Am 09.11.2015 um 20:18 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-11-09 19:16:
spamassassin is usually only *one part *of a whole spamfiltering
solution and in most serious setups there is a threshold where high
scored junk is *not* delivered to any spam-folder
i dont care of your
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-11-09 19:16:
spamassassin is usually only *one part *of a whole spamfiltering
solution and in most serious setups there is a threshold where high
scored junk is *not* delivered to any spam-folder
i dont care of your glues
dspam is dead
so you say so, that makes
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:27:22 +
RW wrote:
> > > and which user does spamassassin run as on your system?
> >
> > root - which I'm slightly surprised at.
>
> You're probably looking at the main process, rather than child
> processes that scan the mail.
>
> When you look at the output of ps,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:12:20 -0800
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 16:42 +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> > What did Jessie install it as?
> >
> > > > /var/mail/.spamassassin/user_prefs
>
> This is very strange. Are you really sure it is not operator error?
>
> I run wheezy, so I can't fla
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:42:43 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2015 at 16:23:52, Phil Reynolds wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:11:16 +0100 Antony Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > What are the ownership & permissions on:
> > >
> > > /var/mail/,spamassassin
> >
> > Tried root.root and
Am 09.11.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Amir Caspi skrev den 2015-11-09 18:32:
A score of 6 is a poison pill for a threshold of 5 unless there are
significant negative-score rules that hit.
spamassassin never reject so there is no point there
blabla
spamassassin is usually only *o
On 11/09/2015 06:09 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Folks:
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Malicious+spam+with+links+to+CryptoWall+3.0+-+Subject%3A+Domain+%5Bname%5D+Suspension+Notice/20333
This may not do well enough in masscheck to get published, so it's
probably a good idea to just put it in your local r
Thanks John,
Installed on my test system:
- score incremented by 1 (I use +6 in place of +5)
- noddy test mail created
- rule working as expected
- exported to my live system
Many thanks,
Martin
Amir Caspi skrev den 2015-11-09 18:32:
A score of 6 is a poison pill for a threshold of 5 unless there are
significant negative-score rules that hit.
spamassassin never reject so there is no point there
If an email is otherwise
"neutral" (Bayes 50, no whitelist, no DNSWL, etc) this easily bi
On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> and it was the only rule that hitted ?
>
> think again
A score of 6 is a poison pill for a threshold of 5 unless there are significant
negative-score rules that hit. If an email is otherwise "neutral" (Bayes 50, no
whitelist, no DNSWL, et
On 11/9/2015 12:15 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:09 AM, John Hardin wrote:
score URI_MALWARE_CWALL6.000
Is your threshold higher than 5? Otherwise this is a poison pill for a
"potential" hit.
--- Amir
thumbed via iPhone
There's a lot of things that can bring
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:09 AM, John Hardin wrote:
score URI_MALWARE_CWALL6.000
Is your threshold higher than 5? Otherwise this is a poison pill for a
"potential" hit.
My Spam threshold is 5 and my Quarantine threshold is 10.
I'd sugge
Amir Caspi skrev den 2015-11-09 18:15:
On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:09 AM, John Hardin wrote:
score URI_MALWARE_CWALL6.000
Is your threshold higher than 5? Otherwise this is a poison pill for a
"potential" hit.
and it was the only rule that hitted ?
think again
On Nov 9, 2015, at 10:09 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> score URI_MALWARE_CWALL6.000
Is your threshold higher than 5? Otherwise this is a poison pill for a
"potential" hit.
--- Amir
thumbed via iPhone
Folks:
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Malicious+spam+with+links+to+CryptoWall+3.0+-+Subject%3A+Domain+%5Bname%5D+Suspension+Notice/20333
This may not do well enough in masscheck to get published, so it's
probably a good idea to just put it in your local ruleset:
uriURI_MALWARE_CWALL
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:23:52 +
Phil Reynolds wrote:
> > /var/mail/.spamassassin/user_prefs
spamd seems to be treating /var/mail/ as a home directory. I would have
expected .spamassassin to be in a directory owned by the spamd user.
> Not there at all.
>
> > and which user does spamassas
On 2015-11-09 16:42 +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> What did Jessie install it as?
>
> > > /var/mail/.spamassassin/user_prefs
This is very strange. Are you really sure it is not operator error?
I run wheezy, so I can't flat out exclude it, but it flies in the face
of too much Debian tradition. /v
On 09.11.15 13:23, Phil Reynolds wrote:
I have recently transferred all of my email system to a new machine,
but spamassassin is not yet fully functional.
It seems that it is trying to use /var/mail/.spamassassin as a data
directory - this is fine, but it does not appear to be correctly set up.
On Monday 09 November 2015 at 16:23:52, Phil Reynolds wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:11:16 +0100 Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > What are the ownership & permissions on:
> >
> > /var/mail/,spamassassin
>
> Tried root.root and debian-spamd.debian.spamd, 755.
What did Jessie install it as?
> > /var
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:11:16 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2015 at 14:23:04, Phil Reynolds wrote:
>
> > I have recently transferred all of my email system to a new machine,
> > but spamassassin is not yet fully functional.
> >
> > It seems that it is trying to use /var/mail/.
On Monday 09 November 2015 at 14:23:04, Phil Reynolds wrote:
> I have recently transferred all of my email system to a new machine,
> but spamassassin is not yet fully functional.
>
> It seems that it is trying to use /var/mail/.spamassassin as a data
> directory - this is fine, but it does not a
I have recently transferred all of my email system to a new machine,
but spamassassin is not yet fully functional.
It seems that it is trying to use /var/mail/.spamassassin as a data
directory - this is fine, but it does not appear to be correctly set up.
Errors like these are appearing in my sys
22 matches
Mail list logo
