Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
Tom wrote:
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
I'm not knocking MSFT Office. I'm simply applauding OpenOffice. I
support it, and look forward to the developers optimizing it further,
and hammering out the bugs.
I'm not knocking Open Office Office. I'm pointing out problems
Ganesha Bhaskara wrote:
I completely agree with you. First impression is EXTREMELY important and
this needs attention in OO. I mostly use Staroffice 8.0 and I have
observed that its start time after cold boot is lesser than the
corresponding start time of OO. I have no idea what Sun is doing to
RBL wrote:
Ganesha Bhaskara wrote:
I completely agree with you. First impression is EXTREMELY important and
this needs attention in OO. I mostly use Staroffice 8.0 and I have
observed that its start time after cold boot is lesser than the
corresponding start time of OO. I have no idea what
RBL wrote:
Ganesha Bhaskara wrote:
I completely agree with you. First impression is EXTREMELY important and
this needs attention in OO. I mostly use Staroffice 8.0 and I have
observed that its start time after cold boot is lesser than the
corresponding start time of OO. I have no idea what
MSFT is Microsoft's ticker symbol.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other major point: OpenOffice is OPEN. It supports open standards
better--MUCH better--than MSFT Office.
Every try to write or edit a blog post in MSFT Office, and then cut and
past it to a blog? The resulting POLLUTED hidden markup text chokes
Feedburner.
Take that same polluted text,
I appreciate that sentiment. But people looking for stark comparisons
between the two just might find this intellectual discourse of value.
My 2c. Shutting up now ...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
RBL wrote:
Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
Are you happy w/how fast it starts up. How about how fast you can
open a document. If so, what OS are you running it on. What kind of
tweaks? How much RAM are you using?
I would like to be able to speed up OO. I really hate
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 2:53 AM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [users] OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James
Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
Are you happy w/how fast it starts up. How about how fast you can open a
document. If so, what OS are you running it on. What kind of tweaks? How
much RAM are you using?
I would like to be able to speed up OO. I really hate having to wait on
it to start, load, etc.
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
I also find many things are simply easier to do in
OpenOffice. Calc is tighter and faster.
Are you nuts? Excel is faster in every respect - starting, opening
documents, recalculating, saving. I have cases where save/load in time
Calc (with native formats) is 50 TIMES
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBL
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:18 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
That said, the OOo development team should strive to beat
Excel performance
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:18 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
That said, the OOo development team should strive to beat
Excel performance at every turn.
Yep.
Perhaps there needs to be an optimization effort
Tom wrote:
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
I'm not knocking MSFT Office. I'm simply applauding OpenOffice. I
support it, and look forward to the developers optimizing it further,
and hammering out the bugs.
I'm not knocking Open Office Office. I'm pointing out problems in
OpenOffice that need
RBL wrote:
Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
Are you happy w/how fast it starts up. How about how fast you can
open a document. If so, what OS are you running it on. What kind of
tweaks? How much RAM are you using?
I would like to be able to speed up OO. I really hate having to wait
on it to start,
-Original Message-
From: Thomas w. Cranston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:07 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
I run OO on 2 identical computers. One w/FC5, the other w/Win 98SE
/Lakewood UMC
P. O. Box 206
Cowden, IL 62422
217-783-2207
Director IGRC Extension Course of Study
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: RBL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:07 AM
Subject: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBL
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:18 PM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
That said, the OOo development team should strive to beat
Excel performance at every turn.
Yep.
Perhaps there needs
18 matches
Mail list logo
