Hi Helmut,
it is an important goal to make it possible to run a Tobago 1.0.21
application with Tobago 1.1 with little or without effort.
In particular cases, there a some changes to do, but the main idea is,
that applications will run.
To be compatible, you should not use code which is
Hi Udo,
well, this sounds good. But what about the release plan for a stable
1.1.0 version? We're thinking about lauching a new project starting
with 1.1.0 to have the benefits of the new layout manager. But our
project schedule is very short, so we don't have the time to deal
with new bugs etc.
Yeah,
I'm full aware of the situation described below. The main problem in
trinidad is that oracle uses him as foundation for ADF Rich Faces, and
that's the main reason why trinidad core isn't going to change dramatically.
More components should come together with the community. For example,
Yes I agree with you.
The architecture needs more documentation, especially there are some
really important API classes that have no JavaDoc at all. As for the
maven-faces-plugin, I really dislike it. It does a nice job, but it is
really hard to work with and modify (speaking from experience).
While we're on this subject, I think it's clear that combining the component
suites might increase the available resources for moving things forward.. I
know this has been discussed in the past, but I don't think there was a
clear consensus...
---
Kito D. Mann -- Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
Hi all,
let me explain the actual status of the Tobago development:
We have branched the development into the tobago-1.0.x branch and the
trunk which is the next major release.
The tobago-1.0.x branch is stable and basis of the actual releases. The
next release (1.0.21) will come up in the
Salut Udo,
Hi all,
let me explain the actual status of the Tobago development:
We have branched the development into the tobago-1.0.x branch and the
trunk which is the next major release.
looks like, . that i was wrong. Tobago is still alive, great.
The trunk (1.1.x) is an area of
Hi Christian,
I know the issue with the forEach. There are many aspects to notice with
the interation stuff.
I've written a sample for tobago 1.0.x which works with the c:forEach
from the JSTL.
But this not works with Facelets and also not with JSP-Tag-Files
(because scriptlets are not
I forgot the link:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tobago/branches/tobago-1.0.x/example/demo/src/main/webapp/best-practice/for-each.jsp
Udo Schnurpfeil schrieb:
Hi Christian,
I know the issue with the forEach. There are many aspects to notice
with the interation stuff.
I've written
Andrew,
it's always the same reason.
Trinidad is too complicated do extend without strong knowledge:
1. in it's architecture isn't well documented
2. in maven-faces-plugin
I'm familiar with your wiki page (
Salut
Hi All,
We are developing a web application with myfaces.
That's fine, JSF is the cool think. I worked with
Tobago, that comes with a great layout manager
and some cool widgets.
It is not my intention to overwhelm that nice
project but it seems to be dead. The development
of new
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Christian Groove
groo...@groovesytems.de wrote:
Salut
Hi All,
We are developing a web application with myfaces.
That's fine, JSF is the cool think. I worked with
Tobago, that comes with a great layout manager
and some cool widgets.
It is not my intention
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Christian Groove
groo...@groovesytems.de wrote:
Salut
Hi All,
We are developing a web application with myfaces.
That's fine, JSF is the cool think. I worked with
Tobago, that comes with a great layout manager
and some cool widgets.
It is not
I would not jump to just saying that's totally wrong ... when there
is truth to the observation. I cannot speak for Tobago, but there are
areas of Trinidad that have not significantly changed in years. This
may give the impression that there is not much ongoing development.
What you find with
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Trinidad-vs-Tobago-tp23851748p23873832.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
could some one plaese advice us which is the better technology and the
distinct features of these technologies.
Thanks,
Srikanth
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Trinidad-vs-Tobago-tp23851748p23851748.html
Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 matches
Mail list logo
