Hi, Hopefully you'll consider this a related question, as I would really appreciate your input. We periodically have users that complain about receiving email they believe to be spam, but it looks to be legitimate. One current case was an email received from Computer Associates. It passed through CA's servers. There's a pastebin for it below.
Another was one of those mass-mailing training seminar bulk messages. If the test rules had any real score, it probably would have been tagged: T_AXB_XM_SENTBY=0.01, T_FSL_ABUSED_WEB_1=0.01, T_FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_2=0.01, T_FSL_UNSUB_RATWARE=0.01, T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.01, T_NOT_A_PERSON=-0.01 The domain is legit and it looks to be a real company. Are these the types of messages where the business purchases a list from a bulk mailing company? Do you consider marketing emails such as these to be spam, and should they be marked? The user also submitted a message with about 400 recipients and a completely blank body. This was probably a broken attempt by a spammer to send something, but it should have been caught. Should there be a meta to catch that? # CA email http://pastebin.com/5H5wwfHb # training email http://pastebin.com/B9Mfqjgr Any ideas greatly appreciated. Thanks, Alex
