Hi Mario. Thanks for you answer!
It has been very insightful. Best practices are made to be used and if new ones
are created,
new use will be made :-)
Thank you again. Regards, Renato.
- Original Message
From: Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion
Sent: Wednesday,
Hello,
I have seen this new feature in the Seam about the backing beans and I am
afraid now whether all the work we have done up
until now would not be the best practice using JSF. Is that a real difference
in not using backing beans with Myfaces?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
___
Thanks a lot for all the comments and I still have to take a look on the JSR
276 and also in the
proposals that Kito has mentioned being one of them sent by himself. Very
interesting it has been
addressing seriously now.
>I am afraid you are out of luck. In the past I have gotten under the impre
Hello,
I would like to know how could I use Trinidad components with Exadel plugin? It
seems that Trinidad is not available
on that.
Thank you.
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in
start?
That's fine w/ me.
here is a "project template" I wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/
On 9/19/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry Matthias,
>
> You have said tomahawk/ trinidad. I am thinking to use much more trinid
Sorry Matthias,
You have said tomahawk/ trinidad. I am thinking to use much more trinidad than
tomahawk, given the plenty of
components provided by the former. Anything wrong with my thoughts on that?
Thanks again.
- Original Message
From: distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
d a RT (runtime) => myfaces
dialog-framework => Web Flow
components => what you are skills in (tomahawk / trinidad)
facelets, is cool, I think their demo uses it already
-M
On 9/19/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nice new major version and very fresh indeed. Tha
ber 19, 2007 4:10:38 PM
Subject: Re: MyFaces + Facelets + Spring Web Flow - how to get start?
there was a recent 2.0 release of web flow
http://www.springframework.org/node/510
now, they spring folks ship their jsf-stuff in a separate jar.
check out their demos.
-M
On 9/19/07, distillingweb &
Hello,
I have set my expected rock components and technologies:
MyFaces: Trinidad and Tomahawk
Facelets
Spring Web Flow
Now, hi could I do my first example using all of this? Do you have a useful
link?
Obviously, I will do some googling, but please let me know if you have follow
something that
ou can indeed access LDAP with many
frameworks, but the LDAP directory itself must run somewhere if you want to use
it.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 9/17/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hello Simon,
Thank you so much for your prompt reply. Would you mind to share how your
environment lo
quires authentification, LDAP can help, etc.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 9/17/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the "advance query" reminder. I have been developing enterprise web
applications quite some time now (around
8 years). Because we have so many components
Hello,
Sorry for the "advance query" reminder. I have been developing enterprise web
applications quite some time now (around
8 years). Because we have so many components coming up every month -- or less
than that --, I wondering if I have lost
important consideration aside of choose:
* JSFs co
with Seam, Tomahawk and Facelets.
Thank you. Regards.
- Original Message ----
From: distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion
Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2007 11:07:27 PM
Subject: Re: How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype Designer?
Kito and Yaron,
ntrols if you can wait for them.
-Andrew
On 8/31/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew for you sharing on the Seam. Anybody has thoughts
about other
> components.
> I am thinking to go for Richfaces + Ajax4JSF + Icefaces and maybe
Trinidad
>
ferent
plumbing implementations around..
Best,
Wolfgang.
distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04.09.2007 12:08
Bitte antworten an
"MyFaces Discussion"
An
MyFaces Discussion
Kopie
Thema
Re: Antwort: Re: Why so many components?
Wolfgang,
ven so it does not seem clear how to make the paging work..
See also
http://pmuir.bleepbleep.org.uk/2007/04/backing-trinidads-datatable-with-seam.html
Best,
Wolfgang.
distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04.09.2007 11:08
Bitte antworten an
"MyFaces Discussion"
ormation on Trinidad's AJAX
-Andrew
On 9/3/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I know this use to be a obvious choice, but because I am a newcomer in the
> MyFaces world, what answer
> I would give to my manager if he ask me why am I using so man
Can I say that always the best practice as to get the best component feature
would be to use Ajax4JSF and
if not work could I go for Trinindad, Tomahowk, and so on?
- Original Message
From: distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 4
ponents are
more refined and offer more functionality.
E.g. the Trinidad goButton offers pure
client-side javascript handler, the commandButton offers PPR, etc.
It would be interesting to see a requirements
table matched against the diverse button types..
distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECT
Sorry, please add Ajax4JSF in the list.
- Original Message
From: distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 4:24:29 PM
Subject: Simple question about what component to use
Hello,
Let's say that I am using Trinidad
Hello,
Let's say that I am using Trinidad + RichFaces + Tomahawk and I need to render
a simple button. How could
I decide which component to use to reach this simple requirement? Is there any
criteria?
Thanks in advance.
__
gt;
To: MyFaces Discussion
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 12:47:49 PM
Subject: Re: Why so many components?
This might help in your argument:
http://www.jsfmatrix.net/
-=> Gregg <=-
distillingweb wrote:
Hello,
I know this use to be a obvious choice, b
Hello,
If you as architect will provide a documentation to the designers and
programmers, with the different components (eg. Trinidad + Facelets + Tomahawk
+ Ajax4JSF):
1. Do you gather the information of all the graphical components and explain
each of them or only provide the link where to fi
Hello,
I know this use to be a obvious choice, but because I am a newcomer in the
MyFaces world, what answer
I would give to my manager if he ask me why am I using so many components?
Now, following advices, I am planning to use MyFaces + Trinidad + Tomahawk +
Facelets + Ajax4JSF and
maybe Seam
d feel.
Hope this helps,
Yaron
-----Original Message-
From: distillingweb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 12:18 PM
To: users@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype
Designer?
Hello,
I would like to know your experien
Hello,
I would like to know your experience working in the generation of prototype. We
have adopted the concept to ask
for a person in our team that knows HTML (no programming experience) to start
doing some prototypes using Exadel and
Eclipse. My suggestion would be to use DreamWeaver instead,
on Trinidad. It should
have some really nice controls if you can wait for them.
-Andrew
On 8/31/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew for you sharing on the Seam. Anybody has thoughts about other
> components.
> I am thinking to go for Richfaces + Ajax4JSF
.xml
functionality to work on these includes (actions, navigation rules,
security, etc.). I got it to work, but it took quite a bit of research
and some testing.
-Andrew
On 8/30/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I am using JSF+Hibernate+Spring
Hi Andrew,
I am using JSF+Hibernate+Spring. The Spring part becomes my concerning whether
to use Seam or not. However,
I have seen seem some replies of people using the same stack as mine
integrating with Seam, but I am not
sure if it has been deployed in production without big issues.
Thanks.
29 matches
Mail list logo
