Not knowing the details of your environment...
Instead of taking on the job of filtering email for all of your clients (this,
to me, will open up a can of worms), why not set a policy that port 25 is
blocked by default and customers must request for it to be unblocked?
You can then build a li
- On May 11, 2017, at 8:04 AM, Anthony Hoppe aho...@sjcourts.org wrote:
> - On May 11, 2017, at 6:02 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 May 2017 12:19:37 +
>> David Jones wrote:
>>
>>> From: Anthony Hoppe
>>>
>
- On May 11, 2017, at 6:02 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017 12:19:37 +
> David Jones wrote:
>
>> From: Anthony Hoppe
>>
>> >Can I whitelist based on a combination of the Received header and
>> >domain in the Ret
- On May 11, 2017, at 5:14 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2017 21:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
> Anthony Hoppe wrote:
>
>
>> Here are headers from one of the messages:
>> https://pastebin.com/ijy9Z51y
>
>
> X-Spam-Status:
ssage -
From: "Alex"
To: "Anthony Hoppe" , "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 5:41:37 PM
Subject: Re: Negative rule score not working as expected
Hi,
> headerAH_KNOWBE4 Received=~ /phishtest\.knowbe4\.com/
> score AH_KNOWBE4 score -10.0
, 2017 5:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: Negative rule score not working as expected
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Anthony Hoppe skrev den 2017-05-11 00:55:
>> I'm trying to implement a very simple rule that looks at the
>> "Received" header(s) and if a string is
...and now it works as expected. Thank you all for listening. :-D
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Hoppe"
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:58:57 PM
Subject: Re: Negative rule score not working as expected
Oh my chuck, I am such an idiot. My
Oh my chuck, I am such an idiot. My score line is wrong. This would be more
appropriate:
score AH_KNOWBE4 -10.0
I guess it just took me posting here to notice. Whoops!
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Hoppe"
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 201
I'm trying to implement a very simple rule that looks at the "Received"
header(s) and if a string is found apply a negative score. The rule is as
follows:
headerAH_KNOWBE4 Received=~ /phishtest\.knowbe4\.com/
score AH_KNOWBE4 score -10.0
describe AH_KNOWBE4 Prevents KnowBe4 campaign
gt;
>> Am 30.08.2016 um 02:45 schrieb John Hardin:
>>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just learned about the sought ruleset via
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy. Is this ruleset
>>>> still activ
ot;SpamAssassin"
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 5:51:29 PM
Subject: Re: SoughtRules
Am 30.08.2016 um 02:45 schrieb John Hardin:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
>
>> I just learned about the sought ruleset via
>> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy
I just learned about the sought ruleset via
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy. Is this ruleset still
actively maintained? I'm considering implementing it in my environment, but
want to make sure just in case.
Thanks!
Our mail setup (Zimbra) uses postfix.
- Original Message -
From: "John Hardin"
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 4:20:22 PM
Subject: Re: Spoofed Domain
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
> Though I think I'd rather just reject...t
ges should always be
coming from itself (single mail server setup here).
I see how SPF may not be so reliable.
From: "Vincent Fox"
To: "Anthony Hoppe"
Cc: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 3:51:32 PM
Subject: Re: Spoofed Domain
You co
When you say SPF is not a good tool for filtering, do you mean that it
shouldn't be used at all? Or if SPF_FAIL is triggered that an email should be
rejected altogether?
From: "Vincent Fox"
To: "Anthony Hoppe" , "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Tuesday, Aug
Hmm, that's not a bad idea for this particular instance. I may do that.
From: "Rob McEwen"
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 3:01:57 PM
Subject: Re: Spoofed Domain
On 8/9/2016 5:56 PM, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
> Here are the headers as an exa
Hello All,
Although I've been a member of this list for a while, I'm still very much a
n00b when it comes to SpamAssassin. So please keep that in mind when you read
my message (don't hurt me!)... :-)
Someone out there has decided to spoof our domain and send us spam. My first
thought was tha
All,
I accidentally forwarded some spam to this list. Autocomplete got the best of
me and I chose "spamassassin" instead of "spamcop" in the "TO" field of the
message. I haven't received the message myself (not sure if I will), but wanted
to apologize in case any of you got it.
Happy, uh, Tu
Awesome. Thank you!
From: "Joe Quinn"
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 8:26:55 AM
Subject: Re: Repository of rules
On 9/8/2015 11:13 AM, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Hey All,
This is likely a n00b question, so I apologize.
I've been a member
Hey All,
This is likely a n00b question, so I apologize.
I've been a member of this list for a while. Periodically, I see rules develop
based on submissions of samples from other members. Is there, by chance, a
repository of rules like that somewhere I can reference? I'm not often able to
ke
Amir, I couldn't have said it better myself. I agree 100%. Not only is this
type of communication disrespectful to the OP, it is just as disrespectful to
the other members of this list as it is clogging their inboxes with garbage.
It does not contribute to the usefulness or helpfulness of thi
not sure how check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd() functions and what it returns if
true/false.
Thanks!
Anthony Hoppe
IS Support Technician II
Menlo Park City School District
(650) 321-7140 ext. 5272
aho...@mpcsd.org
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Martinec"
To: users@spamassassin.apache.
ame pattern, u...@domain.com exists both in the Return Path AND the From
field.
Anthony Hoppe
IS Support Technician II
Menlo Park City School District
(650) 321-7140 ext. 5272
aho...@mpcsd.org
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Warren"
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Se
think being able to use this to add
just a teeny bit to the spam score will help complement some of our current
rules.
Thanks!
~ Anthony
Anthony Hoppe
IS Support Technician II
Menlo Park City School District
(650) 321-7140 ext. 5272
aho...@mpcsd.org
We don't see them as much as we used to, but they still make an appearance
every once and a while.
~ Anthony
- Original Message -
From: "David F. Skoll"
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2013 9:33:55 AM
Subject: Re: Yahoo single link spam
Somewhat OT... are peop
25 matches
Mail list logo
