Re: Why no backing beans required in the Seam is so important?

Hi Mario. Thanks for you answer! It has been very insightful. Best practices are made to be used and if new ones are created, new use will be made :-) Thank you again. Regards, Renato. - Original Message From: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces Discussion

Why no backing beans required in the Seam is so important?

Hello, I have seen this new feature in the Seam about the backing beans and I am afraid now whether all the work we have done up until now would not be the best practice using JSF. Is that a real difference in not using backing beans with Myfaces? Thanks in advance. Regards.

Re: Exadel with Trinidad?

Thanks a lot for all the comments and I still have to take a look on the JSR 276 and also in the proposals that Kito has mentioned being one of them sent by himself. Very interesting it has been addressing seriously now. I am afraid you are out of luck. In the past I have gotten under the

Exadel with Trinidad?

Hello, I would like to know how could I use Trinidad components with Exadel plugin? It seems that Trinidad is not available on that. Thank you. Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in

MyFaces + Facelets + Spring Web Flow - how to get start?

Hello, I have set my expected rock components and technologies: MyFaces: Trinidad and Tomahawk Facelets Spring Web Flow Now, hi could I do my first example using all of this? Do you have a useful link? Obviously, I will do some googling, but please let me know if you have follow something

Re: MyFaces + Facelets + Spring Web Flow - how to get start?

, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have set my expected rock components and technologies: MyFaces: Trinidad and Tomahawk Facelets Spring Web Flow Now, hi could I do my first example using all of this? Do you have a useful link? Obviously, I will do some googling, but please let

Re: MyFaces + Facelets + Spring Web Flow - how to get start?

? you need a RT (runtime) = myfaces dialog-framework = Web Flow components = what you are skills in (tomahawk / trinidad) facelets, is cool, I think their demo uses it already -M On 9/19/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice new major version and very fresh indeed. Thanks for the link

Re: MyFaces + Facelets + Spring Web Flow - how to get start?

Sorry Matthias, You have said tomahawk/ trinidad. I am thinking to use much more trinidad than tomahawk, given the plenty of components provided by the former. Anything wrong with my thoughts on that? Thanks again. - Original Message From: distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces

Re: MyFaces + Facelets + Spring Web Flow - how to get start?

Flow - how to get start? That's fine w/ me. here is a project template I wrote: http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ On 9/19/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Matthias, You have said tomahawk/ trinidad. I am thinking to use much more trinidad than tomahawk, given the plenty

What has to be considered in the web development environment (advaced query)?

Hello, Sorry for the advance query reminder. I have been developing enterprise web applications quite some time now (around 8 years). Because we have so many components coming up every month -- or less than that --, I wondering if I have lost important consideration aside of choose: * JSFs

Re: What has to be considered in the web development environment (advaced query)?

. If the application requires authentification, LDAP can help, etc. Regards, ~ Simon On 9/17/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Sorry for the advance query reminder. I have been developing enterprise web applications quite some time now (around 8 years). Because we have so many components

Re: What has to be considered in the web development environment (advaced query)?

, but the LDAP directory itself must run somewhere if you want to use it. Regards, ~ Simon On 9/17/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Simon, Thank you so much for your prompt reply. Would you mind to share how your environment looks like? My understand is that for LDAP

Fwd: How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype Designer? Only for Seam, Tomahawk and Facelets?

, Tomahawk and Facelets. Thank you. Regards. - Original Message From: distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2007 11:07:27 PM Subject: Re: How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype Designer? Kito and Yaron

Re: Which components to use?

controls if you can wait for them. -Andrew On 8/31/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Andrew for you sharing on the Seam. Anybody has thoughts about other components. I am thinking to go for Richfaces + Ajax4JSF + Icefaces and maybe Trinidad and Seam, because I am

Re: Why so many components?

for information on Trinidad's AJAX -Andrew On 9/3/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I know this use to be a obvious choice, but because I am a newcomer in the MyFaces world, what answer I would give to my manager if he ask me why am I using so many components? Now

Re: Antwort: Re: Why so many components?

not seem clear how to make the paging work.. See also http://pmuir.bleepbleep.org.uk/2007/04/backing-trinidads-datatable-with-seam.html Best, Wolfgang. distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.09.2007 11:08 Bitte antworten an MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Why so many components?

implementations around.. Best, Wolfgang. distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.09.2007 12:08 Bitte antworten an MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org An MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org Kopie Thema Re: Antwort: Re: Why so many components

Why so many components?

Hello, I know this use to be a obvious choice, but because I am a newcomer in the MyFaces world, what answer I would give to my manager if he ask me why am I using so many components? Now, following advices, I am planning to use MyFaces + Trinidad + Tomahawk + Facelets + Ajax4JSF and maybe

Documentation for designers and programmers with different components?

Hello, If you as architect will provide a documentation to the designers and programmers, with the different components (eg. Trinidad + Facelets + Tomahawk + Ajax4JSF): 1. Do you gather the information of all the graphical components and explain each of them or only provide the link where to

Re: Why so many components?

] To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 12:47:49 PM Subject: Re: Why so many components? This might help in your argument: http://www.jsfmatrix.net/ -= Gregg =- distillingweb wrote: Hello, I know this use to be a obvious

Simple question about what component to use

Hello, Let's say that I am using Trinidad + RichFaces + Tomahawk and I need to render a simple button. How could I decide which component to use to reach this simple requirement? Is there any criteria? Thanks in advance.

fwd: Simple question about what component to use

Sorry, please add Ajax4JSF in the list. - Original Message From: distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@myfaces.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 4:24:29 PM Subject: Simple question about what component to use Hello, Let's say that I am using Trinidad + RichFaces + Tomahawk

Re: Simple question about what component to use

components are more refined and offer more functionality. E.g. the Trinidad goButton offers pure client-side javascript handler, the commandButton offers PPR, etc. It would be interesting to see a requirements table matched against the diverse button types.. distillingweb [EMAIL

Re: Simple question about what component to use

Can I say that always the best practice as to get the best component feature would be to use Ajax4JSF and if not work could I go for Trinindad, Tomahowk, and so on? - Original Message From: distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org Sent: Monday

Re: Which components to use?

is based on Trinidad. It should have some really nice controls if you can wait for them. -Andrew On 8/31/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Andrew for you sharing on the Seam. Anybody has thoughts about other components. I am thinking to go for Richfaces + Ajax4JSF + Icefaces

How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype Designer?

Hello, I would like to know your experience working in the generation of prototype. We have adopted the concept to ask for a person in our team that knows HTML (no programming experience) to start doing some prototypes using Exadel and Eclipse. My suggestion would be to use DreamWeaver

Re: How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype Designer?

this helps, Yaron -Original Message- From: distillingweb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 12:18 PM To: users@myfaces.apache.org Subject: How to work with JSF components and HTML Web Prototype Designer? Hello, I would like to know your experience working

Re: Which components to use?

pages.xml functionality to work on these includes (actions, navigation rules, security, etc.). I got it to work, but it took quite a bit of research and some testing. -Andrew On 8/30/07, distillingweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, I am using JSF+Hibernate+Spring. The Spring part becomes my

Re: Which components to use? - Seam?!

Hi Andrew, I am using JSF+Hibernate+Spring. The Spring part becomes my concerning whether to use Seam or not. However, I have seen seem some replies of people using the same stack as mine integrating with Seam, but I am not sure if it has been deployed in production without big issues. Thanks.