On 08/10/2014 04:30 PM, Andy wrote:
Hello it's the toymaker with the spam problem again.
I am just wondering if I could get a second opinion on a response I just
received from Lunarpages tech support (albeit the first level, and
probably a canned response). It would be helpful to present
I've copied a few of your responses (without including any names) and sent
them to support at lunarpages. And maybe it's due to that that after six+
months of battling with them, I now get this from their support.
The user_prefs file exists under your account, in
/home/-/.spamassassin; you
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 05:34:34 -0700
Andy wrote:
I've copied a few of your responses (without including any names) and
sent them to support at lunarpages. And maybe it's due to that that
after six+ months of battling with them, I now get this from their
support.
The user_prefs file exists
Keep replies on list.
Do you remember making any changes, or are you using spamassassin as it
comes? What kind of email is going through your server? Very large
emails can cause trouble with poorly written rules. If you can, perhaps
systematically turn off things that are pushing email to
ok so if i understand things
the only way that is feasible for any person/business to be using Spam
Assassin is to either have an IT department, hire out, or expect that
their ISP host is doing the work.
do i have that right?
On Mon, August 11, 2014 6:05 am, RW wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Andy wrote:
ok so if i understand things
the only way that is feasible for any person/business to be using Spam
Assassin is to either have an IT department, hire out, or expect that
their ISP host is doing the work.
do i have that right?
There are alternatives which
On 08/11/2014 03:23 PM, Andy wrote:
ok so if i understand things
the only way that is feasible for any person/business to be using Spam
Assassin is to either have an IT department, hire out, or expect that
their ISP host is doing the work.
do i have that right?
Yes, you have it right...
You
OK, but since early on in this discussion there was question whether I had
adminstrative access. I just thought that SA being common source like it
is, there are also shareable files with whatever the latest tweaks or
scripts or whatever the .spamassassin file is.
If I'm sounding like a leech,
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:45:24 -0700
Andy a...@opticaltoys.com wrote:
If I'm sounding like a leech, that's because in this case I would very
much like to be. :o)
I have fired paying customers for behaving like you. It's even worse
to abuse a community of free software users and authors.
Paid
On 08/11/2014 03:45 PM, Andy wrote:
OK, but since early on in this discussion there was question whether I had
adminstrative access. I just thought that SA being common source like it
is, there are also shareable files with whatever the latest tweaks or
scripts or whatever the .spamassassin file
Sheesh. Sorry to offend. As far as it goes, I'm a leech for using Spam
Assassin right now as it is.
Ok I can see my welcome is over here. I'm outta here. Thanks everyone (else).
On Mon, August 11, 2014 7:00 am, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:45:24 -0700
Andy a...@opticaltoys.com
--As of August 11, 2014 10:00:34 AM -0400, David F. Skoll is alleged to
have said:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:45:24 -0700
Andy a...@opticaltoys.com wrote:
If I'm sounding like a leech, that's because in this case I would very
much like to be. :o)
I have fired paying customers for behaving
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:45:24 -0700
Andy wrote:
OK, but since early on in this discussion there was question whether
I had adminstrative access. I just thought that SA being common
source like it is, there are also shareable files with whatever the
latest tweaks or scripts or whatever the
Hi all.
This may be a very stupid question but I would like to ask you all
anyway.
I am planning to install SA on our SMTP MTAs, which deals only with
outgoing traffic generated in the internal network.
I am making the assumption that our clients are mostly sending 'clean'
email (I know, I am
On 8/11/2014 10:38 AM, Matteo Dessalvi wrote:
Hi all.
This may be a very stupid question but I would like to ask you all
anyway.
I am planning to install SA on our SMTP MTAs, which deals only with
outgoing traffic generated in the internal network.
I am making the assumption that our clients
On 08/11/2014 09:06 AM, Andy wrote:
Sheesh. Sorry to offend. As far as it goes, I'm a leech for using Spam
Assassin right now as it is.
I'd be inclined to just make sure that Thunderbird's (your headers
indicate you are using Thunderbird) adaptive filtering is turned on
(which I don't think
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
What do other people do? Or are we just going to end up with an
Internet in about 10 years where every single email box is either
on Microsoft 365 or Gmail and the NSA has a wonderful interface to
use to hunt through
Hi,
Hopefully you'll consider this a related question, as I would really
appreciate your input. We periodically have users that complain about
receiving email they believe to be spam, but it looks to be legitimate. One
current case was an email received from Computer Associates. It passed
through
Am 11.08.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Alex:
We periodically have users that complain about receiving email they
believe to be spam
you will never goal an universal opinion about what is ham/spam on
shared systems
if not tagged auto ( or by the admin after human watch etc ), users
may blacklist it by
On Monday 11 August 2014 at 21:02:38 (EU time), Alex wrote:
We periodically have users that complain about receiving email they believe
to be spam, but it looks to be legitimate.
What's your definition of legitimate :) ?
My definition of spam is email which is:
- unsolicited (ie: the user
On 08/11/2014 02:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Hopefully you'll consider this a related question, as I would really
appreciate your input. We periodically have users that complain about
receiving email they believe to be spam, but it looks to be legitimate.
I'm still pretty much a newbie after only 3
Hello all,
I've recently installed Spamassassin (v3.3.1) + Amavis on a SMTP MTA server
which is only used for outgoing email. I had to install SA to deal with
compromised accounts that are used to send spam. It works pretty good for
now however spam with only 1 URL in the body and few text are
11.08.2014, 22:48, Karl Johnson kirjoitti:
Hello all,
I've recently installed Spamassassin (v3.3.1) + Amavis on a SMTP MTA
server which is only used for outgoing email. I had to install SA to
deal with compromised accounts that are used to send spam. It works
pretty good for now however spam
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 16:38 +0200, Matteo Dessalvi wrote:
I am planning to install SA on our SMTP MTAs, which deals only with
outgoing traffic generated in the internal network.
Outgoing traffic. That means, most DNSBLs are either completely useless
or effectively disabled. You'll also need to
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:48 -0400, Karl Johnson wrote:
Is there any rule to score an email with only 1 URL and very few text?
It could trigger only text formatted email because they usually aren't
in HTML.
Identify very short (raw)bodies.
rawbody __RB_GT_200 /^.{201}/s
meta
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 22:57 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
* 1.8 DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD No valid author signature, domain signs all mail
* and suggests discarding the rest
This is a corner case. I got it tagged, but probably just because I
tested it later and URIBL has it now.
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 09:18 -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
Keep replies on list.
Do you remember making any changes, or are you using spamassassin as it
comes? What kind of email is going through your server? Very large
emails can cause trouble with poorly written rules. If you can, perhaps
27 matches
Mail list logo
