Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:29:29PM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> My thoughts were definitely the threads in amavis getting mixed up.
> I would definitely look at that path because I'm sure if you do
> spamassassin -t -D on the mbox format email post-amavis, you'll find
> it doesn't repeat
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:19:52PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 01/23, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I do see this IP number several times, but it tried to send a completely
> > different email to someone else on my server.
>
> I was just about to ask if it m
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:59:43AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Am I looking at a bug in SA? And/Or, how do I debug this, please?
> Baffling. Checking your maillogs, you don't see that IP anywhere?
I do see this IP number several times, but it tried to send a completely
different email to s
Hi,
recently, my spamassassin started to score system messages as spam,
mentioning IP numbers not in the email:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: xx...@oeko.net
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by w3.oeko.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1E725CEA
for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 0
Hi,
On Tue, 05.07.2011 at 07:18:30 +, Jason Ede
wrote:
> Andreas Schulze [mailto:s...@andreasschulze.de] wrote:
> > - bind (off course)
although I'm sure that it was meant in a different way, "off course"
hits the nail right onto the head, imnsho.
> Are there any figures on the relative
Hi,
On Mon, 04.07.2011 at 13:23:42 +0200, Axb wrote:
> >Well, together with the auth server it creates an "ecosystem" with
> >some (limited) vendor lock-in capability.
>
> "vendor lock-in" ? be explicit, please.
last I looked PowerDNS highlighted some custom DNS RR types (on the
wire) that wer
Hi Warren,
On Mon, 04.07.2011 at 01:03:46 -1000, Warren Togami Jr.
wrote:
> I heard others recommend unbound, but I haven't tried it yet. Is it
> more RAM efficient than other alternatives, and fast?
I haven't specifically conducted tests about its memory efficiency, but
I do use it on severa
Hi Warren,
On Mon, 04.07.2011 at 00:46:15 -1000, Warren Togami Jr.
wrote:
> http://www.spamtips.org/2011/07/spamassassin-why-run-your-own-dns.html
>
> Anyone have any better tips of an alternate DNS resolver, or
> configuration options to improve this suggested configuration?
while I do agree
Hi,
On Tue, 21.06.2011 at 07:30:51 -0700, Marc Perkel
wrote:
> Thanks David but I need real time updating and it's spread across
> multiple servers. So need PostgreSQL or MySQL.
just a shot in the dark: Maybe you can use mnesia, which is distributed
and should be _quite_ fast. It's not SQL, ho
Hi,
On Wed, 15.06.2011 at 08:35:09 -0700, julio maidanik wrote:
> Are there any HOWTOs with clear instructions of how to install on a
> site-wide basis.?
what are you looking for?
On my server(s), I can say "pkg_add p5-Mail-SpamAssassin" or "aptitude
install spamassassin", and then I have t
On Wed, 08.12.2010 at 11:33:11 -0600, Matt wrote:
> Anyone using the Fake MX trick?
> http://www.webhostingtalk.com/wiki/Fake_MX
> Is it safe to use a fake high and low mx?
I tried the high MX for some time, but in my experience, spammers
usually only hit the first two MXes. So if you were usin
Hi,
On Wed, 01.12.2010 at 16:13:06 +, Martin Gregorie
wrote:
> I don't think that would help at all. Bots would just pretend to be mail
> servers and use SMTP. Any other form of spam could be circumvented by
> setting up spammer-owned MTAs that spammers would use to inject spam.
nothing ne
Hi,
On Wed, 01.12.2010 at 11:02:54 -0500, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
> On 12/1/10 10:56 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> >Ok, now let's be serious, there*must* be a reason why this didn't
> >happen long ago, right?
> Because the internet 'must be free'. as in acc
Hi,
On Wed, 01.12.2010 at 10:50:49 -0500, Michael Scheidell
wrote:
> On 12/1/10 10:33 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> >And authentication will stop spam... how?
> >>> Thoughts?
> >You're wasting your time.
> Ditto. we can't even get big providers (Microsoft/blackberry) or
> ISP's to adhere to cur
Hi,
On Mon, 19.07.2010 at 09:43:20 -0600, Brian Godette wrote:
> I hope you realize you still need to deal with the issues of users
> with weak/guessable passwords and phishing of account info as well
> as the newer bots that recover account info from Outlook/Outlook
> Express/Thunderbird.
this
Hi,
On Wed, 24.02.2010 at 22:18:04 -0500, alexus wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Toni Mueller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23.02.2010 at 14:08:30 -0500, alexus wrote:
> >> is there a way to put sa-learn --spam inside of .qmail?
> -bash-3.2# man preline
> No manua
On Tue, 23.02.2010 at 14:08:30 -0500, alexus wrote:
> is there a way to put sa-learn --spam inside of .qmail?
man preline
HTH,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Wed, 27.01.2010 at 10:35:20 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Will the new 3.3 be announced for Lenny (possibly via backports) or do I
> need to use CPAN?
you could probably file a wishlist bug against spamassassin, and/or
prod someone to do it?
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Kin
On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 12:52:44 -0500, Jeff Koch
wrote:
> Of course an iPhone can see IMAP folders. But what's going to sort mail
> into folders when I'm traveling for a week and the office PC is turned
> off?
The server on which the imap server runs?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 11:44:49 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Jeff Koch wrote:
>> I have to say that it is extremely annoying that this mailing list does
>> not put a tag identifying itself in the subject line. Every other
>> mailing list of a similar technical natur
Hi,
On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 17:40:55 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On tir 15 dec 2009 17:36:56 CET, Toni Mueller wrote
>> HTML in emails is usually a synonym for "F*CKING SH*T".
>
> most users that try doing it is maybe just trying to write in red or white :)
this is imh
Hi,
On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 08:22:44 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Get a modern email client.
>
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
looks like I should start blacklisting individual subscribers.
HTML in emails is usually a synonym for "F*CKI
Hi,
On Fri, 11.12.2009 at 11:46:31 +0100, bernics.gabor
wrote:
> Nobody?
>
> -- Forwarded Message ---
> My SP dont view the users specific configuration
> (/home/$user/.spamassassin/user_prefs) only the main configuration
> (/etc/spamassassin/*).
man 8 spamd
I find the descri
Hi,
On Fri, 30.10.2009 at 15:09:20 -0700, djjmj wrote:
> Thank you for your interest and support. I will keep pushing our ISP to use
> this forum for a resolution.
please learn about how email works. Really.
You only sent an obfuscated log about an email conversation with your
ISP, but not th
Hi,
On Sat, 31.10.2009 at 09:16:07 -0400, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> Does anyone have a procmail recipe that incorporates clamav into the checks,
> and one that handles the clamav output to /dev/null the viri etc?
which mail system do you use?
I'm using this setup together with qmail-ldap and qma
Hi,
On Fri, 30.10.2009 at 14:13:45 -0700, djjmj wrote:
> Outlook 2007 for most of the clients under our domain are now having outgoing
> emails blocked by Spam Assassin, which our ISP uses. This started in late
> September (Outlook/MS update??). Simple Text emails with "hello" or "test"
> get s
Hi,
On Fri, 23.10.2009 at 11:32:16 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I seriously doubt it, besides this probably not being applicable to
> > spamming from the UK (not Germany).
>
> One interesting thing about the T-Mobile spam I got is - it was clearly
Hi,
On Fri, 23.10.2009 at 10:54:02 +0200, Andreas Rehmer wrote:
> i dont know it exactly but i dont think it. One day before the
> Bundestagswahl in Germany. Guido Westerwelle (Leader from an big faction)
> send around a Spam-Mail to vote for his faction. I think its enough that
> you can s
Hi,
On Mon, 05.10.2009 at 14:11:46 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Thomas Mullins wrote:
>> I will pull out our BSD box, and I will let them connect the Exchange
>> box straight to the Net.
> Second bet: how long it takes after doing that before the box is 0wned.
I wouldn't ho
Hi,
On Mon, 05.10.2009 at 15:42:04 -0400, Thomas Mullins
wrote:
> We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my
> coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained
> enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable
> FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes.
more
Hi Romain,
On Mon, 24.08.2009 at 13:25:33 +0200, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
> returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everything for 'ham').
ok.
> Check the detailed log of FuzzyOcr (not of SA) ; it's likely it's
> missing some
Hi,
I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
"spamassassin -D " on a message containing image spam, I can only see
that the FuzzyOcr plugin is being called, that it creates it's
databases, but nothing els
Hi,
On Fri, 21.08.2009 at 13:43:26 -0600, Karl Pearson
wrote:
> Nothing free is worth a cent.
this only goes to show that money isn't that much of a universal metric
as it's touted to be. If you've lost all other metrices, then I'm sorry
for you.
"Can't buy me love" (Beatles)
Kind regards
Hi,
although I missed out on the bulk of the discussion, I have to say this
to Ted's email:
On Fri, 21.08.2009 at 10:46:55 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I agree. We're and ISP and I don't want us to be associated with
> companies like Google. I don't want Google operating in my market and
Hi,
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 18:26:40 -0400, Dave wrote:
> Postfix on my server, the backup mx is using qmail.
do you control the backup MX, or is it something external?
Unfortunately, plain qmail can't do that much to block spam w/o some
help. If you control the machine in question, try to
Hi,
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 13:33:20 -0400, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> In /var/lib/sa/keys
I have neither such a directory, nor any keys in either of
/var/lib/spamassassin nor /var/db/spamassassin (depending on which of
my machines I look at).
But
> [r...@coyote keys]# cd /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa
Hello,
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 12:09:43 -0400, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >[2] http://taint.org/2007/08/15/004348a.html
>
> This site has the procedure I used. Several times.
I used this procedure just today, with no problem at all.
> [g..
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 11:40:24 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Nothing says "Buy my stuff" better than an email done in fuzzy distorted
> letters. 8-)
Ok, got it. ;}
Although I'm still amazed about how spam does bring in business in the
first place.
Sorry for being a bit thick.
Kind regards
Hi,
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 14:38:12 +0100, RW wrote:
> It's like a traditional anonymous letter, with letters cut from
> different sources, with different colours, fonts and backgrounds.
thank you.
> To be fair it is in Cyrillic, so FuzzyOCR wouldn't have caught it
> without an appropriate wor
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 08:28:21 -0400, Dan Schaefer
wrote:
> Dan Schaefer wrote:
>> Why haven't spammers think about this approach before? I can image it
>> is very difficult for Fuzzy OCR to tag this with a high score.
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/m247b74c8
> Oops. Why haven't spammers *thought a
Hi,
On Wed, 19.08.2009 at 08:49:22 +0100, Arthur Dent
wrote:
> I only run sa-update once per day and the last two days it has failed
> with a SHA1 verification error.
I just discovered a very similar problem:
# sa-update -D --channelfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
--g
Hi,
On Tue, 18.08.2009 at 12:06:30 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Toni Mueller wrote:
>> Understood. FWIW, (not only) I need newer rules because the current
>> rules are becoming ineffective at a fast pace.
>> Of course, but what do you want to say with that? From my
Hi Ted,
On Tue, 18.08.2009 at 11:06:32 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/tags/
> you will find that
>
> sa-update_3.2_20090720142344/ 795855 4 weeks jm tagging latest
> update release for 3.2
>
> 795855 -is- the latest rules release for 3.2.5
o
Hi,
I notice that there are no rules updates for 3.2.5 since about
2009-07-21, with the latest version shipped being 795855. FWIW, I
queried different DNS servers in different networks to forestall stale
DNS cache data for the number, but uniformly got this result.
The "daily QA testing pages",
44 matches
Mail list logo
