On 11/28/2011 2:25 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 28.11.2011 20:17, schrieb Daniel McDonald: >> On 11/28/11 12:55 PM, "dar...@chaosreigns.com" <dar...@chaosreigns.com> >> wrote: >>> If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please >>> open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data is not freely available, >>> it would be useful to list on the spamassassin wiki. >> The best RBLS for getting rid of snow-shoe spammers are from Invaluement, >> but it is available by subscription only. > the best rbl is the one you dont need, a case which is very rare these > days *g
I guess I must be dumb because Robert Schetterer's last sentence above makes absolutely no sense to me. Instead, imo, the RBLs that you *do* need are the ones with (1) extreme few FPs and (2) which block spams that your other currently implemented RBLs are missing (particularly compared to those other RBLs w/extreme low FPs since RBLs with moderate-to-high FPs are either worthless, or can't be depended upon except for very low scoring... and that makes their unique "hits" not nearly as valuable as such hits are on a dependable low FP list). -- Rob McEwen http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ r...@invaluement.com +1 (478) 475-9032
