On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:12:25PM -0700, Ask List wrote:
linux and unix is unix. So I would like to hear users experiences using
different operating systems. Pros/Cons/Problems/Headaches/etc. The
operating systems I'm most interested in are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo,
Slackware,
[3086] error: Can't locate IO/Socket/SSL.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
which part of that error do you not understand?
Hello,
I'm getting this strange error with my SpamAssassin lately.
I googled for soulution, but none of patches that I found applied
clearly so I reversed every tryed patch.
spamassassin-3.1.0-4
Integrated with exim-4.54 (exiscan)
Error:
Apr 9 22:56:54 spamd[17021]: prefork: syswrite(7)
On Sunday 09 April 2006 15:20, mouss wrote:
No. white and black aren't colors. they are absence of colour:)
Well... according to physics... it really depends on what
is delivering the pigments...
When you paint.. and you combine a bunch of colors.. the colors
get darker and darker.. to the
Greetings List:
My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam
solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner +
Postfix + SA + MailWatch.
I have everything pretty much setup and it is working, however my spam
filtering is far from the 90th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JD Smith wrote:
Greetings List:
My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam
solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner +
Postfix + SA + MailWatch.
I have everything pretty much setup and it
Forwarding this as I was replying directly to martin for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: JD Smith
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:14 AM
To: 'Martin Hepworth'
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin Woes
My boss wanted me to flag mail coming in that doesn't have a valid RDNS
as spam.
How do I
Forwarding, I ws replying directly to Martin for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: JD Smith
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:51 AM
To: 'Martin Hepworth'
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin Woes
Aye, that's in my lint so I guess I do have that turned on. :)
I don't have a 88_FVGT_headers.cf
That is what I was beginning to suspect. Is there a way to untrain the
emails I ran through it? It was a pretty large selection.. A few
thousand of both spam and ham.
I turned on auto-learning so it should start to pick things up on it's
own without needing me to train it, no?
Training on a
JD Smith wrote:
That is what I was beginning to suspect. Is there a way to untrain the
emails I ran through it?
Feed them to sa-learn --forget.
It was a pretty large selection.. A few
thousand of both spam and ham.
I turned on auto-learning so it should start to pick things up on it's
own
Hello; Our company newsletter is not getting to some of our subscribers. My guess is it is ending up in junk mail folders. We have a section on relationship tips and I am concerned some of the content in this section could be triggering spam filters. I am working on a script that runs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RERE:We want approve yours loan l42kr9
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ca.geocities.com/nq92ra63ut5//
You have been approved for a $402,000
Good approach Herb, thanks
To anyone:
1) What is the highest weight value (in number of digits) supported
by SpamAssassin?
2) What is the smallest weigh value (in decimal places) supported by
SpamAssassin?
These might look like:
10
.01
Thanks,
Dan
Dan wrote:
Good approach Herb, thanks
To anyone:
1) What is the highest weight value (in number of digits) supported by
SpamAssassin?
2) What is the smallest weigh value (in decimal places) supported by
SpamAssassin?
In current practice, the range is 1000 to 0.0001. The code that
The total range for the mantissa of a double-precision float is 52-
bits, with 1
bit for sign. This means that the range between your most
significant and least
significant digit of the final summed answer cannot be greater than
2^51, or
you'll loose precision.
The total range for the
Dan wrote:
The total range for the mantissa of a double-precision float is
52-bits, with 1
bit for sign. This means that the range between your most significant
and least
significant digit of the final summed answer cannot be greater than
2^51, or
you'll loose precision.
The total range
No, I'm saying 15 digits. That's *total* combined between integer
and decimal
places.
However, because the floating point is stored in a scientific
notation, you can
add a bunch of extra zeros to push those 15 digits around.
So you can have:
(15 digits) + (307 zeros).0
or
0.(307 zeros)
I was having this problem for a while... then I added a confirmation block
to my guestbook - so that any post had to be confirmed.
Boom - spam stopped (I've never even gotten confirmation notices that they
tried again).
I did basically the same thing. I hacked PHPBB a little to throw an
I suppose I shouldn't be shocked by this but it surprised me to receive
some spam sent with Mailman.
I have a folder for catching all mailing list mail that doesn't yet have
its own procmail rule. The catch-all procmail rule looks for anything with
a List-Id header and dumps it in
Hello everybody,
Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the rules, they seem to be the
same.
Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
Hello everybody,
Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the
Heute (11.04.2006/02:40 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler,
The whole idea behind SA 0.1 through 3.0.5 was that if you needed new
rules, you upgraded your SA version. Rule updates were previously very
slow, due to the expensive mass-check process. New releases of SA code
came out much faster than new
Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
Hello everybody,
Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the
Thanks for such a quick reply. So upgrading would really be helpful in
terms of performance if nothing else. Ok, I'll give it a thought. Maybe
I'll find a Debian package with the latest version. Should be possible.
I installed SpamAssassin today for the first time and The Ultimate
Online
Side-note.. what version of SA did you diff against?
I downloaded Mail-SpamAssassin-current from the ftp. I thought that was
a link to the most current version. I might have been wrong.
All that said, you might be OK with debian's SA 3.0.2-3. While it's
important to be fairly current on SA,
Follow up question (even more odd than weight limits):
I want to flag all messages as spam, then configure various rules as
exceptions, marking them as ham. But how do I universally mark
messages one way in SpamAssassin and then unmark them in the other?
I realize this is unorthodox, but
I tried sa-learn, but don't you need a sizable spam collection for it to
work? The docs say that you need to collect about a thousand of ham and
spam messages before the training starts to work. That sounds like a
pain in the neck. Or am I missing something?
I ran sa-learn on this one message,
Dan wrote:
Follow up question (even more odd than weight limits):
I want to flag all messages as spam, then configure various rules as
exceptions, marking them as ham. But how do I universally mark
messages one way in SpamAssassin and then unmark them in the other?
I realize this is
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked as spam:
pts rule name description
-- --
-1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
1.1 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly
Screaming Eagle wrote:
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked as spam:
pts rule name description
--
--
-1.8 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
1.1
I second that.
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 8:29 PM
To: spam mailling list
Subject: Re: Internal email marked as spam...
Screaming Eagle wrote:
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Screaming Eagle wrote:
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked as spam:
pts rule name description
--
--
-1.8 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted
32 matches
Mail list logo
