Don't feed the animals ?
I must have been dreaming when I saw the post about this and OT posts
(said he joining in an OT post)
Now we have nigerian spam that actually refers to compensating victims
of scam
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/nigerian.txt
The spammer is insane. Does he thing a real victim would be foolish
enough to fall in his trap again
OTOH
Unfortunately , this mail went clean thru all my SA-rules ( SA
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 00:26 -0400, François Rousseau wrote:
Hello,
I have recently change my SA server for another really similar server
but many software version have change between the 2 servers (include
SA 3.1.7 -- 3.2.3)
My old server scan the messages much faster (around 3-4 seconds
ram wrote:
Now we have nigerian spam that actually refers to compensating
victims of scam
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/nigerian.txt
The spammer is insane. Does he thing a real victim would be foolish
enough to fall in his trap again
OTOH
Unfortunately , this mail went clean thru all
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
SA 3.2.x already does this, you just need to know how. Read the docs on
the shortcircuit plugin, and the priority option for rules:
Shortcircuit allows you to define when to bail out
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 08:38 +0200, Rob Sterenborg wrote:
ram wrote:
Now we have nigerian spam that actually refers to compensating
victims of scam
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/nigerian.txt
The spammer is insane. Does he thing a real victim would be foolish
enough to fall in his
Crocomoth wrote:
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
SA 3.2.x already does this, you just need to know how. Read the docs on
the shortcircuit plugin, and the priority option for rules:
Shortcircuit allows you to define when to bail out
Hmm. Do you have shell access? It's not necessary, but it'll make
things easier if you do.
No, I don't have shell access. I can access the file space by FTP, though.
How big are each of those files?
auto-whitelist = 0.7MB
bayes_journal = 70kB
bayes_seen = 0.3MB
bayes_toks = 5.3MB
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
1. Using this method, admin must understand that the fate of every
message
(for all users) will depend from the single rule.
Not if you set it up properly.. You can have multiple rules run with a
very early priority (low number), then have another one run with a
This is probably going to be a stupid question, but how do I go about
implementing patches like this? Should this file be copied in place of the
file located here?:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/
- Skip
2007/9/13, Skip [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is probably going to be a stupid question, but how do I go about
implementing patches like this? Should this file be copied in place of the
file located here?:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/
- Skip
ASQ (another stupid question):
I have noted one FP so far, lists.sophos.com and it was sending the latest
new viruses, I get this list a couple times per day on average
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 1:26 PM
To: SpamAssassin Users List
Hi Group,
I was wondering, setting up a mailserver with spamassassin and optionaly
amavis and/or mailscanner takes a big amount of time if you want to do
it right.
Is there a system or set of scripts that can speed things up and maybe
with some dialoques to configure a debian or redhat box
My bad, I had 127.0.0.1 in the blacklist on that host instead of 127.0.0.2
Sorry
-Original Message-
From: Rick Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 9:03 AM
To: 'Marc Perkel'; 'SpamAssassin Users List'
Subject: RE: List of 600,000 IP addresses of
Rense Buijen wrote:
Hi Group,
I was wondering, setting up a mailserver with spamassassin and optionaly
amavis and/or mailscanner takes a big amount of time if you want to do
it right.
Is there a system or set of scripts that can speed things up and maybe
with some dialoques to configure a
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:33 -0500, Skip wrote:
This is probably going to be a stupid question, but how do I go about
implementing patches like this? Should this file be copied in place of the
file located here?:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/
No problems. You could
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 15:12 +0200, Rense Buijen wrote:
Hi Group,
I was wondering, setting up a mailserver with spamassassin and optionaly
amavis and/or mailscanner takes a big amount of time if you want to do
it right.
Is there a system or set of scripts that can speed things up and maybe
Yeah - 127.0.0.1 means white listed. :)
Rick Cooper wrote:
My bad, I had 127.0.0.1 in the blacklist on that host instead of 127.0.0.2
newby 23 wrote:
How do I disable AWL?
Not sure; check the docs for the version of SA you're using. It *has*
changed more than once in the last year or so IIRC.
My users_prefs file does not currently have a bayes_expiry_max_db_size
option in it. Do I simply add one, setting a smaller
I just got one and it sailed through SA here, too, as it had a 400+Kb
JPEG attachment. It seems they are attacking via SA message size
limits now.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key:
Guess that's not a throwaway dial up connection then. Wow. I'd think
that size would make the cost/benefit analysis skew even further to making
a spam run unprofitable as they'd be sending so many fewer before they're
shut down.
--
Rick Zeman
Manager of Information Technology
Melwood
Crocomoth wrote:
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
1. Using this method, admin must understand that the fate of every
message
(for all users) will depend from the single rule.
Not if you set it up properly.. You can have multiple rules run with a
very early priority (low number), then have
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
Guess that's not a throwaway dial up connection then. Wow. I'd think
that size would make the cost/benefit analysis skew even further to making
a spam run unprofitable as they'd be sending so many fewer before they're
shut down.
Matt's generally nailed it.
I would say that it should be easy enough to write a plugin which reorders
rule priorities into a desired order, then implements the
have_shortcircuited plugin hook to return 1 at the desired point... so
if anyone feels like trying it out to see if they can make an
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:24:08AM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
How do I disable AWL?
Not sure; check the docs for the version of SA you're using. It *has*
changed more than once in the last year or so IIRC.
It's still the same use_auto_whitelist 0, though it's recommended to just
not load
On 9/13/07, Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if anyone feels like trying it out to see if they can make an
auto-shortcircuiting plugin which outperforms base SpamAssassin over a
mixed corpus of 50:50 nonspam and spam, go for it ;)
I dunno about your mail, but if it outperformed base SA
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:24:08AM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
How do I disable AWL?
Not sure; check the docs for the version of SA you're using. It *has*
changed more than once in the last year or so IIRC.
It's still the same use_auto_whitelist 0, though
From: Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Is there any chance we can get a moderator on this, please? This is
clearly not a SA topic and I'm weary of insults, flames, and
advertisements
from Marc.
You guys are almost as good as smurf
From: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 2007, September 13 14:24
Subject: Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers
From: Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Is there any chance we can get a moderator on this,
On Thursday 13 September 2007, jdow wrote:
And you just fed the troll-chain, yourself, silly person.
{^_-}
At least I trim my replies...
--
Phil Barnett
AI4OF
SKCC #600
Hi,
An inordinate amount of people are telling me I'm
ending up in spam folders, so I wondered if there was
some objective site where I might be able to run a
message through and have it score an email. I realize this
could also be used by spammers to check about getting past
the
me too!
hitler!
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Phil Barnett wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007, jdow wrote:
And you just fed the troll-chain, yourself, silly person.
{^_-}
At least I trim my replies...
--
Phil Barnett
AI4OF
SKCC #600
At 05:35 PM 9/13/2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
An inordinate amount of people are telling me I'm
ending up in spam folders, so I wondered if there was
some objective site where I might be able to run a
message through and have it score an email. I realize this
could also be used
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jason Burzenski wrote:
How would you account for negative scoring rules? (if your message hit's
score=5 it may soon be socre=-2 after a negative scoring rule is
applied).
It is stupid simple - run them first. :)
--
Michał Jęczalik, +48.603.64.62.97
INFONAUTIC,
34 matches
Mail list logo
