On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
> I'm younger than the folks that REALLY learned to spell.
>
> And I do wonder why I made that typo. Either of my parents would have
> had my skin for doing that.
>
> {O.O}
*I* gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you'd done it on
purpose for illustrativ
...In other words, a single user can, at a click of a button,
bring down a dual processor mailer with SA for two hours,
Sounds to me like it would be worth an entry in Bugzilla.
Loren
I'm younger than the folks that REALLY learned to spell.
And I do wonder why I made that typo. Either of my parents would have
had my skin for doing that.
{O.O}
- Original Message -
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 20
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
illiterate.
In the righting? I
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
illiterate.
In the right
righting? is that the opposite of wronging? :-)
On Aug 9, 2006, at 7:19 PM, jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
il
jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
illiterate.
In the righting? I think you spelt that wrong. :)
From: "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theo wrote (in part):
sa-update is a generic tool that lets users download
"channels" (ie: bundles
of rules/plugins) from anywhere that decides to publish them
(requires a
certain setup, etc.) At the moment, the only published
channel that I know
of
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There's nothing stoping the SARE folks from publishing a single or a
bunch of channels and getting rid of RDJ in favor of sa-update if they
wanted to... There are some benefits either way I suppose, and I'm biased
towards sa-update of course. :|
Um,
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are functionally
illiterate.
{O.O} So says the old fartess curmudgeonette.
- Original Message -
From:
> -Original Message-
> From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5:31 PM
> To: Spamassassin List; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Improved OCR Plugin with approximate matching
>
>
[snip]
>
> According to google, libungif seems correct for yum.
- Original Message -
From: "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Improved OCR Plugin with approximate matching
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Re
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
>
> >> which is already handled by SA core modules. I'm assuming that SA only
> >> decodes an attachment once and reuses it for any plugin that n
Justin,
> Mark -- can you mail a *real* sample? private mail would be fine.
It is coming your way (private) in a minute or two.
It is a real sample, the only change I made is to
replace the From and To header, so that it looks like
a mail from me to you, subject: promotional video ...
Watch out
Mark -- can you mail a *real* sample? private mail would be fine.
--j.
Mark Martinec writes:
> I recently noticed a couple of cases where SA (3.1.4 or earlier)
> would take over a minute (instead of few seconds) to check a 500 kB
> message. Investigation reavealed that cases have one thing in c
On 2006-08-09, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I used to run SA on a 256 meg 66 MHz Pentium that was also the firewall.
> It was erm ahm slow, VERY slow. But it ran. This was in the 2.6.3 days
> give or take some.)
I run SA on FreeBSD on an IBM M-Pro dual PII-400 with 512MB RAM.
Sendmail, IMA
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
which is already handled by SA core modules. I'm assuming that SA only
decodes an attachment once and reuses it for any plugin that needs it.
Yes -- the decode run happens once and th
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> >> I was envisioning all of those tests in a single plugin, with
> >> configuration options to control whether or not the OCR itself (fuzzy
> >> or not) takes place and whether the size analysis takes place and...
> >>
> >> There are lots of analyses th
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> which is already handled by SA core modules. I'm assuming that SA only
> decodes an attachment once and reuses it for any plugin that needs it.
Yes -- the decode run happens once and the result is stored in the
tree node/object wh
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
Could the image-size calculation stuff from the ImageInfo plugin be
merged into this?
I was envisioning all of those tests in a single plugin, with
configuration options to control whether or not the OCR itself (fuzzy
or not) takes pla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
>> Spamassassin List wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>
> Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support
> png, invoked giffix for broken gifs,
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
invoked giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic
bytes and not by content-type, added various configuration
options.
I ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
>>> decoder wrote:
>>>
>>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>>>
>>> Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
>>> invoked giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic
>>> byte
Mark Martinec wrote:
...In other words, a single user can, at a click of a button,
bring down a dual processor mailer with SA for two hours,
by sending a 70 MB video clip, and his Outlook Express
will happily do the dirty work for him, splitting a mail
into 190 chunks. What does a user know, he j
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
by content-type, added various configuration options.
I install the above plugin, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Expertsites, Inc. wrote:
>> decoder wrote:
>>
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>>
>> Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
>> giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
> > Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
> > form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
> > It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
> > support as well as a central update facility. This
> > coul
> I recently noticed a couple of cases where SA (3.1.4 or earlier)
> would take over a minute (instead of few seconds) to check a 500 kB
> message. ...
...In other words, a single user can, at a click of a button,
bring down a dual processor mailer with SA for two hours,
by sending a 70 MB video c
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
Could the image-size calculation stuff from the ImageInfo plugin be
merged into this?
I was envisioning all of those tests in a single plugin, with
configuration options to control whether or not the OCR itself (fuzzy
or not) takes place and whether the
Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gregory T Pelle wrote:
> > Loren Wilton wrote:
> > > > I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert,
> > > > but it doesnt appear that this rule will trigger on normal
> > > > things like "Dear Jim"
> > > >
> > > > body DEAR_SOMETHING
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
could be done as a gateway to sa-update, p
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gregory T Pelle wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it doesnt
appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like "Dear Jim"
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
by content-type, added various configuration options.
Feedback is welcome :)
Chris
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
> > Hrm. How much, if any, image processing is duplicated across the
> > imageinfo/OCR/fuzzyOCR plugins? It might be a benefit to merge them
> > and expose some options to control which tests are performed.
>
> Well, for example with gif, FuzzyOCR first checks
Hi,
I think i've tried everything Bayesian isn't scoring, not only once,
never. Never any Bayes_XX score.
Here's the results for sa-learn --dump magic|grep token :
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 4795 0 non-token data
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, wrote:
I have been having FPs from Ebay in AU and DE, as well as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have a good whitelist for
Theo wrote (in part):
>
> sa-update is a generic tool that lets users download
> "channels" (ie: bundles
> of rules/plugins) from anywhere that decides to publish them
> (requires a
> certain setup, etc.) At the moment, the only published
> channel that I know
> of is updates.spamassassin.org
Title: RE: HTML-tests good or bad?
ROFL!! I just saw this thread!
I haven't played hockey since January :( And still my spelling hasn't improved!
I am in fact, a product of the US skool system ;)
And if you're a Boston Bruins Hockey fan, today is a GREAT DAY!
http://sports.espn.go.c
I recently noticed a couple of cases where SA (3.1.4 or earlier)
would take over a minute (instead of few seconds) to check a 500 kB
message. Investigation reavealed that cases have one thing in common:
these were all message/partial chunks of a longish transfer of some
document or other data. More
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it
doesnt appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like "Dear
Jim"
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor|travell?er|car
shopper|web)\b/i
describe
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
>>> rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
>> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
>
> That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
>
>> i though sa-update updates the SA distro's bun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
(just pulling this out of the other thread ... my bad)
> Are you using the updated version OR the one originally posted?
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup *plugin* updates a
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:04 AM
Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
>
> But still this mail is getting thru
> http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
>
I tested your
Matthew V wrote:
Hi there,
Hello.
Server: qmail vpopmail simscan-1.2 spamassassin-3 clamav
good
Client: Win2k/XP with Office 2003
not so good
I've been trying to get Outlook 2003 to automatically deposit mail
marked by spamassassin as spam into its junk email folder. What I'm
look
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
> > rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
>
> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
> i though sa-update updates the SA distro's bundled rules, but NOT any
> add
Hi there,
Server: qmail vpopmail simscan-1.2 spamassassin-3 clamav
Client: Win2k/XP with Office 2003
I've been trying to get Outlook 2003 to automatically deposit mail marked by
spamassassin as spam into its junk email folder. What I'm looking for is a
built-in junk filter rule for Outlook tha
Richard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULESETS"
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that sente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
>> can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
>> i'd guess more than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULESETS"
>
> everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that sentence.
> r
Hi
i am reading the link http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
then the .pm file and do not have a plugins directory. where does the .pm
file go?
i assume the .cf goes in /etc/mail/spamassassin
and i edit v310.pre then restart spamd
Mark
Reginaldo Bray Mendoza wrote:
What can we do to avoid this??.. is there another way we can secure our
whitelist users rather than use spamassassin's whitelist_from rule???
Use whitelist_from_rcvd or whitelist_from_spf instead of just
whitelist_from.
whitelist_from_rcvd takes both an address
Reginaldo Bray Mendoza wrote:
Good day.
I have spamassassin working with MailScanner in a redhat linux machine.
Recently, we are receiving SPAM that claims to be from some users that
are on whitelist and, for that reason, spamassassin marks them as NOT
SPAM (user in whitelist rule scores -1
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it doesnt
appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like "Dear Jim"
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor|travell?er|car
shopper|web)\b/i
describe DEAR_SOMETHING
On Wed, August 9, 2006 16:39, Richard wrote:
>
> can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
> i'd guess more than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULESETS"
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
--
Benny
Menno wrote:
> Ramprasad wrote:
> >
> > But still this mail is getting thru
> > http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
> >
> I tested your mail here with the latest imageinfo.pm and it comes through
> indeed. The exact same one in .gif (same text, same background)
> was detected
> though. It wa
I had a similar, less expensive thought; Checking the global color
table in the header of all of the gif images in a particular message. I
tested a couple of spam cases and the GCTs are identical in all of my
limited number of test cases.
Logan Shaw wrote:
> Looks like people have started to ge
Ramprasad wrote:
>
> But still this mail is getting thru
> http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
>
I tested your mail here with the latest imageinfo.pm and it comes through
indeed. The exact same one in .gif (same text, same background) was detected
though. It was even my first and only i
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
>
> Updates:
> - added optimization changes by Theo Van Dinter
> - added jpeg support
> - added function image_named()
> - added function image_size_exact()
> - added function image_size_range()
> - added function image_to_text_ratio()
>
>
>
Gregory T Pelle wrote:
What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
know that our customer support emails
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 23:04 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
> > Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > >
> > > I use Courier MTA. Courier MTA replaces certain mailformed mails
> > > with mails which contain some explaination and the original mail
> > > as an attachment. The attachment
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:59:30AM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >The point is really moot. What files are in what directories doesn't
> >really matter. It seems the idea is that anyone reading all the
> >documentation, and the wiki, should be able to discern what will go
> >where, in what
* Gregory T Pelle wrote (09/08/06 15:14):
> What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
>
> I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
>
> and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
> kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Are you using the updated version OR the one originally posted?
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULE
Ramprasad wrote:
All my rulesets and the LARGO rules are for catching inline png and
inline gif. Now I am getting stock spams with
images like
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C6BBE8.11C02650--
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6BBE8.11BB4450
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="militarism.jpg"
Content-T
Hello,
SA 3.1.4
exec /usr/bin/spamd -v -m 32 -D -q -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
I am using vpopmail installation, and use /user perfs, for /user bayes and
other user conf is stored in SQL.
Problem:
If a mail comes in, and no real vpopmail user is present (smtproutes), than
SA pick's a random real
All my rulesets and the LARGO rules are for catching inline png and
inline gif. Now I am getting stock spams with
images like
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C6BBE8.11C02650--
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6BBE8.11BB4450
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="militarism.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: b
On Wed, August 9, 2006 16:14, Terry wrote:
> Our OWA server sits inside of our network. I just tried sending an
> email to a valid outside recipient. The email wasnt anything crazy
> but here are the tests that were ran:
>
> FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML=2.514,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS=2.369,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
Hello,
Our OWA server sits inside of our network. I just tried sending an
email to a valid outside recipient. The email wasnt anything crazy
but here are the tests that were ran:
FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML=2.514,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS=2.369,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126,MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.
What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
know that our customer support emails have the first line
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
> For some reason I thought he was. If he's a United Statesian then
> whainheck is he spelling British fashion?
Maybe he's seeking a little class?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174p
Good
day.
I have
spamassassin working with MailScanner in a redhat linux machine.
Recently, we are receiving SPAM that claims to be from
some users that are on whitelist and, for that reason, spamassassin marks them
as NOT SPAM (user in whitelist rule scores -100).
What
can we do to
For some reason I thought he was. If he's a United Statesian then whainheck
is he spelling British fashion?
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
But of the British it takes a Harry Potter to spell correctly.
(I know he's Canadian. Bu
From: "Michel Vaillancourt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>Based on the bad case I ran his
machine should do on the order of 10 to 30 seconds per email depending
on the speed of his processor. At 30 seconds per that gives him the
capacity, with delays to be sure, for 3000 emails per day. When they
come i
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to make it
easier for gocr):
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif
and converted to pnm:
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
And here's what gocr -i ocrmail.pnm spits out in my
jdow wrote:
But of the British it takes a Harry Potter to spell correctly.
(I know he's Canadian. But if carried too far British spelling
smells, or in the past tense is fishy, smelt.)
I know, like a sane person, Chris likes hockey (don't worry Chris, it
starts real soon), but WTH did he beco
> <>Based on the bad case I ran his
> machine should do on the order of 10 to 30 seconds per email depending
> on the speed of his processor. At 30 seconds per that gives him the
> capacity, with delays to be sure, for 3000 emails per day. When they
> come in batched there will be several minutes o
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this l
Ramprasad wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:27 +0200, Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place somet
When using amavisd-new a ramdisk. Ralf Hildebrandt has setup a small page
about it:
http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix/amavisd_tmpfs.shtml
He says it gives some optimalization.
Regards,
Xander
From: "Bjorn Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:27 +0200, Bjorn Jensen wrote:
> Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
> The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
> doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
> things up if I could place something on a ramdi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
>> Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to
>> make it easier for gocr):
>> http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif and converted to pnm:
>> http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
>>
>> And here's what
Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to make it
easier for gocr):
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif
and converted to pnm:
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
And here's what gocr -i ocrmail.pnm spits out in my case:
http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmai
I see a lot of people are getting invitations to join some yahoo group.
And many of these are not exactly "appropriate". ( porn )
If I get invitations to a group by someone I dont know, then I think it
is spam.
Thanks
Ram
Bjorn Jensen wrote:
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to the
question, does
From: "Bjorn Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads
From: "Nigel Frankcom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
{^_-} Joanne, who has a bad habit if running numbers. And I note he
might be able to run two instances to get SOME benefit from
paralleling the DNS lookups.
Point conceded :-D
<> That's DEADLY in political arguments when I bother to t
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?
The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd
doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed
things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to the
question, does spamassassin do any
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:10:59 -0700, "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Nigel Frankcom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
>>> "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
The largest factor to take into consideration is how much mail SA will
be dealing with. Running a single child will be limiting, if you are
getting anything more than a few hundred mails per day that hardware
will be insufficient. You will either hit long delays or mail wil
From: "Nigel Frankcom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey all!
>
> Anyone happen to k
decoder wrote:
decoder wrote:
decoder wrote:
Hello there,
I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
intentional obfuscations in the text don't make t
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
>> "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> > Hey all!
>>> >
>>> > Anyone happen to know the memory re
Hi
I have some troubles getting good results using gocr on some of the pics
that came in.
Strangely Chris from the FuzzyOCR Plugin was able to scan them correctly
but we didn't find out why there's so much of a difference
I'm using gocr-0.40-3 on SuSE 10.1 and netpbm-10.26.12-5.4 (for giftopn
From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "James Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey all!
>
> Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
> have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plu
DAve wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Updates are variable... they go in /var. Anywhere else wouldn't be
following FHS.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Daryl
The point is really moot. What files are in what directories doesn't
really matter. It seems the idea is that anyone reading all t
94 matches
Mail list logo