Steven,
Jul 6 22:38:08 saturn spamd[32217]: Argument 2.long isn't \
numeric in numeric lt () at \
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
1004.
Should I be concerned?
595 spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.10.0
Hi,
I can't imagine that this should not be possible, but couldn't find anything
about this question in the spamassassin docs or elsewhere on the net. I need
a rule that has several single tests that all should return true for the whole
rule to match - something like e.g.:
describe RULE
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 09:43 +0200, Peter Daum wrote:
Is there a simpler and better way to specify that all tests in a rule
have to match? (or, just for symmetry, to say that a test should
not match)?
describe RULE Combined tests
header__R1 From=~/something/
header__R2
hello :)
as described in
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/137360
they re-build a rule that ZMIde_HIDDENURL1 could allready match.
__ZMIde_HIDDENURL1 match. but __ZMIde_HIDDENURL2 has to be modified to
detect an url with dot at the end. as non-programmer i remove
Martin Gregorie wrote:
You need double underscores to make a rule invisible.
... oops - I had overlooked on the web page, that this is _2_ underscores
(and was pretty puzzled to discover that w/o assigning a separate score
to each single test they will be ignored ;) - Thanks a lot!
Just for
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:33:12 +0200
Peter Daum gator...@yahoo.de wrote:
- whereas hidden tests are only useful for meta rules (when I
prepend __ to the name of some other rule, it is not only hidden,
but also ends up with a score of 0, even if there is some other score
explicitly assigned)
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:33 +0200, Peter Daum wrote:
Just for clarification:
- I guess, your answer implies that the only way to write a rule where each
of several tests must match is via such a meta rule? (i.e. there is no
way to write a regular rule with multiple tests that must all
Freelotto.com went on our local blocklist on October 31, 2001. No one
here has ever asked us about not getting mail from that domain.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Now that I have a SA Daily Summary report for the rule hits, now I'm
looking for a command(s) to run that will show me the end score that
will be applied to a successful hit after reading all cf files and
user_prefs files. For example:
/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf may contain: score
Hello,
Following my recent queries on this list, for which I am still grateful,
I abandoned my ambitions for installing and running SA on Windows XP,
and decided to take on web hosting which offers SA. (I have re-uploaded
an old web site essentially for the purpose of getting hosting which
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, can someone explain or send me a link to a *full* explanation of
the 4 different scores (local, net, with bayes, with bayes+net)?
It's fairly simple. Here is the description from the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
If four valid scores are
Forgot reply all.
Ok, when all I have is 1 score, is that used for all four scenarios?
Dan Schaefer
Application Developer
Performance Administration Corp.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, can someone explain or send me a link to a *full* explanation
of the 4 different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/09 03:05, quoth Mark Martinec:
Steven,
Jul 6 22:38:08 saturn spamd[32217]: Argument 2.long isn't \
numeric in numeric lt () at \
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
1004.
Should I be
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:13:17 -0400
Rosenbaum, Larry M. rosenbau...@ornl.gov wrote:
Has anybody considered revising the Bayes expiration logic? Maybe
it's just our data that's weird, but the built-in expiration logic
doesn't seem to work very well for us. Here are my observations:
There's
Yep.
The previous paragraph from the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
If only one valid score is listed, then that score is always
used for a test.
RTFMP - Read The Fine Man Page :)
--
Bowie
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
Ok, when all I have is 1 score, is that
On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
--
xpoint
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:05:53 +0100
Lee uk...@btinternet.com wrote:
Hello,
Following my recent queries on this list, for which I am still
grateful, I abandoned my ambitions for installing and running SA on
Windows XP, and decided to take on web hosting which offers SA. (I
have re-uploaded
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
should be expected. I am not really buying into
Quoting davidcass dav...@cassisdesign.com:
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
At 10:45 AM 7/7/2009, you wrote:
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
What is 1?
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
I ALWAYS hit that button, and then cut'n'paste the list address from
Cc:line to the To: line.
Reply button replies only to the sending individual.
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log files:
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] no working DCC
serversdcc1.dcc-servers.net dcc2.dcc-servers.net dcc3.dcc-servers.net ... at
64.124.52.232 208.201.249.2
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log files:
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] no working DCC
serversdcc1.dcc-servers.net dcc2.dcc-servers.net dcc3.dcc-servers.net ... at
64.124.52.232 208.201.249.2
Jul 7 13:22:48
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
What the.? So am I!
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701 /^Assets of my deceased
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701 /^Assets of my deceased Client/
body LOC_09070702 /^Assets of my deceased Client/m
body LOC_09070703 /^Assets of my deceased Client/ms
And NONE of them match the beginning of line!
I also just switched web hosts and went with Dream Host, primarily because
they do allow you to run your own compiled SA installation (you can of
course use theirs if you wish), including bayes, should you chose. You will
have to use one of their Private Servers, which does cost a little more,
On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
I ALWAYS hit that button, and then cut'n'paste the list address from
Cc:line to the To: line.
this is bad design in
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2004.0 required=10.0 autolearn=disabled
tests=LOC_SAUSERS_RCVD_WL=-1000,LOC_SAUSERS_TO_WL=-1000,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Reply button replies only to the sending individual.
should be okay
thunderbird can have a plugin to fix this problem ?
The plugin is called Reply to mailing list. It adds a Reply list
button that works
I just installed that and it works nicely. However, we're getting off
track a little... My second question was answered with RTFMP, but my
first question about a script that will show me the ending score after
all config files have been read, has not been answered. If anyone knows
of any kind
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
What the.? So am I!
I have tried all combinations of:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
Just for interest sake, I am putting my 'test line' here
Assets of my deceased Client
...just to see if it is my testing method that is broken
The body rule is comparing against a cleaned up paragraph where those
lines are joined. Otherwise
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, again off the subject...is it common practice in this user list to
reply at the bottom of emails, or can I continue to reply at the top?
Common practice on any technical mailing list is to prune the reply to the
relevant bits and insert your
On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
I ALWAYS hit that button, and then cut'n'paste the list address from
Cc:line to the To: line.
this is bad design in
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:57:59 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
What the.? So am
Hi! Netfriends,
I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5 on my academic RHEL server and it works
well :-)
I'm also using Net::DNS version: 0.65, amavisd-new 2.6.4, postfix 2.5.6
I'm receiving an email which take too much time to process.
I have to remove it from my postfix's mail queue
here is part
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
I just installed that and it works nicely. However, we're getting off
track a little... My second question was answered with RTFMP, but my
first question about a script that will show me the ending score after
all config files have been read, has not been answered. If
On Tue, July 7, 2009 21:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Where did you get that Thunderbird thing? If you look at the headers you
see that my message-id is quite similar to yours, containing squirrel.
enable listcommands plugin
i just belived i was alone using squirrelmail :)
--
xpoint
Eddy,
I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5 on my academic RHEL server and it works
well :-)
I'm also using Net::DNS version: 0.65, amavisd-new 2.6.4, postfix 2.5.6
I'm receiving an email which take too much time to process.
I have to remove it from my postfix's mail queue
here is part of the
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Mark Martinec wrote:
It is not the DNS query that is a problem here.
Eddy:
What happens when you run the test using -L (no network tests)? Does it
still take as long?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
Thanks. It was a firewall issue.
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:54 PM
To: Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DCC problems
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log
On Tue, July 7, 2009 23:15, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Thanks. It was a firewall issue.
with now turns into a html issue on maillist :)
--
xpoint
Thanks very much for the various replies on this, both on and off list.
I'm very grateful and am considering things.
Lee
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701 /^Assets of my deceased Client/
body LOC_09070702 /^Assets of my deceased Client/m
body LOC_09070703 /^Assets of my deceased Client/ms
44 matches
Mail list logo
