Am 17.02.2015 um 23:37 schrieb LuKreme:
On 17 Feb 2015, at 08:27 , Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
you dont train spamass-milter, you should train
On 02/17/2015 11:16 PM, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 16:10 GMT-06:00 Axb axb.li...@gmail.com:
_
also prevented by my suggestion of header_checks BCC with Postfix 3.0
Note 1: the BCC address is added as if it was
Am 17.02.2015 um 23:37 schrieb LuKreme:
On 17 Feb 2015, at 08:27 , Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
you dont train spamass-milter, you should train
On 17 Feb 2015, at 15:46 , Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
because in a default milter-setup the one and only user is the user which SA
and the miler service are running as, hence my script which needs maybe small
adjustments for your environment (--no-sync and so on depend on the
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
--
What beep from yonder speaker sounds?
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
cat /var/lib/spamass-milter/training/learn.sh
#!/usr/bin/bash
# Home-Directory und Name des Milter-Users
SA_MILTER_HOME=/var/lib/spamass-milter
2015-02-17 10:52 GMT-06:00 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com:
That variable comes from
$Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::RegistrarBoundaries::VALID_TLDS_RE;
Hi Kevin, good to hear around here,
Sounds like you might have some mish-mash of SpamAssassin versions and
plugins.
well , update to
Hi, I have been updating some dependencies CPAN, but spamassassin
shows that warn:
spamassassin --lint
[18198] warn: Use of uninitialized value $tlds in regexp compilation
at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/FreeMail.pm
line 121.
someone on the list could explain this warn?
On 2/17/2015 11:42 AM, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Hi, I have been updating some dependencies CPAN, but spamassassin
shows that warn:
spamassassin --lint
[18198] warn: Use of uninitialized value $tlds in regexp compilation
at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/FreeMail.pm
line
On 17.02.15 08:13, LuKreme wrote:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
if you use -u parameter (maybe with -x), you should train it as the user
who receives the mail
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
Am 17.02.2015 um 15:19 schrieb LuKreme:
On 16 Feb 2015, at 12:01 , Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
given that 24266 messages had BAYES_00 with a total number of 30401 delivered
mails in the current month that training strategy seems to work well
[root@mail-gw:~]$ bayes-stats.sh
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
you dont train spamass-milter, you should train spamassassin
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
Best Regards
MfG Robert
On 16 Feb 2015, at 12:01 , Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
given that 24266 messages had BAYES_00 with a total number of 30401 delivered
mails in the current month that training strategy seems to work well
[root@mail-gw:~]$ bayes-stats.sh
What is bayes-stats.sh?
--
I have a
Hi,
Feb 15 18:44:41.383 [16434] dbg: spf: [...] Compilation failed in
require at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SPF.pm
line 500.
Looks to me like the same issue (but a different symptom) as reported
my mls mid January 2015 on the SA users mailing list:
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
--
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks and *not* smtp_header_checks, hence it
ok I'll be test with their advice, I will be in touch with you
regardss
2015-02-17 14:16 GMT-06:00 Antony Stone
antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it:
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount
Am 17.02.2015 um 21:05 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks and *not* smtp_header_checks, hence it need to be
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:25 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
while my other answer solves the how to
Am 17.02.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Antony Stone:
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.nethttp://www.fluxlabs.net/ | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501tel:850-250-5590;501 | Cell :
850-890-2543tel:850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955tel:850-254-2955
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:05 PM, ricky
On 2/17/2015 12:21 PM, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 10:52 GMT-06:00 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com:
That variable comes from
$Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::RegistrarBoundaries::VALID_TLDS_RE;
Hi Kevin, good to hear around here,
Sounds like you might have some mish-mash of SpamAssassin
Hi , I have mounted one gateway filtering me all spam in the business,
I have to postfix + centos6.6 + amavisd-new 2.8 + clamav +
spamassassin, currently captures 65% of spam the other 35 gets
through, I want to improve the effectiveness making a Bayesian db.
I am not an expert in postfix and
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/17/2015 12:21 PM, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 10:52 GMT-06:00 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com:
That variable comes from
$Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::RegistrarBoundaries::VALID_TLDS_RE;
Hi Kevin, good to hear around here,
Sounds
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Jeremy McSpadden:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
that was not the question
the question was how to get spam/ham-samples for train bayes after all
other filters and RBL's are running in a sane setup long before
contentfilters
see me response to that
2015-02-17 11:49 GMT-06:00 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com:
That sounds like an RPM. Missing RPMs and CPAN may lead to issues. What did
you update from CPAN? What distribution, etc. are you using?
CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
add a list cpan modules.
--
rickygm
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:03 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
Hi , I have mounted one gateway filtering me all spam in the business,
I have to postfix + centos6.6 + amavisd-new 2.8 + clamav +
spamassassin, currently captures 65% of spam the other 35 gets
through, I want to improve the effectiveness making a
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks and *not* smtp_header_checks, hence it need to be
defined on the downstream server instead on the
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific account.
I was looking for how to handle this with postfix
2015-02-17 13:14 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:38 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific account.
I was looking for how to handle this with postfix
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org ? it
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific account.
I was looking for how to handle this with
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Axb:
On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client
On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific
On 02/17/2015 10:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Axb:
On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through
2015-02-17 16:10 GMT-06:00 Axb axb.li...@gmail.com:
_
also prevented by my suggestion of header_checks BCC with Postfix 3.0
Note 1: the BCC address is added as if it was specified with
NOTIFY=NONE. The sender will not
On 17 Feb 2015, at 08:27 , Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
you dont train spamass-milter, you should train spamassassin
spamassassin has existing
Am 17.02.2015 um 00:54 schrieb ttgh:
@Antony, I particularly appreciated your response (and the spelling of your
name). To clarify: I am not saying that all messages to ALL ex-staff are
spam, only the messages to specific ex-staff. Also, this email server is
acting as relay/filter for an
40 matches
Mail list logo
