Re: Nigerian scam not catched by 3.10?

2005-10-07 Thread Menno van Bennekom
FYI: I tested 3.10 for a week now and indeed some (very few) Scams don't get hit anymore by 3.10 but more scams then before get hit by the new Scam-rules (Advance_fee) so all in all it is a positive change. Also for other spam it seems to do a better job because of new rules. Time to upgrade the

TextCat usage and language dependent rules

2005-10-07 Thread Alan Premselaar
I've looked thru the documentation and the wiki, etc. and haven't found any clear information on how to use the TextCat plugin. previously I used the config file switch ok_languages en ja ko ... after upgrading to 3.10 and uncommenting the textcat plugin spamassassin -D --lint isn't returning any

upgrade error spamassassin t/SATest.pm at line 592

2005-10-07 Thread B. Geier
Hello my os version is linux debian 3.1 (sarge) on my system SpamAssassin (version 3.0.2) is runing with Perl version 5.8.4. now i will upgrade to SpamAssassin 3.1 with cpan but every time i get this error: - cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin CPAN: Storable loaded ok

Re: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions

2005-10-07 Thread Alex Davidson
Well that confirms my suspicion on it not doing Content-Checking (quarantining messages based on content/attachments) - can anyone suggest something to do this? From the tutorials I've been following it looks like SA will hook into AV software (or vice versa) - I think the key is amavisd-new. I

Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

2005-10-07 Thread Bill Moseley
I'm stabbing in the dark a bit here, sorry. I had a server running Debian Woody which was running, IIRC[1], 2.6x. After upgrading to Sarge now running 3.0.3-2 and exim 4.50-8 the users are complaining of a lot more spam getting through. I'm now seeing it also -- looking at a few of my spam

RE: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

2005-10-07 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Bill Moseley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I had a server running Debian Woody which was running, IIRC[1], 2.6x. After upgrading to Sarge now running 3.0.3-2 and exim 4.50-8 the users are complaining of a lot more spam getting through. I'm now seeing it also -- looking at a few of my spam

RE: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

2005-10-07 Thread Matthew Lenz
Also make sure that if you are using bayes learning that spamassassin is still able to read the bayes_ files. There must have been some incompatibility with mine because I had to nuke everyones bayes_ files and return sa-learn so that bayes started kicking in again. Also the config problem that

RE: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

2005-10-07 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Matthew Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Also make sure that if you are using bayes learning that spamassassin is still able to read the bayes_ files. There must have been some incompatibility with mine because I had to nuke everyones bayes_ files and return sa-learn so that bayes

RE: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions

2005-10-07 Thread Mike Schrauder
Alex, Amavisd-new is the ticket. I use it w/ sa and clamav. Setting up the config for amavis was a real pain for me, but it works great now. I am trying to find the online tutorial that I used to set it up. Are you using it as a wall before mail gets to exchange? That is what I am

RE: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions

2005-10-07 Thread Mike Schrauder
Alex, http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/ I started w/ this tutorial to get some virtual domains working. It works well for those LOW traffic domains. Then I allowed postfix to relay some other domains to exchange (after sa and clamav told amavisd what's the

Re: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable

2005-10-07 Thread Bill Moseley
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:18:11AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: The most likely cause is a misconfigured trust path. 3.0.x introduced the ALL_TRUSTED rule. This rule is supposed to fire with a negative score if the message has not passed through any untrusted servers. A common problem is that

Re: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions

2005-10-07 Thread Alex Davidson
Yes Mike, I'm actually still pulling mail in with Mail Essentials as it has a nifty mail archiver built in (eventually I'd like to switch that to the linux box too), then I'm passing mail on to Postfix, then on to Exchange 2000. The whole whitelist/blacklist thing is next I guess, once I have the

Re: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions

2005-10-07 Thread Alex Davidson
Thanks! I'll take a look at this and see if I can figure out what's going on On 10/7/05, Mike Schrauder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/ I started w/ this tutorial to get some virtual domains working. It works well for

SPF_HELO

2005-10-07 Thread Bill Moseley
I installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and have a few questions. I understand the normal SPF lookup on the envelope sender's domain, but I'm not clear about the HELO SPF lookup. Is that explained somewhere? My other question is: is there a recommended score for the SPF_FAIL test? Thanks,

ALL_TRUSTED (was: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on Debian Stable)

2005-10-07 Thread Bill Moseley
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:57:10PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: If you don't specify trusted_networks or internal_networks, SA tries to guess at your network. It assumes that the first non-private IP that it sees is your external mail relay. If your frontline mailserver has a private IP, then

RE: ALL_TRUSTED (was: Spam increase after upgrade to 3.03 on De bian Stable)

2005-10-07 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Bill Moseley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:57:10PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: If you don't specify trusted_networks or internal_networks, SA tries to guess at your network. It assumes that the first non-private IP that it sees is your external mail relay. If

Re: Newbie: Postfix/Spamassassin Questions

2005-10-07 Thread jdow
From: Alex Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well that confirms my suspicion on it not doing Content-Checking (quarantining messages based on content/attachments) - can anyone suggest something to do this? Procmail, MailScanner, Amavis-new, and so forth. I use procmail. {^_^}

SA 3.1 Tools

2005-10-07 Thread Chris
Trying to run the bayes_dump_to_trusted_networks tool, with this on the cl: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin]$ sa-learn --dump | ./bayes_dump_to_trusted_networks --rdns trust.cf Trust.cf is created however when the script is done, the output is blank. Anyone know where I'm going wrong? --

STOCK_PICK

2005-10-07 Thread John Andersen
I had an enhanced score for STOCK_PICK, which is still listed on this page http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html as being one of the tests performed. However when movint to 3.10 I had to comment out that line in my local.cf because STOCK_PICK apparently no longer exists. As a result a

Razor 2 license

2005-10-07 Thread Chris Cooper
Is it possible to use Razor 2 for a business email server or is it limited to personal use only? Has anyone been able to obtain a license to do this or have you discontinued using Razor 2 with SpamAssassin? I couldn't find information on the couldmark web site and I haven't received a response to

Re: STOCK_PICK

2005-10-07 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello John, Friday, October 7, 2005, 5:26:58 PM, you wrote: JA 2 Was it a simple enough rule to be hand written as a JAuser rule, and if so, does any one know that it was? From SA 3.0.4: body STOCK_PICK/STOCK PICK/i describe STOCK_PICK Offers a picked

Configuration tool updated

2005-10-07 Thread michael moncur
My SpamAssassin Configuration Tool, which is linked from the SpamAssassin site and hasn't worked with 3.0 or 3.1, has finally been updated.http://www.yrex.com/spam/spamconfig.php It now works with 3.0 or 3.1, although 3.1 will need some edits to v310.pre for razor/dcc/textcat along with the