Well, here's my $0.02
For starters, is it realistic to think that someone charged with
implementing spamassassin on a mailserver does not know what spam is?
The first 2 sections are fluff and would be best replaced by a link to
wikipedia's spam entry, along with the warning if you need to
On 2011/11/28 19:21, Jason Haar wrote:
Don't have an answer for you, but I can say that the following URL works
under FF-8.0
http://0x12.0x12.0x12.0x12/
(resolves to 18.18.18.18)
However, if you force browsers through a squid proxy, squid-2.6 at least
treats that as borked and won't play with
On 2011/11/28 20:28, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 18:35 -0800, jdow wrote:
It is a way of obfuscating that's over the top and nobody has a way to
get those oddball formulations easily from standard tools. They become
an excellent way of
A note for those unfamiliar with GCI that these are 13 to 17 year old kids
getting an introduction to open source. Thanks for the feedback!
Regards,
KAM
Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
Well, here's my $0.02
For starters, is it realistic to think that someone charged with
implementing
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 20:17 -0800, Dave Warren wrote:
On 11/28/2011 7:37 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
I tried feeding 000192.000168.0007.0002 to Lynx and Opera as the sole
command line argument:
Wouldn't that be 000300.000250.0007.0002 ? Or did I miss a step here?
I was assuming that the
Ah, that would make a difference. Carry on!
Ted
On 11/29/2011 3:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
A note for those unfamiliar with GCI that these are 13 to 17 year old
kids getting an introduction to open source. Thanks for the feedback!
Regards,
KAM
Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
For you Freebsd users of SpamAssassin. I have posted an update to
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin:
Major change includes the back porting of the updated DCC.pm module from
SA 3.4.0
This update beings increased performance and reliability, as well as
supporting both the commercial(private) and
On 11/28/2011 11:21 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 11/28/2011 7:41 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:21:56 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
http://0x12.0x12.0x12.0x12/
does not work in chrome
I tried in Chrome 16.0.912.41 beta-m and 17.0.953.0 canary, both
instantly changed the displayed
On 29/11/11 15:21, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 11/28/2011 11:21 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 11/28/2011 7:41 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:21:56 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
http://0x12.0x12.0x12.0x12/
does not work in chrome
I tried in Chrome 16.0.912.41 beta-m and 17.0.953.0
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:37:57 +0100, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
http://0xAD.0xC2.0x21.0x34/
Firefox treats it as :
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
/0xad.0xc2.0x21.0x34/
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
Works for me in Firefox 8.
On 11/28/2011 2:25 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 28.11.2011 20:17, schrieb Daniel McDonald:
On 11/28/11 12:55 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com dar...@chaosreigns.com
wrote:
If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please
open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data
On 11/28/2011 1:55 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please
open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data is not freely available,
it would be useful to list on the spamassassin wiki.
Darxus,
I'd love to have the
On 11/29/2011 1:34 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:55 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please
open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data is not freely available,
it would be useful to list on the spamassassin
Summary for the impatient:
Do not write rules like this.
Instead, train Bayes, make sure you're using DNSBLs.
On 11/25/2011 09:49 AM, Sergio wrote:
I wrote all the HELO spammers that SA didn't caught
...
header CHARLY_RULE1ALL =~ /(...)/i
describe CHARLY_RULE1Charly Spammers
score
On 11/25/2011 10:13 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Subject: [Fwd: Re: How long a rule can be?]
My main answers to the original thread were posted there (today). I
guess I'm too accustomed to orderly threads; coupling my threaded view
in thunderbird with the big pile of mail unread since before the
On 11/29/2011 9:17 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:37:57 +0100, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
http://0xAD.0xC2.0x21.0x34/
Firefox treats it as :
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
/0xad.0xc2.0x21.0x34/
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
Works
On 11/29/2011 10:48 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
You are likely correct you were told that. However, speaking on
behalf of the project, the mess of differing licenses and limits for
RBLs and related projects has been very difficult to define a one-size
fits all answer to the question of
KAM did that in the first reply.
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Dorian Chan articgrayling...@gmail.com:
Sorry, I don't really think the nabble attachment option really worked,
so
I'll actually attach it. Sorry for that!
It worked both times, but the document is almost unreadable because
On 2011/11/29 06:37, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
On 29/11/11 15:21, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 11/28/2011 11:21 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 11/28/2011 7:41 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:21:56 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
http://0x12.0x12.0x12.0x12/
does not work in chrome
I tried in
Hi all,
I have two fedora15 boxes that process mail for a few domains, and
recently set up bayes in mysql for each of them. The servers are in
geographically different locations, a few hops from each other. Since
they both process mail for the same domains, I thought it made sense
to share the
symantec doesn't use spamassassin and does not use the name mailscanner.
mailscanner is an open source program. It uses spamassassin to scan
mail.
I would also suggest that at the top of the document that you put in
something along the lines of this document is intended to be read by
[insert
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Dorian Chan wrote:
Hello again,
I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without all
the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and some
cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedback!
Everywhere you say
On 11/30/2011 1:58 AM, Michael Parker wrote:
Everywhere you say SpamAssassin you should probably be saying Apache
SpamAssassin.
Michael
PS Kevin, this also applies to the listing on the Google Code-In site, is that
something that can be fixed?
Good call. Editing the GCI site would be
On 11/29/2011 10:58 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Dorian Chan wrote:
Hello again,
I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without all
the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and some
cleaning up. Again, I would
24 matches
Mail list logo
