> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBL
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:18 PM
> To: users@openoffice.org
> Subject: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
> That said, the OOo development team should strive to beat
> Excel performa
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Please discontinue this thread as it serves no useful purpose. I
also notice that some of the people posting to this thread have sent
CC to the OP. While it might stroke our egos to do this, I doubt that
the OP in enjoying these emails. It might even turn him or her
a
Tom wrote:
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
I'm not knocking MSFT Office. I'm simply applauding OpenOffice. I
support it, and look forward to the developers optimizing it further,
and hammering out the bugs.
I'm not knocking Open Office Office. I'm pointing out problems in
OpenOffice that need to
RBL wrote:
Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
Are you happy w/how fast it starts up. How about how fast you can
open a document. If so, what OS are you running it on. What kind of
tweaks? How much RAM are you using?
I would like to be able to speed up OO. I really hate having to wait
on it to start,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas w. Cranston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:07 PM
> To: users@openoffice.org
> Subject: Re: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
>
> I run OO on 2 identical computers. One w/FC5,
It is true that Open Office is a bit slower for some reason. I just open a
blank document whenever I boot up the computer and everything goes well.
I like OOo for many things. The problems I have are simply because of not
being familiar with the product.
Howard Sallee, pastor
Cowden/Lakewo
Dan Lewis wrote:
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Snakes on a plane ?
Please discontinue this thread as it serves no useful purpose. I
also notice that some of the people posting to this thread have sent
CC to the OP. While it might stroke our egos to do this, I doubt that
the OP in enjoying th
Thomas w. Cranston wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>> Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
>> I'm not knocking MSFT Office. I'm simply applauding OpenOffice. I
>> support it, and look forward to the developers optimizing it further,
>> and hammering out the bugs.
>
> I'm not knocking Open Office Office. I'm pointing ou
RBL wrote:
> Ganesha Bhaskara wrote:
>> I completely agree with you. First impression is EXTREMELY important and
>> this needs attention in OO. I mostly use Staroffice 8.0 and I have
>> observed that its start time after cold boot is lesser than the
>> corresponding start time of OO. I have no idea
RBL wrote:
> Ganesha Bhaskara wrote:
>> I completely agree with you. First impression is EXTREMELY important and
>> this needs attention in OO. I mostly use Staroffice 8.0 and I have
>> observed that its start time after cold boot is lesser than the
>> corresponding start time of OO. I have no idea
10 matches
Mail list logo
