I would like to enable the Bayes system with auto-learning. I thought
that I had my config setup correctly but apparently I don't. My config
looks like this:
##
# How we want to modify the email
rewrite_header subject [**SPAM**]
report_safe 0
#Bayes learning system
use_bayes 1
bayes_au
From: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 09:31 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > > Is there something I should/could do about these expiry runs? It
seems
> > > odd that it's been like this for a couple of days now... How could I
> > > know that this was the issue?
> >
> >
From: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 08:31 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Usually a high load average means that a spamd child suddenly (or
possibly
> > slowly) got fat, and you are out of memory and thrashing to beat the
band.
> > The two most common causes of this s
From: "David Brodbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Johnson, S wrote:
> > Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the spam I can
> > possibly get?
>
> A post to the "alt.test" newsgroup used to be highly effective; don't
> know if it still is today.
>
> Subscribing to Ameritech DSL might
Hehe, yeah, (?>) is atomic grouping ;)
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:21:57PM -0400, Keith Ivey wrote:
> Rocky Olsen wrote:
> >no, possessive quantifiers/atomic grouping discard saved states to back
> >tracking will not occur for what was matched.
>
> Sounds like you might be able to use (?>pattern)
I've received some whitelist submissions for 70_sare_whitelist.cf,
from a mailing service used by several retailers.
I've checked over these entries, and verified that nobody on my email
server is receiving spam from them. But before they get added to the
next release of the whitelist rule set, I
Rocky Olsen wrote:
no, possessive quantifiers/atomic grouping discard saved states to back
tracking will not occur for what was matched.
Sounds like you might be able to use (?>pattern) to do what you want.
See perldoc perlre.
--
Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Washington, DC
Hello Frederic,
Thursday, May 12, 2005, 8:40:17 AM, you wrote:
>>FG> X-spam-status: No, hits=5.312 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
FG> tests=BAYES_99,
>>FG> RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO
>>that does score high enough to be classified as spam, but you or your
>>administrator have raise
Hello Jack, Chris,
Thursday, May 12, 2005, 8:46:40 AM, you wrote:
JLS> At 09:19 AM 5.12.2005 +0100, Chris Russell wrote:
>>Trying to Update this morning gives:
>>Lint output: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
JLS> SARE_OBFU_SPL_ORDERING
>>lint: 1 issues detected. please rerun wit
At 09:23 AM 5.12.2005 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> Am running FBSD-4.11 and SA-3.03_3
>> I find that same problem. Also, when I open the rule with an editor, I see
>> the file is filled with those DOS carriage returns - ^M
>>
>> When I remove them, then the --lint sees 9 problems.
>
>Strange. SA
> He is using html codes to generate his page
> Each row of text is composed of word segments generated from many table
row
Nasty little guy, isn't he?
> Is there some rule who can catch this kind of spammers ?
The new SARE obfu rules have some good ones for this guy, but there is
currently a p
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:36:47PM -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
> Anyone have any sample code for walking the message node tree and
> looking at the properties on each node?
find_parts() basically does this, but it only looks at the content-type, but
you can use it as a basis.
--
Randomly Generated
Anyone have any sample code for walking the message node tree and
looking at the properties on each node?
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:45:56PM -0700, Kevin W. Gagel
> > wrote: I've just installed spamassassin on this new
> > server and have tried to launch spamd using the
> > /etc/init.d/spamassassin script but I get this error:
> > Starting spamd: ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.02,
> > but using
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:45:56PM -0700, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> I've just installed spamassassin on this new server and have
> tried to launch spamd using the /etc/init.d/spamassassin
> script but I get this error:
> Starting spamd: ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.02, but
> using modules v3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The production server we are trying to run on only has 128mb of memory.
I can't believe we got a machine with that little, but it happened. I
might try running only 2 children of SPAMD, refreshing the processes
every 5 messages or so to see if that will work, but I'd s
Hi.
I am migrating spamassassin from my perimeter firewall to another server to
lighten the load on the firewall. I have installed SA3.0 on the new machine and
have done some testing. I am getting different results on each SA install.
Configuration for both machines: Windows 2000 all hotfixes a
no, possessive quantifiers/atomic grouping discard saved states to back
tracking will not occur for what was matched.
-Rocky
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:00:18PM -0700, Mike Jackson wrote:
> >AFAIK Perl doesn't support possessive Quantifiers, therefore SA does
> >not.
>
> Is this the same as "gre
Ah crap, you are right, perl doesn't have possessive quantifiers.
thx
-Rocky
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:56:01PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Rocky Olsen wrote:
>
> >i tried writing a couple of regexps using the possessive quantifiers '++'
> >and '*+' and spamassassin --lint threw up the error
AFAIK Perl doesn't support possessive Quantifiers, therefore SA does
not.
Is this the same as "greedy"? Aren't Perl regexes always greedy unless you
use +?, *?, or ??
Rocky Olsen wrote:
>i tried writing a couple of regexps using the possessive quantifiers '++'
>and '*+' and spamassassin --lint threw up the error "invalid regexp for
>rule", but was fine when i switched it to use atomic grouping. Does SA not
>support possessive quantifiers? or was it just a mist
I've just installed spamassassin on this new server and have
tried to launch spamd using the /etc/init.d/spamassassin
script but I get this error:
Starting spamd: ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.02, but
using modules v3.03!
What is causing this?
Redhat Enterprise Linux
SA installed using
i tried writing a couple of regexps using the possessive quantifiers '++'
and '*+' and spamassassin --lint threw up the error "invalid regexp for
rule", but was fine when i switched it to use atomic grouping. Does SA not
support possessive quantifiers? or was it just a mistake in the lint
checking
> However, when querying
> achat-montre-rolex.net.multi.surbl.org, the firewall
> appears to decide that the answer is within a zone it has
> authority over,
> and rejects it (returning NXDOMAIN to the internal DNS servers).
>
> I'm going to look into figuring out how to allow these queries thr
Johnson, S wrote:
Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the spam I can
possibly get?
A post to the "alt.test" newsgroup used to be highly effective; don't
know if it still is today.
Subscribing to Ameritech DSL might work. ;) My [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email account gets more spam tha
Thomas Cameron wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 12:20 -0500, Jon Dossey wrote:
I'd go through your maillog, and check the spamassassin processing
times, and see if you can pinpoint where the processing time shoots up.
Then, go through your mqueue and take a look at the offending message.
It wasn't jus
I would recommend FreeBSD + Qmail as MTA.
My company runs an e-mail outsourcing business and this combination has done
wonders for us.
-George
On 5/12/2005 12:54 PM, Ben Wylie wrote:
> Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box.
> would like to migrate my mailserver onto this linux
David Gibbs wrote:
> I ran spamd in debug mode for a while, hoping that I could catch one of
> the messages slipping by ... and I did.
Anyone?
This is happening more frequently ... and I can't find a pattern.
david
> If this is documented somewhere, I couldn't find it. Seems that the RPM
> I'm running from didn't include init.pre, though the tarball
> distribution does.
init.pre is a standard part of the distro. If the RPM is missing it, it is
broken, and you should probably point that out to the maintaine
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote the following on 12/05/2005 18:12:
Actually, scratch that. Those are not the documents I was thinking they
were.Instead, download the latest copy of SA and you will find a
folder in the distribution called "sql". In there, there is some README
files that describe ho
On 5/12/2005 12:54 PM, Ben Wylie wrote:
> Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box.
> would like to migrate my mailserver onto this linux box so that hopefully I
> will be able to get a faster, more stable system.
> Is there a standard combination programs used as a mailserver as I
Many thanks,
I'll give it a try
Thanks again
Eddy
- Original Message -
From: "martin smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamassassin" ; "'Eddy Beliveau'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: spammer is using html code for spamming
Whoops outlook capitalised
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 09:31 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Is there something I should/could do about these expiry runs? It seems
> > odd that it's been like this for a couple of days now... How could I
> > know that this was the issue?
>
> Um, this isn't my area of expertise. I suspect Matt or
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 12:20 -0500, Jon Dossey wrote:
> This may only be a temporary fix. Personally, rebooting a linux machine
> to solve a problem just isn't acceptable. Did you try restarting spamd
> before rebooting?
Several times. I restarted the entire mail suite - sendmail, clam, SA,
mil
> Is there something I should/could do about these expiry runs? It seems
> odd that it's been like this for a couple of days now... How could I
> know that this was the issue?
Um, this isn't my area of expertise. I suspect Matt or Justin will be along
with a workable suggestion fairly soon. I'
> From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: spamassassin-users
> Subject: RE: [SOLVED] Re: Suddenly load average of 15-18???
>
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 11:46 -0500, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:38 AM
> > > To
> symptom. Anyone have any ideas why this would suddenly start?
Running Awl? Running Bayes? Since it starts immediately, it sounds like a
large expiry run for one or the other of them. If you aren't running
either, then this may be the area where nobody really knows what is going
wrong.
Thanks for your efforts and tests. I
think I found the problem.
The production server we are trying
to run on only has 128mb of memory. I can't believe we got a machine
with that little, but it happened. I might try running only 2 children
of SPAMD, refreshing the processes every 5 messages or
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Look at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/ for file
names that end in SQL.
Kevin
Actually, scratch that. Those are not the documents I was thinking they
were.Instead, download the latest copy of SA and you will find a
folder in the distribution cal
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:47:26PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote:
>
> Thanks, though I can't seem to find the Docs that cover bayes/AWL setup on
> the Wiki or apache site.
>
> Are there any docs that are considered definitive around?
>
sql/README.bayes
sql/README.awl
is the definitive documentation
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote the following on 12/05/2005 18:03:
Alan Munday wrote:
Look at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/ for file
names that end in SQL.
Kevin
Thanks, they did not come up when googling.
Alan
Ben Wylie wrote:
Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box.
I have just bought a new server and will probably be running CentOS on it. I
would like to migrate my mailserver onto this linux box so that hopefully I
will be able to get a faster, more stable system.
I'm looking for advice a
Alan Munday wrote:
Thanks, though I can't seem to find the Docs that cover bayes/AWL setup
on the Wiki or apache site.
Are there any docs that are considered definitive around?
Look at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/ for file
names that end in SQL.
Kevin
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:53 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (May 12), Thomas Cameron said:
> > spamc is suddenly bringing my mail server to its knees.
> >
> > Running RHEL 4 with the spamassassin-3.0.1-0.EL4 (supplied by Red Hat) and
> > spamass-milter-0.3.0-3 (I made that RPM) alo
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 11:46 -0500, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:38 AM
> > To: spamassassin-users; spamass-milt-list@nongnu.org
> > Subject: [SOLVED] Re: Suddenly load average of 15-18???
> >
> > OK, this is a weird solutio
Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box.
I have just bought a new server and will probably be running CentOS on it. I
would like to migrate my mailserver onto this linux box so that hopefully I
will be able to get a faster, more stable system.
I'm looking for advice as to what the 's
Michael Parker wrote the following on 12/05/2005 17:37:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:16:19PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote:
I've been looking through the SA SQL docs and can only see references to
spamc/spamd use of SQL.
Can I just confirm that SQL can be used with spamassassin as well?
Only for Bayes
> From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:38 AM
> To: spamassassin-users; spamass-milt-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: [SOLVED] Re: Suddenly load average of 15-18???
>
> OK, this is a weird solution... I rebooted the server and all the
> problems went away. It
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:16:19PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote:
>
> I've been looking through the SA SQL docs and can only see references to
> spamc/spamd use of SQL.
>
> Can I just confirm that SQL can be used with spamassassin as well?
Only for Bayes and AWL, userprefs in SQL requires the use of
OK, this is a weird solution... I rebooted the server and all the
problems went away. It's chuffing along happily now.
Memory leak, maybe?
Thomas
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 18:10 +0200, Christoph Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Cameron schrieb:
> > I just tried that and as soon as I restarted everything the load shot up
> > to ~ 6. I had to kill everything and remove the SA milter.
> >
> > I'd like to figure out what the root cause is rather
Whoops outlook capitalised this wrong with an I instead of i at the end.
This is what it should have been;
body MS_Body_Hide_DRUG /\b(?:R[!a-z]?eta il|P[!a-z]?ri ces|V.?I RA|C[!a-z]?I
S|(?:V|U)L AM|U[!a-z]?LTRAM|S[!a-z]?MA)\b/i
> Am running FBSD-4.11 and SA-3.03_3
> I find that same problem. Also, when I open the rule with an editor, I see
> the file is filled with those DOS carriage returns - ^M
>
> When I remove them, then the --lint sees 9 problems.
Strange. SA normally doesn't care beans about dos CRs in the rules f
I've been looking through the SA SQL docs and can only see references to
spamc/spamd use of SQL.
Can I just confirm that SQL can be used with spamassassin as well?
Thanks
Alan
M>-Original Message-
M>From: Eddy Beliveau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M>Sent: 12 May 2005 16:49
M>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
M>Subject: spammer is using html code for spamming
M>
M>Hi!
M>
M>I'm using spamassassin 2.64 with success
M>
M>I'm having problem catching some specific spamme
Hi,
Thomas Cameron schrieb:
> I just tried that and as soon as I restarted everything the load shot up
> to ~ 6. I had to kill everything and remove the SA milter.
>
> I'd like to figure out what the root cause is rather than band-aid the
> symptom. Anyone have any ideas why this would suddenly
Mick Szucs wrote:
SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on Fedora Core 2.
I'm trying to set up SURBL from the instructions at www.surbl.org
Thank you to Martin Hepworth who pointed out that the plugin needs to be
loaded via /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre:
$ cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre
# URIDNSBL - look up
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 08:31 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Usually a high load average means that a spamd child suddenly (or possibly
> slowly) got fat, and you are out of memory and thrashing to beat the band.
> The two most common causes of this seem to be Bayes expiry runs and Awl
> expiry runs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance
problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8
and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
Ran the test differently and got different results. I sent the 573
messages from a different host. Both the send
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen M. Przepiora wrote:
> Take a look at the switches you have in /etc/init.d/spamassassin change
> them to only run 5 processess and to die off after 15 or twenty scans.
> -m5 --max-conn-per-child=5
> Steve
I just tried that and as soon as I restarted every
At 09:19 AM 5.12.2005 +0100, Chris Russell wrote:
>
>
>Trying to Update this morning gives:
>
>Lint output: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
SARE_OBFU_SPL_ORDERING
>lint: 1 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more
information.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Chris
>
Am running FB
Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: SPAMassassin Users
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:07:50 PDT
> Subject: Re: Uncatched spam and rules weith modification..
>Hello Frederic,
>FG> X-spam-status: No, hits=5.312 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
tests=BAYES_99,
>FG> RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH, RCVD_
> Your configuration and installation are fine. multi.surbl.org is
> the only list that should be checked, as it's the combined list
> with all other SURBL lists included:
>
> http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#multi
Aha! I think I've found the problem. The behaviour for SpamCopURI must have
ch
Usually a high load average means that a spamd child suddenly (or possibly
slowly) got fat, and you are out of memory and thrashing to beat the band.
The two most common causes of this seem to be Bayes expiry runs and Awl
expiry runs. Sometimes though it can seemingly happen from some unknown
sequ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance
problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8
and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
This may not be much help. I put 573 messages in a subfolder and ran
the following script. I watched `prstat -n
Hello,
SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on Fedora Core 2.
I'm trying to set up SURBL from the instructions at www.surbl.org
I've added:
urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org.A 64
body URIBL_JP_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_JP_SURBL')
describe URIBL_JP_SURBL Has URI in JP at http://www.su
Take a look at the switches you have in /etc/init.d/spamassassin change
them to only run 5 processess and to die off after 15 or twenty scans.
-m5 --max-conn-per-child=5
Steve
Thomas Cameron wrote:
All -
spamc is suddenly bringing my mail server to its knees.
Running RHEL 4 with the spamassassin-
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
James R wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
How can that happen? Anybody else here with the same experience?
Are we talking about a bug here? I would really like to know if this
is a problem in my setup or if others are experiencing the same..
All -
spamc is suddenly bringing my mail server to its knees.
Running RHEL 4 with the spamassassin-3.0.1-0.EL4 (supplied by Red Hat) and
spamass-milter-0.3.0-3 (I made that RPM) along with razor-agents-2.67-0,
dcc-1.3.0-0 and pyzor-0.4.0-0.
All of a sudden about two days ago spamc processes were
James R wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
How can that happen? Anybody else here with the same experience?
Are we talking about a bug here? I would really like to know if this
is a problem in my setup or if others are experiencing the same..
Arvinn
What's the problem
On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 7:02:47 AM, John Stewart wrote:
> This is killing me here dozens of spams this morning getting through
> (with bayes, RDJ+SARE, razor, dcc). Without the SpamCopURI working, my
> detection rate plummets.
> Any ideas why SpamCopURI would only be querying multi.surbl.o
This is killing me here dozens of spams this morning getting through
(with bayes, RDJ+SARE, razor, dcc). Without the SpamCopURI working, my
detection rate plummets.
Any ideas why SpamCopURI would only be querying multi.surbl.org even though
all of them are configured in my spamcop_uri.cf?
I'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance
problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8
and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
What is the simplest way for me to see this problem? I use CSW packages
for sendmail, MD, SA, perl and others. R
Thanks all
Robert
Peace he would say instead of goodbyepeace
my brother.
From: Robert Swan
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:00
AM
To:
spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: rule edit
I am having trouble with a custom rule and wonder
On Thursday May 12 2005 8:20 am, Tim Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:48:40 -0400
>
> Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had RDJ fetching rules updates successfully until just
> > recently. It seems that some part of my set-up now chokes on
> > downloading and installing Ti
hi Robert,
In an older episode (Thursday 12 May 2005 15:00), Robert Swan wrote:
> I am having trouble with a custom rule and wondered if anyone know why
> this didn't work. I have pasted an error from sa-learn and also the rule
> below. I am running Redhat 9 and Spamassassin 3.0.3
>
>
>
>
>
On Thu, 12 May 2005 09:00:10 -0400
"Robert Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble with a custom rule and wondered if anyone know why
> this didn't work. I have pasted an error from sa-learn and also the
> rule below.
> body VIRUS_SOBER5 /*** Attachment-Scanner: Status
you'll need to escape the *
so
body VIRUS_SOBER5 /\*\*\* Attachment-Scanner: Status OK/I
HTH
Richard
From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 May 2005 14:00
To: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
I've been experiencing and documenting
a pretty severe performance problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x
(nightly) under Solaris 8 and 9, Perl 5.8.3.
We're running Sendmail 8.12.11, and
I've tried milters MimeDefang and Spamass-milter.
I initially thought this problem was
related to the
I am having trouble with a custom rule and wondered if
anyone know why this didn’t work. I have pasted an error from sa-learn
and also the rule below. I am running Redhat 9 and Spamassassin 3.0.3
invalid regexp for rule VIRUS_SOBER5: /***
Attachment-Scanner: Status OK/i
body V
On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:48:40 -0400
Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had RDJ fetching rules updates successfully until just
> recently. It seems that some part of my set-up now chokes on
> downloading and installing Tim Jackson's Bogus Virus Warnings
> ruleset.
Please feel free
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:48:40AM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> If I take Bogus Virus Warnings out of my RDJ config file (ie. I don't use RDJ
> to download and install), I have no problems.
>
> I recently sent a message to Tim, but haven't gotten a response.
>
> Does anyone have any idea wh
ARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollback command is: mv
-f /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/sa-blacklist.current.2;
mv
-f /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/blacklist.cf.2005051
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
How can that happen? Anybody else here with the same experience?
Are we talking about a bug here? I would really like to know if this is
a problem in my setup or if others are experiencing the same..
Arvinn
What's the problem? Looks like, in
> At 05:51 AM 5/11/2005, Marco Herrn wrote:
>>It seems that the --max-children option doesn't do as one expects, since
>>spamd now uses a preforking. And it seems that the processes are not
>>limited at all.
>
> Are you sure? Are there more than 5 spamd's in ps ax?
You are right. There are only 5
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
How can that happen? Anybody else here with the same experience?
Are we talking about a bug here? I would really like to know if this is
a problem in my setup or if others are experiencing the same..
Arvinn
Trying to Update this morning gives:
Lint output: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
SARE_OBFU_SPL_ORDERING
lint: 1 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more information.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
87 matches
Mail list logo
