snapshot would be useful.
In an email you sent to me directly you said that with the latest snapshot the
exception was at line 83 of ConversationManager. But with the latest code, that
line is in the middle of a javadoc comment, so perhaps yo
I think that the answer is "No". You have to set the action on your
button or event (onchange)
Mario
-Original Message-
From: deathstar64 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5 febbraio 2008 11.35
To: users@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: tag !
Hello,
I am using the tag supplied by myfa
I tried this as well..no luck
regards,
Rashmi
Simon Kitching-4 wrote:
>
> BTW, you might try adding these elements to the OrchestraServletFilter
> filter-mapping clause:
>
> REQUEST
> FORWARD
> INCLUDE
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrie
when i have rowSelection="single" it is displaying the radio buttons and
when i select the button and if click on column header for sorting, the
button still showing at the same field.
how we can map these rowSelection="single" radio buttons and columns.
OR
BTW, you might try adding these elements to the OrchestraServletFilter
filter-mapping clause:
REQUEST
FORWARD
INCLUDE
Regards,
Simon
Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi Rashmi,
>
> Again, exact line numbers from the latest snapshot would be useful.
>
> In a
Hello Simon,
I tried with the latest snapshot. The exception occurs in
ConversationManager class:
public static ConversationManager getInstance(boolean create)
{
ConversationManager conversationManager = (ConversationManager)
FrameworkAdapter.getI
Rashmi,
I don't know where you are getting this code you show in the example below. It
corresponds to no version of the Orchestra code that I know of.
Method FrameworkAdapter.getInstance does not exist in either the 1.0 release or
the current trunk. In both of these it is called
FrameworkAdapt
Hi all,
I have set trinidad 1.0.4 to show lightweight dialogs. I am facing some
problems related to them when setting partialSubmit="true" on the
commandButton or commandLink. This issues seem similar to TRINIDAD-875. Has
any of you experienced this behaviour??
If I turn off lightweight dialogs,
Hallo Simon,
I downloaded the jar from the link you sent.
I try working on steps (1) and (2) as suggested by you.
Regards,
Rashmi
Simon Kitching-4 wrote:
>
> Rashmi,
>
> I don't know where you are getting this code you show in the example
> below. It corresponds to no
Hi,
I have a licensing question re web-facesconfig.dtd file that is included
with MyFaces Impl 1.2.jar. According to the source code, that file is
licensed under what looks to be modified BSD license *with* one clause added
as follows:
"You acknowledge that this software is not designed,
If there is a filter issue and you don't mind working with local portals
only, you could also add the Portal's servlet to the filter mapping in
your web.xml. That should allow filter work to be done in action
requests. Sadly "real" filter support won't be happeneing until JSR-286
and even the
Hi!
> Are there any plans about migration over Spring 2.5 in Orchestra?
Orchestra itself is compatible with Spring 2.5. We use this combination
in our projects.
> I'd like to see if Spring 2.5 can simplify orchestra configuration and
> if we can now completely declare bean throught annotations.
Wh
Ok. I'll need to add a few utilities to the common utilities and add a
common configurator jar to the project. But it should be easy enough to
do in my copious amounts of free time. I'm currently in the middle of
restructuring the bridge projects (which is almost done as well) so let
me get
> Another option is I've been tinkering with separating the configurator
> system similar to what Trinidad uses in order to put into an Apache
> commons project. The code is complete (albeit untested) but the
> configurators are a way to duplicate *most* filter logic in a JSF
> environment without
Are there any plans about migration over Spring 2.5 in Orchestra?
I'd like to see if Spring 2.5 can simplify orchestra configuration and if we
can now completely declare bean throught annotations.
And do you think it is possible to have proxy scoped bean using annotation?
Alberto Gori
Hi,
Working on the caching feature, i found out the following:
The TrinidadResourceServlet has already build in Cache-Control. It sets the
expires header to "+ 1 year". This is good in case of requesting
js-libraries,
because theses generated files has the trinidad version as suffix in its
fi
I am trying to skin the navigationPane. Since I have two navigationPane
(tabs) instances (one top menu and one secondary menu), I want to put a
different skin on each of them. It seems to me that there is no way of doing
that. I can only create one skin which will be applied to all navigationPane
i
Zigc Junk wrote:
I am trying to skin the navigationPane. Since I have two
navigationPane (tabs) instances (one top menu and one secondary menu),
I want to put a different skin on each of them. It seems to me that
there is no way of doing that. I can only create one skin which will
be applied t
Hey Daniel, you may wish to stay away from Filters if you are going to
contribute this to Trinidad. It'll break portlet compatibility.
That said, what is the problem you are trying to solve here? Is it that
resources are not currently being cached in your environment by the
browser, or that th
Can you be more specific? Assume that I have the following navigationPane,
how can I create a skin that is ONLY applied to this navigationPane.
Here is one piece of the skin I created
af|navigationPane::tabs-inactive af|navigationPane::tabs-mid A {
font-
Hello Bill,
The following should work:
.MyClass af|navigationPane::tabs-inactive af|navigationPane::tabs-mid A
{
font-weight: bold;
}
or
af|navigationPane.MyClass::tabs-inactive af|navigationPane::tabs-mid A
{
font-weight: bold;
}
The best way to know on what element the style
Just tried both syntax and it does not seem to work. Below is the html code
from Firebug. Note that I changed MyClass to t_topMenu. Do you know why?
thanks
Bill
Bills
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello Bill,
Hi all,
Recently I read a lot about using Acegi in JSF. But I can't see any
advantage. First, there is little document. Second, using Acegi is not easy.
It's quite complecated. Third, using Acegi you can just define user and the
role. Seems no chance to define group, sub group etc.
A
Hmmm, the first synthax should work just fine... can you check the generated
CSS to see how the selector was reduced?
On Feb 5, 2008 12:16 PM, Zigc Junk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just tried both syntax and it does not seem to work. Below is the html
> code from Firebug. Note that I changed MyC
Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi!
> > Are there any plans about migration over Spring 2.5 in Orchestra?
> Orchestra itself is compatible with Spring 2.5. We use this combination
> in our projects.
>
> > I'd like to see if Spring 2.5 can simplify orchestra configuration and
>
My way works if you are "embedding" one navigation pane in the other.
The example I gave would be for the "second" navigation pane, the first
would use the normal styling.
Simons works if you don't mind adding a style class.
Zigc Junk wrote:
Tried again. Yes, the first syntax works.
Thanks
hello rafa,
the problem described by TRINIDAD-875 is an issue in view of opera.
which browser are you using?
regards,
gerhard
2008/2/5, Rafa Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have set trinidad 1.0.4 to show lightweight dialogs. I am facing some
> problems related to them when settin
> I presume you mean marking beans with something like
> @Conversation(lifetime="access", name="myConversation")
> or
> @Scope(scope="conversation.access", name="myConversation")
or
@Conversation(scope="access", name="myConversation")
>
> Yes that would be cool.
>
> It's debatable whether the a
Hi All,
I'm running a example available at:
http://www.irian.at/myfacesexamples/tree2.jsf
And the result is:
javax.servlet.ServletException: Component ID treeForm:clientTree:t2c
has already been found in the view. See below for details.
+id: j_id_jsp_287013395_0
type: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+id:
Tried again. Yes, the first syntax works.
Thanks a lot
Bill
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmmm, the first synthax should work just fine... can you check the
> generated CSS to see how the selector was reduced?
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 12:16 PM, Zigc Jun
There is one minor issue. See below the Firebug style listing. In my
listing, I have disabled the background image by -tr-inhibit:
background-image; but it does not take effect. Is this a bug in trinidad or
I did something wrong?
thanks
Bill
.t_topMenu af|navigationPane::tabs-inactive af|navig
Nope, it works as designed, in your case you need to use "background-image:
none;" rather than inhibit because it's an entirely different CSS rule while
inhibit is for exact match rules coming from parent skin, not parent
selector.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Feb 5, 2008 1:30 PM, Zigc Junk <[EMAIL PROT
No this is right. Component IDs in "looping" components should always be the
same. Client IDs change.
Your example doesn't show t2c at all. Look for two components it your page
that are under the tree and have t2c as their ID. Maybe you thought that two
components could have the same ID in differe
Sorry,
this is full stack trace, the id treeForm:clientTree:t2c is repeated 3
times (I have highlighted it):
javax.servlet.ServletException: Component ID treeForm:clientTree:t2c
has already been found in the view. See below for details.
+id: j_id_jsp_287013395_0
type: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+id: t
Hi,
I have a jsp page with text input on it and a long range validator (0
to 99) connected with that field.
Now I run the following scenario:
1. enter invalid value (-123)
2. submit by command button
3. Proper validator message is displayed and everything seems to work fine
4. I cancel the pag
Hello,
the tobago-example-seam is only a simple blank web app for now.
I would like to sort out all compatibility issues in tobago.
Patches und suggestions for reasonable content in the
tobago-example-seam module are wellcome.
Regards
Bernd
Zied Hamdi schrieb:
> Hi Stojan,
>
> Sorry I didn't
Where is the view code?
On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Łukasz Budnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> this is full stack trace, the id treeForm:clientTree:t2c is repeated 3
> times (I have highlighted it):
>
> javax.servlet.ServletException: Component ID treeForm:clientTree:t2c
> has already bee
Iceweasel(Firefox) 2.0.0.5 on Debian Linux. Same issue in Firefox and
Internet Explorer 6 (and 7) on Windows XP.
Using Jboss Seam 1.2.1, MyFaces 1.1.5, Trinidad 1.0.4
Regards,
- - Rafa
On Feb 5, 2008 6:54 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello rafa,
>
> the problem described b
Hi,
My view code is simply copy & paste from:
http://www.irian.at/myfacesexamples/tree2.jsp.source
and looks like this:
What eventually worked for me is something like this:
In my application context i have defined multiple beans with
scope="conversation.manual"
When calling Conversation.getCurrentInstance().invalidate() in an action
method of one of these beans only that bean gets destroyed.
It seems as if there is one conversation object for each of my conversatio
Hi,
Suppose I have a session scoped bean class Bean1 that refers
to an application scoped bean (Bean2) using a managed property:
public class Bean1 implement Serializable {
private transient Bean2 appBean;
}
The appBean field is marked as transient because as a global object, it is
not
serial
I have added radio buttons to every row in the data table using the following
code:
Can someone tell me how to use these radio buttons. I actually want to get a
select row and after clicking the edit bu
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:42 -0800, Kent Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I have a session scoped bean class Bean1 that refers
> to an application scoped bean (Bean2) using a managed property:
>
> public class Bean1 implement Serializable {
> private transient Bean2 appBean;
> }
>
> The appBean f
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 00:54 +0100, Wolfgang Wagner wrote:
>
> In my application context i have defined multiple beans with
> scope="conversation.manual"
> When calling Conversation.getCurrentInstance().invalidate() in an action
> method of one of these beans only that bean gets destroyed.
>
> It
59 matches
Mail list logo
