not007 wrote:
I am using cpanel 11 and being told that I can't get spamassassin to rewrite
the subject of emails that are spam. Spam assassin IS adding info in the
header like:
X-Spam-Subject: [SPAM] test message
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1002.4
X-Spam-Score: 10024
X-Spam-Bar:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
--
Get my PGP Public key here:
http://pelorus.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentlemen, I save wads of space in my user_prefs with
header J_YAHOO_CAL X-Yahoo-Newman-Property=~/calendar-invite/
score J_YAHOO_CAL 11
header J_MEDIAWIKI_MAILER X-Mailer=~/MediaWiki mailer/
score J_MEDIAWIKI_MAILER -10
instead of the traditional
header J_YAHOO_CAL
Oh no oh no, man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf says
Whitespace in the files is not significant, but please note that
starting a line with whitespace is deprecated, as we reserve its use
for multi-line rule definitions, at some point in the future.
OK, sorry. I regret my previous message.
Wait.
Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
maybe
header _CTYPE_PLAIN Content-Type =~ m|text/plain|
header _CTRANSFER_B64 Content-Transfer-Encoding =~ m|base64|
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh no oh no, man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf says
Whitespace in the files is not significant, but please note that
starting a line with whitespace is deprecated, as we reserve its use
for multi-line rule definitions, at some point in the future.
OK, sorry. I regret my
Hi, yep, i'm sorry about the 3 posts, wasn't because an edit, but because the
nabble site which went timeout :(
btw, i tried your solution and it works, thanks :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-integrate-spamassassin-in-a-web-app--tp19542249p19552374.html
Sent
mouss wrote:
not007 wrote:
I am using cpanel 11 and being told that I can't get spamassassin
to rewrite the subject of emails that are spam. Spam assassin IS
adding info in the header like:
X-Spam-Subject: [SPAM] test message
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1002.4
X-Spam-Score: 10024
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh no oh no, man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf says
Whitespace in the files is not significant, but please note that
starting a line with whitespace is deprecated, as we reserve its use
for multi-line rule definitions, at some point in the future.
OK, sorry. I regret my
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
(1) train your bayes with it
(2) try the sought fraud ruleset that Justin is generating
header tests were not available in Outlook
Express
That's what I am seeing also that seems like a big deal - cpanel is used
in lots of web hosting and spam assassin is needed these days. Not
everyone uses outlook and OE is a free app that comes with windows (yeah, I
guess you get what you
a rule based on the header text is doable in outlook, but not outlook
express.
mouss-2 wrote:
not007 wrote:
I am using cpanel 11 and being told that I can't get spamassassin to
rewrite
the subject of emails that are spam. Spam assassin IS adding info in the
header like:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 06:36 -0700, not007 wrote:
But this WAS usable with OE before. Taking away a critical feature for the
sake of new and improved is hard to push on clients, right?
See .sig
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:19 18-09-2008, Bowie Bailey wrote:
This works on Outlook, but header tests were not available in Outlook
Express the last time I checked.
In Outlook Express, you can have a rule for the Subject line.
Regards,
-sm
On Thu, September 18, 2008 8:55 am, mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
maybe
header _CTYPE_PLAIN Content-Type =~ m|text/plain| header _CTRANSFER_B64
Content-Transfer-Encoding =~ m|base64|
I wonder if
On Thu, September 18, 2008 9:33 am, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
(1) train your bayes with it
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at that.
Skip Morrow wrote:
On Thu, September 18, 2008 9:33 am, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
(1) train your bayes with it
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
that.
Doesn't look to me like you are using bayes. There is no bayes score in
the headers.
Oh. I thought I was. I do get reports in some messages. Here's the
debug from this particular message:
[12541] dbg: config: read
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
that.
Doesn't look to me like you are using bayes. There is no bayes score in
the headers.
Oh. I thought I was. I do get reports in some messages. Here's the
debug from this particular message:
[12541] dbg: config: read
Sorry about the double post--operator error.
header tests were not available in Outlook
Express
This might be the wrong question in the wrong place yet in this day and age,
why in the world is anyone using outlook express?
Stop do it!
;-
There are many other good choices.
- rh
Hello list,
first I'm wondering why I got the following error, because in my local.cf I
set 'bayes_auto_expire 1' to prevent SpamAssassin from expire the bayes-db (or
did amavis the expire?):
Sep 18 13:15:48 server amavis[19655]: (19655-04) (!)SA TIMED OUT, backtrace:
at
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip Morrow wrote:
Doesn't look to me like you are using bayes. There is no bayes score in
the headers.
Oh. I thought I was. I do get reports in some messages. Here's the
debug from this particular message:
[12541] dbg: config: read file
Silly question, but is peloruso the user that spamd is running as?
user/database mismatch is a common problem.
I'm not using spamd, I call spamassassin from procmail. I'm on a shared
host that doesn't allow users to run their own daemons (although they are
running their own spamd, but not
Skip Morrow wrote:
On Thu, September 18, 2008 8:55 am, mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
maybe
header _CTYPE_PLAIN Content-Type =~ m|text/plain| header _CTRANSFER_B64
Content-Transfer-Encoding =~
Skip Morrow wrote:
On Thu, September 18, 2008 9:33 am, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip wrote:
What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
(1) train your bayes with it
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite
Skip Morrow wrote:
Sorry about the double post--operator error.
fire operator :)
Hello list,
first I'm wondering why I got the following error, because in my local.cf I
set 'bayes_auto_expire 1' to prevent SpamAssassin from expire the bayes-db (or
did amavis the expire?):
Ah?
Bayes will auto expire if you set it for 'true' (1). Amavis doesn't do
anything, with
Is it possible to forward spam sent to me to an other user eg spam and run
sa-learn on that mailbox? I will then be sender.
--
Regards
Lars Ebeling
http://leopg9.no-ip.org
Hobbithobbyist
I am not young enough to know everything.
-- Oscar Wilde
RobertH wrote:
header tests were not available in Outlook
Express
This might be the wrong question in the wrong place yet in this day
and age, why in the world is anyone using outlook express?
Because it comes installed with every Windows computer. Quite a few
(most?) people will
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
that.
h...
Content analysis details: (6.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description --
--
3.5 BAYES_99
Configuration (maybe more than you care to see, sorry)
--
1) platform: kubuntu 8.04
2) SA version:3.2.4
3) options:
add_header spam BB score=_SCORE_
report_safe 0
lock_method flock
4) using qmail - procmail - spamc - spamd
ps ea | grep spam shows ...
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, mouss wrote:
(2) try the sought fraud ruleset that Justin is generating
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_sough
t_fraud.cf
I'm using that too, and again no joy there. It may be time for an
sa-update though.
sa-update and jm
Ok - that explains it - thank you very much. Really, many thanks !
But, is there a way to still not run BIND locally, and continue to
benefit from the RBL filters?
Perhaps there is a timeout associated with the RBL filters that can be
increased? I understand that if
such a timout option
Jules Yasuna wrote:
Configuration (maybe more than you care to see, sorry)
--
1) platform: kubuntu 8.04
2) SA version:3.2.4
3) options:
add_header spam BB score=_SCORE_
report_safe 0
lock_method flock
4) using qmail - procmail - spamc - spamd
ps ea | grep spam shows
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Lars Ebeling wrote:
Is it possible to forward spam sent to me to an other user eg spam and
run sa-learn on that mailbox? I will then be sender.
Possible, yes. Recommended, no, for the reason you note: forwarding alters
the message.
Probably the best way is to set up an
Skip Morrow wrote:
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
that.
h...
Content analysis details: (6.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description --
--
3.5 BAYES_99
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Jules Yasuna wrote:
[snip..]
SA has been working great! Very few spam messages get through. Then, we
made ONE change
to the machine. We turned off BIND, and just resolve to the ISP name
servers. After that, lots
and lots of spam gets through ? Not everything, just a lot
Jules Yasuna wrote:
Ok - that explains it - thank you very much. Really, many thanks !
But, is there a way to still not run BIND locally, and continue to
benefit from the RBL filters?
Take a look at djbdns. We run dnscache on all servers that require the
ability to do a DNS lookup and have
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, mouss wrote:
(2) try the sought fraud ruleset that Justin is generating
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_sough
t_fraud.cf
I'm using that too, and again no joy there. It may be time for an
sa-update
Bob Proulx wrote:
Nabble! Bad Nabble! Let me be yet another voice complaining about
how terrible Nabble is for mailing lists. AFAIK Nabble allows the
user to modify sent messages. Every time they modify the message it
sends the message again using the same Message-Id: as before. Grr...
Nabble
sought != sought_fraud.
Whoops! Thanks! Got it now, but still no hits in that rule set either.
Jules Yasuna wrote:
Ok - that explains it - thank you very much. Really, many thanks !
But, is there a way to still not run BIND locally, and continue to
benefit from the RBL filters?
Perhaps there is a timeout associated with the RBL filters that can be
increased? I understand that if
such
anyway, if your SA only misses few spam, there's no need to try to improve
that with new rules.
Yeah, this is the first spam I've gotten in about a month or maybe two.
Still, I let it bug me too much. That, and it's slow at work today. I
guess I'll just let it go.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, mouss wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
sought != sought_fraud.
ah. missed that. just tried it, but I get the same results.
That's not *too* surprising. At the moment the corpus for it is
manually-collected fraud spams sent to me personally, and I don't
necessarily see all
xdmx wrote:
Hi, yep, i'm sorry about the 3 posts, wasn't because an edit, but because the
nabble site which went timeout :(
All the more reason to not use a web interface to a e-mail group.
btw, i tried your solution and it works, thanks :)
Who's solution? Who are you replying to?
Evan Platt wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Nabble! Bad Nabble! Let me be yet another voice complaining about
how terrible Nabble is for mailing lists. AFAIK Nabble allows the
user to modify sent messages. Every time they modify the message it
sends the message again using the same Message-Id: as
Hi all,
I have a new install of MailScanner / Postfix / Spamassassin
when I run sudo -u postfix spamassassin -p
/etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -t message.MAI
I get the following error:
warn config path /root/ .spamassassin is inaccessible permission denied
How can I resolve this
Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
Hi all,
I have a new install of MailScanner / Postfix / Spamassassin
when I run sudo -u postfix spamassassin -p
/etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -t message.MAI
I get the following error:
warn config path /root/ .spamassassin is inaccessible permission denied
I don't think I want to run it as root do I? (MailScanner is set to use
user postfix)
Which config file sets it to use /root/ directory?
Thanks
Kate
mouss wrote:
Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
Hi all,
I have a new install of MailScanner / Postfix / Spamassassin
when I run sudo -u postfix
Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
I don't think I want to run it as root do I?
run the test command as root, not mailscanner. you have the error while
running the test command. you don't have an error while running
mailscanner.
(MailScanner is set to use user postfix)
I Don't use MS so I have no
I am almost 100% certain that I need to be able to run this command as
postfix.
Kate
mouss wrote:
Kate Kleinschafer wrote:
I don't think I want to run it as root do I?
run the test command as root, not mailscanner. you have the error
while running the test command. you don't have an error
FreeBSD 6.2
re2c-0.13.5
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/usr/local/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
-pipe-DVERSION=\1.0\ -DXS_VERSION=\1.0\ -DPIC -fPIC
-I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE body_0.c
cc -c
mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and if you don't want bind, try one of the available alternatives. but a
local DNS is recommended on a mail server or spam filter that uses DNS.
Regarding alternatives, we use djbdns here; highly recommended.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
54 matches
Mail list logo
