I retried that and it still does the same thing.
In make test however I find some errors, they dont seem to stop the
process, so it appears as if Net::DNS can live without them, if you
will.
##
make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl
Perl, Spamassassin and most of the modules were installed via Yum.
I have currently uninstalled Spamassassin, Net::DNS + depeds, and am
going to install via cpan. Funny thing was Mail::SPF::Query when I
installed from cpan had a deped that was needed, and it was something
like Mail::Hostheader
-Original Message-
From: Dan McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zondag 5 november 2006 15:00
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin --lint fails - undefined symbol
Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY
I'm looking to run SA on some mailing list mail that's constantly
getting bombarded by asian spam.
So I would like the check to be as efficient as possible such that as
soon as I know the mail has asian character sets or unwanted language
I don't want it to check
any more. Any chance I can
Okay I got it to work about 30 minutes after sending, but right before
I could send an email we had a power outage. :(
Anyway I uninstalled serveral of the Yum installed perl modules and
spamassassin and reinstalled via CPAN, while doing that one of the
Net::DNS depeds said that there was a
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
So? Build something better. Its open source. Don't use the RFCI scores,
drop them, stop bithing about somehting YOU can change.
Well, I've added a -2 for email from Amazon, but I thought other people
might like a warning. No need to flame someone
On 1 Nov 2006, Andreas Pettersson stated:
Steven Dickenson wrote:
I can't agree with this. Many small businesses in the US get just these
kind of static connections from broadband ISPs.
Comcast, for example, has all of their static customers using rDNS that
would fail your tests, and
On 31 Oct 2006, John Rudd verbalised:
And, while I may be a little unyielding wrt to people whose ISPs are
like Telecom Italia, I'm not unsympathetic. I think, in this case, if
Italy did get mass quarantined by the rest of the world, it might
cause enough of an uproar to force Telecom Italia
Nix wrote:
On 1 Nov 2006, Andreas Pettersson stated:
Steven Dickenson wrote:
I can't agree with this. Many small businesses in the US get just these kind
of static connections from broadband ISPs.
Comcast, for example, has all of their static customers using rDNS that would
fail your
I like the ability to give individual scores to the various tests... Per my
patch.. Allows for minor tweaking for each kind of issue.
- Original Message -
From: John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andreas Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Steven Dickenson
[EMAIL
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I'm looking to run SA on some mailing list mail that's constantly
getting bombarded by asian spam.
So I would like the check to be as efficient as possible such that
as soon as I know the mail has asian character sets or unwanted
language I don't
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
Well, I've added a -2 for email from Amazon, but I thought other
people might like a warning. No need to flame someone who's trying
to help.
RFCi and SA is a somewhat sensitive topic here, as you'll see if you
check the archives from about a month back.
Help!
I am trying to get spamassassin 3.1.7 working with net-qmail 1.05 and
vpopmail 5.4.16. It's not going too well.
I have the QMAILQUEUE patch applied and am using the
qmail-scanner-queue.pl script in an attempt to get spamassassin working.
The juxt of the problem: scanc is reporting
Robert Nicholson writes:
I'm looking to run SA on some mailing list mail that's constantly
getting bombarded by asian spam.
So I would like the check to be as efficient as possible such that as
soon as I know the mail has asian character sets or unwanted language
I don't want it to
Can you copy/paste your header here please? The one with spamd and the one with spamassassin .2006/11/5, Ron Gage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Help!I am trying to get spamassassin 3.1.7 working with net-qmail 1.05 and
vpopmail 5.4.16.It's not going too well.I have the QMAILQUEUE patch applied and am using
François Rousseau wrote:
Can you copy/paste your header here please? The one with spamd and
the one with spamassassin .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.7# spamc sample-spam.txt
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on
host-l1.mi-connect.com
Hi all,
Spam filtering is working, but I'm getting about half the spam in my
mailbox. Anyone have tips on adjustments I could make?
Here's what I have in the local.cf file:
rewrite_header SUBJECT **SPAM**
dns_available yes
required_score 4.0
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayesfiles/bayes
On Sunday 05 November 2006 15:48, Brian S. Meehan wrote:
Hi all,
Spam filtering is working, but I'm getting about half the spam in my
mailbox. Anyone have tips on adjustments I could make?
Here's what I have in the local.cf file:
rewrite_header SUBJECT **SPAM**
dns_available yes
Ron Gage wrote:
Help!
I am trying to get spamassassin 3.1.7 working with net-qmail 1.05 and
vpopmail 5.4.16. It's not going too well.
I have the QMAILQUEUE patch applied and am using the
qmail-scanner-queue.pl script in an attempt to get spamassassin working.
The juxt of the problem:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Ron Gage wrote:
Help!
I am trying to get spamassassin 3.1.7 working with net-qmail 1.05 and
vpopmail 5.4.16. It's not going too well.
I have the QMAILQUEUE patch applied and am using the
qmail-scanner-queue.pl script in an attempt to get spamassassin working.
The juxt
On Sat, November 4, 2006 02:34, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Not a false positive if their servers are broken.
True from the RFCI point of view, but NOT true from the SpamAssassin point
of view. These messages are wanted by their recipients so should not be
On Fri, November 3, 2006 11:53, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Due to the dynamic nature of this test, I guess that at least in the postfix
case it should need to be somehow embedded into the greylisting server: it
seems postfix doesn't allow to specify more than one policy server in the
What would cause all messages to score 0.5 on everything?
23 matches
Mail list logo
