On 6/3/2006 2:39 AM, spectacularstuff wrote:
Hi again Daryl,
I just need to know what you are asking to fix it. You know more than anyone
what is going on with it. I can bring your bid back to corporate on Monday.
Thanks for the reply. I was wondering if I was going to hear from you. :)
I'd
Hi again Daryl,
I just need to know what you are asking to fix it. You know more than anyone
what is going on with it. I can bring your bid back to corporate on Monday.
Thanks for the reply. I was wondering if I was going to hear from you. :)
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
http://www
I understand the issue of troubleshooting and repair.
How long I have worked on it is irrelavant as I have alreayd said, I don't
know what I am doing. If I did have the knowledge I would be able to fix it
and more than likely, quickly.
I personally work in computer repair, not in Server Setup or
On 6/2/2006 11:44 PM, spectacularstuff wrote:
We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail. We would like to
hire someone that is familiar with SpamAssassin and a Windows 2003
server system in order to come set this thing up so that our own emails
are not being detected as SPAM. Is any
You say the problem is 30 min to 2 hours. But you have been working on it
for how long and not fixed it?
You are probably over-simplifying the issue (maybe, maybe not). When you
quote a job you have to plan for worse case. Dealing with vendors, dns
issues, propagation issues, looking at the entire
If you are going to make remarks, please state all of the facts,
1. We do not require onsite service.
2. Guarantees are accepted.
3. Trying to justify the cost because propagation will take 2-3 days (which
you and I both know, usually takes 24 hours or less in most of the places.
72 hours is a f
Well, we already know you don't consider $1,000 for onsite service and a
money back guarantee reasonable.
;-)
> I would much rather fine someone to hire at a reasonable cost to
> come in and
> fix the errors that are making SA detect our own emails as SPAM.
>
> Wayne
> --
> View this message in
I am using the GUI interface for SA. I can also modify local.cf myself if
that is where you are talking about modifying it so the -D is in there.
Yes, our users are using their dynamic IPs from their comcast accounts, etc
etc etc.
I do understand that but what I am most interested in is the MX r
By the way - that is the last time I retrieve something from savefiles.
If wget does not work - forget it.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 20:45
Subject: website position spam
Spam detection software, running on the system "xxx.xxx.xxx", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
for details.
Content pr
OK, I take it SpamAssassin is running on Windows and not an "ix box"?
I hope you have some good luck tracking it down. Finding the expert you
need may be difficult. Can you modify whatever is running SpamAssassin
so that it adds a "-D " to the invocation of spamassassin or spamd as
appropriate? R
Thanks for the reply. Most of that is greek to me. I have spent the better
part of 3 weeks not knowing what I am doing attempting to get this fixed. I
don't have anymore time left. We are looking to hire someone to come in and
do this.
This is not a very complicated setup. There is no exchan
You have a bunch of problems; You have no PTR record for your MXs
except to the dead end of worldfamousgiftbaskets.net - That domain has bogus
Whois/registration data (i.e. "Not Given" is invalid). Also that domain has
no 'A' or 'MX' records. Your NS records in the TLD zone files don't m
Chris wrote:
> This one got a -0.4 for me and I'm pretty sure its spam. You can d/l the
> message here. Please let me know if you get anything different and what
> rules were hit. Here is the link - http://www.savefile.com/files/5914312
>
It looks like you might want to review your bayes tra
--On Friday, June 02, 2006 11:28 PM -0400 "Gary D. Margiotta"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, but his original e-mail said mail/Lists was for ham training,
nothing about spam, so that's why I put that in there. It really was a
quick and dirty answer, and in his other reply, there's more folder
Thanks, that handles the top level. ;)
Yeah, it was quick and simple for just the one scenario you had in your
e-mail.
Me, I redirect mail using a combo of procmail and Postfix header checks to
2 users on the border servers (hamfilter and spamfilter), then I do 2
nightly script runs to sa-
This one got a -0.4 for me and I'm pretty sure its spam. You can d/l the
message here. Please let me know if you get anything different and what
rules were hit. Here is the link - http://www.savefile.com/files/5914312
Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
We already have SA setup and working with Smartermail.
We would like to hire someone that is familiar with SpamAssassin and a Windows 2003 server system in order to come set this thing up so that our own emails are not being detected as SPAM.
Is anyone interested in this?
If you are interested l
Gary, doesn't that presuppose that the mail/lists directory does not
contain a spam list?
Yep, but his original e-mail said mail/Lists was for ham training, nothing
about spam, so that's why I put that in there. It really was a quick and
dirty answer, and in his other reply, there's more fold
Gary, doesn't that presuppose that the mail/lists directory does not
contain a spam list?
I also sense a lack of spam training here. One sided Bayes training is
not a good thing.
{^_^}
From: "Gary D. Margiotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#!/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbo
On Friday, June 02, 2006 10:51 PM -0400 "Gary D. Margiotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
# !/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbox $x
done
Thanks, that handles the top level. ;)
I figure I'll need to do something like:
find mail/Lists -type f -exec sa-learn --ham
#!/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbox $x
done
-Gary
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Friday, June 02, 2006 9:47 PM -0400 JamesDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How many messages have you trained? You'll need 200 each to get it going,
and I recommen
On Friday, June 02, 2006 9:47 PM -0400 JamesDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How many messages have you trained? You'll need 200 each to get it going,
and I recommend at least a thousand of each to really get it going.
I use procmail to distribute my mail to over a hundred folders in a large
tr
David Goldsmith wrote:
We are running SA 3.1.0. Reading this thread today, I just found the
SARE_STOCKS ruleset. I updated the rules_du_jour script and pulled down
the ruleset. Have received some messages already that are being caught.
Some others are making it through with scores of 6.7 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:41 PM -0400 DAve
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Currently 3.0.4 on the toasters, 3.0.2 on the MailScanner boxes. These
>> may or may not get updates this month. I've never been fond of "update"
On Fri Jun 02 at 09:38:32 AM, List Mail User wrote:
> There are more problems here than just being at the leading edge
> of a spam-run (DNS and net test timeouts maybe?).
Actually, I just figured out a major part of the problem.
[10971] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
I'm no
--On Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:41 PM -0400 DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Currently 3.0.4 on the toasters, 3.0.2 on the MailScanner boxes. These
may or may not get updates this month. I've never been fond of "update"
as a solution to a problem unless I know the change in version will
directly
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
The reason I chose MyDNS was it was MySQL based and could be updated
live. And I thought that if I added a field that set an expiration of
now+24 hours then I could expire old entries with a simple script.
rbldns
> I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is
> there a quick
> guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
> server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way it will get the
> mails before, filter and then forward them to exchange unchanged?.
http://wiki.apach
>There are more problems here than just being at the leading edge
> of a spam-run (DNS and net test timeouts maybe?).
Unresponsive DNS could be a contributing factor. I used to use djbdns as a
local caching name server but found that on my setup it degraded over time
(could have been the w
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:38:32AM -0700, List Mail User wrote:
> >My guess is that these came in before any of razor, uribl, etc, got ahold of
> >them. I just checked them all:
[...]
> Many of the name servers involved have been SBL listed for weeks.
> Also his Bayes failed horribly on some
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
> The reason I chose MyDNS was it was MySQL based and could be updated
> live. And I thought that if I added a field that set an expiration of
> now+24 hours then I could expire old entries with a simple script.
rbldnsd can be updated semi-live. Every "check
Michaux Julien wrote:
> Yes I use amavis...
>
> So it's in the amavis configuration that I have to set the
> required_score? Do you know it is?
Search amavisd.conf for "sa_tag_level". This should find all of the
score settings for amavis.
Amavis is much more flexible than SA alone and has more
>...
>My guess is that these came in before any of razor, uribl, etc, got ahold of
>them. I just checked them all:
>
>score=3D43.64
>score=3D16.961
>score=3D24.61
>score=3D13.893
>score=3D10.81
>score=3D34.878
>score=3D39.367
>score=3D23.321
>score=3D41.673
>score=3D47.624
>score=3D36.642
>score=3
Julien Michaux wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem using spamassassin. The required_score option
> doesn't work...
>
> I use the lastest spamassassin version, postfix 2.2, clamav,
> courier-imap and openLDAP. My operating system is Debian testing with
> kernel 2.6.12.
>
> I set the r
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Julien Michaux wrote:
> I use the lastest spamassassin version, postfix 2.2, clamav, courier-imap
> and openLDAP. My operating system is Debian testing with kernel 2.6.12.
There's something else too which you didn't list.
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.65
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:37:19AM -0700, Sean Harding wrote:
> Here are several example messages that have gotten through in the last day
> or so (including the scores they got):
>
> http://dogcow.org/tmp/spam-misses-20060602/
>
> I have SA installed locally in my home di
Hi everybody,I have a problem using spamassassin. The required_score option doesn't work...I
use the lastest spamassassin version, postfix 2.2, clamav, courier-imap
and openLDAP. My operating system is Debian testing with kernel 2.6.12.I set the required_score option to 5 and when I received a spa
le messages that have gotten through in the last day
>or so (including the scores they got):
>
>http://dogcow.org/tmp/spam-misses-20060602/
>
>I have SA installed locally in my home dir, running through procmail (no
>spamd/spamc involvement). I theoretically have network checks on
tten through in the last day
or so (including the scores they got):
http://dogcow.org/tmp/spam-misses-20060602/
I have SA installed locally in my home dir, running through procmail (no
spamd/spamc involvement). I theoretically have network checks on (I'm not
running SA with '-L').
> Bayes, arrgg!! More than once I've been given examples of bayes being
> the solution I need. I really really really want bayes to
> work. But each
> time I set it up, the db gets huge, scan times go through the
> roof, and
> I end up disappointed. The one time it worked for me I ended
> up traini
"spamassassin time out" can be caused by slow dns lookups. I assume you
are using the rbls in S.A., and not MailScanner? Are you running a local
caching nameserver?
What do `vmstat` and `free` say? Any swap in use? If yes, get more ram.
1gb ram would be a good place to start for a MailScanner/
; Here are several example messages that have gotten through in the
> last day or so (including the scores they got):
>
> http://dogcow.org/tmp/spam-misses-20060602/
>
> I have SA installed locally in my home dir, running through procmail
> (no spamd/spamc involvement). I theo
last day
or so (including the scores they got):
http://dogcow.org/tmp/spam-misses-20060602/
I have SA installed locally in my home dir, running through procmail (no
spamd/spamc involvement). I theoretically have network checks on (I'm not
running SA with '-L').
Any thoughts on what
Ramprasad wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 19:52 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm thinking about using MyDNS to create my own DNS blacklist. I'm
thinking I'll make it available to everyone to list IPs that are not on
other lists. Mostly virus infected zombies and such.
So - has anyon
Spamassassin -D --lint
Might show you
where its getting hung up. Also where did you exactly add the rule
HTMAL_MESSAGE? What file, what dir?
Can you run TOP
and see your memory usage?
--Chris
-Original Message-From: yossim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 02, 2
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 19:52 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'm thinking about using MyDNS to create my own DNS blacklist. I'm
> thinking I'll make it available to everyone to list IPs that are not on
> other lists. Mostly virus infected zombies and such.
>
> So - has anyone else done this? Looking
1. SA3.x seems to need a little more memory + cpu than 2.x. If you can't add
memory just up the time-out value for your milter or other piping mechanism
you're using.
2. Lots and lots and then lots more has changed in the configuration between
2.64 and 3.1.1. Read the documentation on configur
48 matches
Mail list logo
