On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:42:43 +0100
Antony Stone <antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it> wrote:

> On Monday 09 November 2015 at 16:23:52, Phil Reynolds wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:11:16 +0100 Antony Stone wrote:
> > > 
> > > What are the ownership & permissions on:
> > > 
> > > /var/mail/,spamassassin
> > 
> > Tried root.root and debian-spamd.debian.spamd, 755.
> 
> What did Jessie install it as?

Not at all.
 
> > > /var/mail/.spamassassin/user_prefs
> > 
> > Not there at all.
> 
> Have you tried creating it, to let spamd look in it?
> 
> > > and which user does spamassassin run as on your system?
> > 
> > root - which I'm slightly surprised at.
> 
> How did you identify this?

See below - it looks like I'm missing some information. All one package
but different bits of it.
 
> > > How is spamassassin being called in order to give its opinion on
> > > email?
> > 
> > exim is calling it. The results also appear in syslog.
> 
> 1. I seriously doubt that on a Debian system exim is running as root.
> 
> What do you see in the first column of output from "ps aux | grep
> exim"?

Debian-+ - likely really Debian-exim

> 2. It sounds like we're talking slightly at cross-purposes here.
> Exim may be calling spamassassin (PS: how?), but that's not spamd,
> providing a network service to other machines.

As for the "how?", I can't rightly say - but it's actually spamd that's
giving the opinion.

> What do you see in the first column of output from "ps aux | grep
> spamd"?

root
 
-- 
Phil Reynolds
mail: phil-spamassas...@tinsleyviaduct.com

Reply via email to