Hi,
Any updates on this ?
Tnx, Tuc
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:24 PM Scott Ellentuch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, as ec2-user running the make and then make test ends up failing.
> There are no issues with the port as a previous tcpdump has shown, it
> transfers data back and forth.
+ 280.71
cusr 26.08 csys = 308.25 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/217 test programs. 0/3765 subtests failed.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
Tuc
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:03 PM Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Scott Ellentuch wrote on 10/04/24 5:15 am:
> > Apologies, but I don't understand.
>
Apologies, but I don't understand.
I am running "make test" as the AWS user "ec2-user" when getting these
errors. Are you saying that its an acceptable error right now, and I can
just do the "sudo make install"?
Thanks, Tuc
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:58 PM Sid
prot opt source destination
Tnx, Tuc
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 2024-04-03 at 14:01:44 UTC-0400 (Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:01:44 -0400)
> Scott Ellentuch
> is rumored to have said:
>
> >
-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400)
> Scott Ellentuch
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't
> > go
> > well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makef
Hi,
Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't go
well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL)
I'm on Amazon Linux 2 , 4.0.1 SA, and not sure what other info I can give.
I installed every perl module it wanted.
The final summary is -
Test Summary
>An idea for an alternate collection method: run an imap server on your
>sa-learn training box, setup a second email account in Outlook for the
>users who are training, and have them just drag the ham/spam to training
>folders. I don't know if it's "better," but I'd prefer it myself to
tried:
#!/bin/bash
FILES=/home/mail/msg-1502747659-31280-0/*
echo "" > /home/mail/test/out
for f in $FILES
do
echo "Processing $f file..."
# take action on each file. $f store current file name
cat $f|formail >> /home/mail/test.out
done
Almost worked. It adds the needed "From" header and
>It should be OK, but it wouldn't be ideal to combine it with=20
>autotraining because the manual training wont be able to counter any=20
>mistraining of the tokens from the stripped headers.=20
> It would probably be a good idea to use a comprehensive ignoreheader=20
> list. You could start with
Hmmm. Doesn't sound good. I sent a simple text message through a large ISP,
to my server, arrived in a mbox. Compared that message to the one that was
POPed, then sent back as an attachment and stripped out via the existing
script.
These sanitized messages are pretty short but I put in
Maybe not rf822 format. This is a sample extracted single file:
https://pastebin.com/S9W4Z64N
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/message-rfc822-to-mbox-script-for-use-with-sa-learn-workflow-tp138362p138363.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users
I have a script that can take spam/ham messages forwarded as attachments from
Outlook and turn them into rfc822 individual files. It allows external
users to send me Outlook spam/ham for review. I will in turn feed sa-learn
with those messages once vetted. That part of the process is getting me
I'm chicken. :D
I don't have much (almost no) experience overriding those yum packages. And
those warnings I got when I rebuilt from source made me nervous.
Maybe when the dust settles...
--
View this message in context:
spamassassin than I did when I
started. Guess that's the silver lining to a few days of hair pulling.
Thanks,
Scott
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-auto-learn-not-happening-tp138065p138314.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Tom:
re selinux:
Yes, once I discovered the fix, I considered that could have been the casue.
FWIW I'm not using it and it's disabled, so it *shouldn't* hose anything.
But I would not be surprised if it were the culprit.
--
View this message in context:
I'm going to go back and look at my build notes but I think that directory
got created for me. It's just as possible i followed some "guide". I am
positive i did not think it up on my own LOL. I remember more than set of
instructions one with that path setting, and it very well could be the
Yeah, i don't know who the culprit is. sa-learn always worked. autolearn did
not. So far this am it's looking good. An expected spread of autolearn no,
spam, and ham. Not a single unavailable. Will check this afternoon and
expect to call this done. Summary for other googlers to follow.
--
Aug 10, 2017; 10:15pm Scottonline Scott Re: Bayes auto-learn - not
happening, tentative success
Well, here's a development...
About the only difference in my old, functioning box and this new "clean"
install was the location of the bayes files.
Old box:
/var/spool/amavisd/.sp
Well, here's a development...
About the only difference in my old, functioning box and this new "clean"
install was the location of the bayes files.
Old box:
/var/spool/amavisd/.spamassassin/
New box:
/etc/mail/bayes
The other details that caught my attention were that on the old box, the
Trying to check for any locking issues I ran sa-update in debug moed
su amavis -c 'sa-learn -D --spam --showdots --mbox /home/mail/onespam'
Appears to be creating and dropping lock files. Nothing left over after
running..
Aug 10 16:48:39.109 [7524] dbg: bayes: expiry starting
Aug 10
Scouring the differences between this and my old server I see this:
Old server:
-rw--- 1 amavis amavis 83472 Aug 10 15:51 bayes_journal
-rw--- 1 amavis amavis 1986 Aug 10 15:51 bayes.mutex
-rw--- 1 amavis amavis 328491008 Aug 10 15:51 bayes_seen
-rw--- 1 amavis
> Imho You need 100 ham and 100 spam to auto learning working. Do manual
learning
See earlier post today. I've got it loaded up, right?:
[root@tn2 mail]# su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic'
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0349
OK, so I don't think auto-learn works on spam. What about HAM?
I've raised the floor to auto-learn HAM to 1. Before anyone gives me any
grief, it's just for testing. I'll rebuild the bayes db from a corpus when
I get it working.
So SPAM takes the 3-way patch, 3 from the header, 3 from the
OK, so I don't think auto-learn works on spam. What about HAM?
I've raised the floor to auto-learn HAM to 1. Before anyone gives me any
grief, it's just for testing. I'll rebuild the bayes db from a corpus when
I get it working.
So SPAM takes the 3-way patch, 3 from the header, 3 from the
>surely, it makes no sense blow up the database with already 100%
>classified samples - you even don't do that uncnditional with a
>hand-trained database (at least not forever, at the begin it makes sense
>to get additional tokens)
I think you misunderstood my question. I meant that as I look at
If any particular message has a
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
Is it safe to assume that spam or one close to it has been learned and so it
would not be a candidate for auto-learn?
Maybe I'm not being patient enough.
--
View this
FYI, here's the verbose headers for that same one that flowed above:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 23.904
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=23.904 tag=- tag2=5 kill=6.4
tests=[BAYES_999=0.2, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=3.2,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.293,
Here is a debug log for one that just flowed. I don't see anything about why
auto-learn was unavailable. But it shows it's talking to the db anyway I
think.
Is there a way to set auto_learn_force to yes? The log format makes one
thing it's a global setting but all I can find it looks like a
Here's a verbose log of amavis/spamassassin processing another high score
that just came through. I don't see a peep about auto-learn. But it was
unavailable too.
(posting via nabble, apologies if it wraps)
Aug 10 11:03:39 mail2 amavis[377]: (00377-01) LMTP :10024
>why this?
>When you run from amavisd, you only need permission for amavis user, not
for
>anyone.
To be sure that is not the problem. I can tighten it up once working. I
understand thisis what one woudl normally use if they had a multi-user
enviroment. But it can't hurt the problem for
Another new one big score, auto-learn disabled. This one is fairly small.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=29.428 tag=- tag2=5 kill=6.4
tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.076, DCC_CHECK=3.2,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
FILL_THIS_FORM=0.001, FROM_MISSPACED=0.001, FROM_MISSP_SPF_FAIL=1,
>you need to train your bayes *by hand* to start with - how do you expect
>bayes classification with no hints afetr purge the database - train 200
>ham and spam mails and *after that* look further
Reindl:
Thanks. I want to use some auto-training with very conservative thresholds
set. All of
I was getting my commands missed up, been looking at this too long. When I
ran
su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D 2>&1 -t onespam'
That caused it to LEARN the spam. Database went from not there to one
learned. Auto-learn apparently. That's what it should have done when it
arrived.
Brand new spam
Benny:
re tflags
> tflags foo-rule-name noautolearn
> and you can force autolearn based on rulename
> https://lists.gt.net/spamassassin/users/184996
> there is a long thread there that explain it more
>and all condition must be met for learning
I read the thread. Nothing there concrete enough
Cleared the database, ran below on the same message:
su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D 2>&1 -t onespam' | less
I didn't see any errors obvious to me.
It recreated the databases and added this message as expected.
I don't know how to tell why it would not have auto-learned.
Can you tell/
Apologies, I meant sa-learn. Brain fart.
Thanks for the clarification on the 3-point rule.
I've had a bunch of them come through. They all get autolearn=no or I get a
few that say "unavailable" like the sample below. I gather from trying to
figure out myself that unavailable may be things
> some of the listed tags have tflags that disable autolearn
< there is nothing to fix here
Benny: Will you elaborate for me please? So I can understand and
self-help.
Better, what test flags in general disable auto-learn?
--
View this message in context:
The "3 points" criteria does not apply to manually learning via sa-update
then?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-auto-learn-not-happening-tp138065p138071.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Centos7
Postfix 3.2.2
Amavisd-new 2.11.0
Spamassassin 3.4.0
Site-wide configuration
This is a new box and I've configured some conservative values for auto-learn.
I've enabled it properly AFAIK, but I can't see any sign of it working.
I have these set in local.cf
use_bayes 1
David:
re: Postscreen weighted RBLs
I've got my postscreen setup with some weighted RBL's. But I was curious
what others did here. I searched for that subject and didn't get any
specific hits. Any particular thread you know of?
--
View this message in context:
spamassassin-3.4.1-14.fc27.src.rpm is available now.
When trying to rebuild that src (or the one you mentioned earlier) for my
Centos7 box I get these warnings:
Is this OK? Is there a fix?
spamc/libspamc.c: In function '_try_to_connect_tcp':
spamc/libspamc.c:490:19: warning: variable 'family'
Centos7
Posftfix 3.2.2
Amavisd 2.11.0
spamassassin-3.4.0
I have a logwatch output that gets mailed to me daily. Spamassassin is
scoring it high enough as exceed my threshold for whacking it as spam.
While this is not good, I'm concerned I have something fundamental
misconfigured where it
> I currently add bayes token information and relay information as headers to
> each msg processed. Especially relay information can be helpful ex if you
> have a script that parses received headers. With such headers thats much more
> easy, just look for the first untrusted hop
Tobi: Thank
I think I found th elist. "TEMPLATE TAGS"
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#template_tags
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Header-tests-shown-tp137911p137912.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing
I am using spamassassin via Amavisd-new. I have amavisd set to include
headers on spam and ham messages via "$sa_tag_level_deflt = -.0;"
2 questions...
1. I want to be sure I am configured to show as much detail as possibl efrom
spamassassin in my headers. I have these 3 lines in my
-Original Message-
From: users@spamassassin.apache.org
[mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:03 AM
To: sah62
Subject: Re: SpamCop Not Reporting
On 2014-10-23 22:40, sah62 wrote:
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 with Perl version 5.18.2 on
Our sa-update's have not found fresh updates for a couple of weeks now. Does
anyone know anything about this or are experiencing the same thing? It does
not look like they are erring out.
Thanks
...@rudersport.de
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: dependency hell
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 13:27 -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
I have a machine on which I'd like to run spamassassin.
But it's behind an air gap. It's not on the internet.
I've been downloading
filter.
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
Applied Research Labs, Computer Science Div. S224
University of Texas at Austin
) above and then tar up the
perl tree? Is it going to go to a different perl tree?
FWIW the box is (or will be) running linux.
(I'm ready to give up on this, frankly.)
j.
--
Jay Scott 512-835-3553g...@arlut.utexas.edu
Head of Sun Support, Sr. System Administrator
-update nightly.
What am I to do
Scott
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp104732p105825.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've got an IMAP account with a small ISP that uses CPanel (and, through it,
SpamAssassin 3.3.1). I've been struggling with spam for a while now, partially
hampered by my inability to access a command shell in order to manipulate SA.
As a result, my solution was to set my required_score = 0
have not been able to find version 6
Scott Ostrander
[18289] dbg: extracttext: X-ExtractText-Words: 0
Mar 7 10:22:18.259 [18289] dbg: extracttext: X-ExtractText-Chars: 0
Mar 7 10:22:18.389 [18289] dbg: bayes: header tokens for x-extracttext-chars =
0
Mar 7 10:22:18.389 [18289] dbg: bayes: header tokens for x-extracttext-words =
0
Thanks,
Scott
registered less than 15
days ago
tflags SEM_FRESH_15 net
score SEM_FRESH_15 1.9
Thanks,
Scott Ostrander
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: Several rules not hitting on 3.4 that do hit on 3.3.2
On 03/06/2013 11:17 PM, Scott Ostrander wrote:
I am finding several stock rules and a custom rule that are not hitting when
used on my SA 3.4 install.
You're using the third party
-Country? If so how?
Any other insights on how to get SA 3.4 to resolve this Relay-Country?
The email with this issue is at http://pastebin.com/vFfEuY3A
Thanks,
Scott Ostrander
From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.eu]
Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 20:22:
On system A (SA 3.4) I am getting RELAY_COUNTRY_XX Same email on
system B (SA 3.2.2) I get RELAY_COUNTRY_ES correctly resolved.
ip2cc 2.104.223.10
if not found you need updates
XX is imho ip
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:37 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4
Scott Ostrander skrev den 2013-03-05 21:15:
plase fix your reply template, replyed sender email should not be in body
content
However
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:13 PM
To: Scott Ostrander; Benny Pedersen; spamassassin
Subject: Re: X-Relay-Countries on 3.3.2 vs 3.4
Is there a way to upgrade GeoIP ?
I think you have to grab files from http://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/geolite
Maxmind says
Would someone put some samples of Yahoo single link spam on PasteBin.
I am trying to test my rules and I seem to be missing some of the variations.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:supp...@junkemailfilter.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 12:20 PM
To: users
many
virtual sites on the server so there could be many 'sales' users.
Ideally if spamass-milter could pass the entire email address to SA I
could deal with this in my control panel.
I do use the $GLOBAL user for global settings and this part does work fine
Thanks,.
Scott.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5
Thanks again!
I updated my /etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter config with the following:
EXTRA_FLAGS=-r 20 -u defaultuser -e defaultdomain
I also set the SQL query in SA's local.cf back to the default and it
now filtered by email address instead of just the username.
Scott.
On Mon, May 16, 2011
have no aliases.
Any ideas?
Scott.
dependency will go away.
But check your debug output to see if it is really getting the text
extraction.
Scott
-Chars: 0
Not extracted.
I get the same results in SA 3.3.1 on CentOS 5.5
It works fine in SA 3.2.5 on the same host
Scott
-ExtractText-Tools: antiword
[7828] dbg: extracttext: X-ExtractText-Types: application/msword
[7828] dbg: extracttext: X-ExtractText-Extensions: doc
Any thoughts on how to get it to work with 3.3.1?
_
Scott Ostrander
Staff System Administrator
On May 28, 2010 John Hardin wrote:
I am having the same issue,
In fact, I was going to post the same exact question.
We've been having a problem with emails that are completely blank
except for an attached .rtf file which is where the spam message is.
Is there a way of decoding that file
Jose Luis,
I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8,
reviewing SA logs shows the following message:
warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
in response
It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8
Can anybody point me in the direction of a document or place where I
could find information about setting up a solo Linux Debian server
running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that sends the mail along
to an exchange server?
Scott Lavoie
Owner
Mars Computer, LLC
99 Center ST.
Bangor
Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Hello.
I'm writing my custom rule
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL 5.0
(for add five points to e-mail contains www.viapaypal.com
http://www.viapaypal.com/ into body)
I've add it to
Hello,
This is what it realised:
I setup some spamstraps reporting the Subjects to a Central Server.
This Server generates a rule file periodicaly and the clients loads this
file into SA.
The Disadvantages of this System are:
- Time delay (I can't refresh/update the Database every 5Minutes)
-
4.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ps axu | grep spamd
root 18580 0.0 0.1 1736 588 pts/2S14:00 0:00 grep spamd
Scott Pichelman
Systems Administrator
Weir Minerals North America
2701 S Stoughton Rd
Madison WI 53716 USA
T: +(00)1 608 226 5615
F: +(00)1 608 221 5807
M: +(00)1 608
I had the exact same problem with a mySQL setup. The problem was
permissions, the mySQL user did not have delete permissions for the that
table so it could not remove the rows. Once I did that, everything
started working fine.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Koontz [mailto:[EMAIL
Headquarters...
Scott Larsen
Cascade Corporation
-
to you. You can find it at http://babelfish.altavista.com/.
Peace.
--
W. Scott Lockwood III
System Administrator
to him. You can find it in
http://babelfish.altavista.com/. peace.
Hihihi... :)
Yes, horrible, but the essence is still there, and is better than, say,
total lack of comprehension, which is what I get trying to read it in
Spanish.
--
W. Scott Lockwood III
Systems Administrator
Cashnetusa.com
bet would be to setup SMTP auth on your own server.
--
W. Scott Lockwood III
Systems Administrator
Cashnetusa.com
Land line: 312-568-4224
Cell: 847-800-4896
Help: x4357
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
RCVD_IN_XBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL,UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no
version=3.1.1
I keep getting these messages with really low scores that
Is that per user? So, if I nuke the whitelist, this should go away?
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 17:37 +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-79.4 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
non-token data: last expire
reduction count
Thanks
Scott
-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Kopel
English Department - FSU
850 644 6177
you ask
Squirrelmail to create a folder. I'm sure it's a permissions issue, I just
have no idea where to fix it, and the logs have been less than helpful.
Anyone else run into this?
--
Regards,
Scott
Sorry, wrong list! Please disregard - unless you know the answer! :-D
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lockwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:22 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Install of 1.4.8 with Courier IMAP
I am almost certain
I have DCC installed and running on my Linux box, running Postfix and
using Amavisd-new to query SA.
In my local.cf file, I have
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_add_header 1
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
But if I grep my amavis logs for dcc and/or Razor, I don't see
anything... I think I
Has anyone figured a good recipe for blocking these type of spam yet?
I get 3-5 per day to each user on my mail server.
Thanks
Original Message
Subject:Re: Work has been closed permanently
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:28:50 +0600
From: Leslie Hilton [EMAIL
thinking about this a little bit...
If I am not mistaken the BayesDB is db3?
Can it not be compiled against DB4, then you can set the memory cache in a
DB_CONFIG file. This way you get the performance of a ramdisk, but do not run
the risk of losing the DB...
just my $0.02...
--
Regards,
Scott Ryan
=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID3
--
Regards,
Scott Ryan
Telkom Internet
-
Good judgement comes with experience.
Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
-
On Thursday 17 August 2006 09:40, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote with regard to -
Re: Missing Checks :
Scott Ryan wrote:
What was be the difference in configs between two servers if when
scanning the same message 1 marks it as not spam and only does the
following checks: dbg: check: tests
On Thursday 17 August 2006 10:59, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote with regard to -
Re: Missing Checks :
Scott Ryan wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 09:40, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote with regard to
-
Re: Missing Checks :
Scott Ryan wrote:
What was be the difference in configs between two
(to management) something looks seriously wrong.
Any advice here would be appreciated
--
Regards,
Scott Ryan
Telkom Internet
-
Good judgement comes with experience.
Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement
**
Whis is it not doing as many checks as the FC5 machine? How can I change this?
--
Regards,
Scott Ryan
Telkom Internet
-
Good judgement comes with experience.
Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
-
On Monday 14 August 2006 17:55, Theo Van Dinter wrote with regard to - Re: Not
doing checks :
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:41:40PM +0200, Scott Ryan wrote:
[11431] dbg: check:
tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_I
N_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID [29351
If I'm not mistaken, bayes_autolearn 1 should actually be
bayes_auto_learn 1
anyone please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. adieu
Scott
Loren Wilton wrote:
[11208] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
rewrite_header_subject *SPAM*
rewrite_header Subject SPAM
if you can, but I get the feeling that those drone
computers over seas sending out the spam might not show up in court.
-- Scott
My 2 cents on spam: www.knyght.net/badspam.htm
On May 12, 2006, at 8:37 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
So - has anyone here actually sued a spammer? I'm seriously
We have a website built by a contracted programmer... the website will send
an email (using CDOsys) when sending to a client with spamassassin the
email was blocked one of our users is copied on the email..she can
forward the email to the client and it will get through the
GB EU
This to me says that the plugin is working as expected. I wanted to add
this information to the headers so I add_header all Relay-Country
_RELAYCOUNTRY_ however the X-Spam-Relay-Country header is always empty.
Any clues?
--
Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Linux Technology Center
imap spamc[15019]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
--
Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Linux Technology Center
Craig Green wrote:
Scott Russell wrote:
Greets.
Running SA 3.1.0 with spamc/spamd on RHEL4 i386. I have the following
options for my spamd: -d --allow-tell --max-children=30
--min-children=10 --min-spare=3 --max-spare=6 -q -x -u spamd
Today I saw the following error in /var/log/maillog
header checks rejecting the message. Check your postfix config.
--
Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Linux Technology Center
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
