Hi,
I use spamc -C report to report spam mails. I only want to report them
to Pyzor. How do I disable reporting the mails to Razor (which fails
anyways as I'm not registered)?
Also as I see it using spamc -C report also marks the mail as spam in
the bayes database, is this correct? There is no do
On 2022-05-06 6:56 am, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 12:31:47PM +0200, giovanni@paclan.itwrote:
> On 5/6/22 11:08, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: Hi, I have a setup where the
> spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the data of the mail-servers.
> Now I was
at rule is from 25_uribl.cf <http://25_uribl.cf>
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail> - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:4
Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail> - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:31 PM <mailto:spamassas...@bluestreak.net>> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm using the KAM rule
Greetings,
I'm using the KAM ruleset and have noticed that, even though I don't
have the KAMOnly plugin installed, the KAMONLY encapsulated rules are
still getting fired. In particular the rescored rules. How can I disable
this feature?
Thanks in advance!
Nedry
spamassassin
Without any further params. How am I supposed to know where that command
does get its package from???
Christian
Ok so it seems I cant do anything to get it running on my side.
Funny enough that I use the official raspian which I kept up to date
with 'sudo apt-get update'
and now the 'sudo apt-get install that claims to use the newest version
(3.4.2-1+deb10u3) keeps running into such an error.
How to find
Hi there,
when running a 'sudo apt-get install spamassassin' on my raspian pi 3b+
i keep running into a problem with sa-compile:
sa-compile (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) wird eingerichtet ...
Running sa-compile (may take a long time)
In file included from
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/perl
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
I've had good luck with using mariadb and galera to share the
spamassassin database across systems. I run a small 3-node setup for
email, 2x servers running dovecot replicating to each
d to allocate per user!
That would be pretty hard to predict as it would vary a lot based on the
users and the mail.
I don't think Bayes is really that big (a few MB max?)
It's not big. Here's my personal spamassassin database (just a few
users, but SA has been running for years and
registered).
I am having good success using Mail::SPF::Query with spamassassin
The spfquery tool also appears to work.
This bug report from 2014 reflects my experience.
Bug #99890 for Mail-SPF: Mail-SPF-v2.9.0 fails Build test
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=99890
My guess for the ca
Mail::SPF version 2.009 is package "Mail-SPF-v2.9.0" which is what I
indicated I was using (and had to force install) in my first post.
spfquery works, but whatever perl interface SA is using is not producing
correct results. Not just on my own domains, but on many others as well. My
dns spf reco
Thanks for the tip! I didn't know how to debug that stuff. Here's what
happens with a spammer faking one of my own domains:
>spamd[21654]: spf: query for
>isabelle.2...@nro.ca/41.203.191.125/!41.203.191.125!: result: permerror,
>comment: , text: Included domain 'srs.bis.na.blackberry.com' has no
Hi. I'm getting T_SPF_PERMERROR extremely often. Not exclusively, but
especially when spammers are faking my own domain names.
Here's an example from the good old xerox copier spam:
From cop...@nro.ca Fri May 26 08:26:18 2017
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 17.34, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 17:10 -0400, btb wrote:
>> On 2016.09.23 16.16, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:43 +0100, RW wrote:
Right, but the question here is why isn't a forwarding server also a
recursiv
From: headers:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeadersEqual
[/path/to/HeadersEqual.pm]
header SENDER_MISMATCH eval:headers_equal("ne", "From:addr",
"Return-Path:addr")
score SENDER_MISMATCH 0.5
As you can see, SA will increase the score by 0.5 when
spamd[22776]: prefork: child states: II
On 06/24/2016 08:40 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2016-06-24 20:22, G.H. (Spamassassin) wrote:
>
>>> I notice that the DNS whitelisting rules are missing too, and the SPF
>>> rules are replaced by a custom rule LOCAL_SPF_PASS.
>&
On 06/24/2016 07:53 PM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:20:35 +0200
> G.H. (Spamassassin) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Every incoming mail with valid DKIM-signatures is tagged with
>> T_DKIM_INVALID.
>> But when I run such a mail through spamassassin -t -D d
Hello,
Every incoming mail with valid DKIM-signatures is tagged with
T_DKIM_INVALID.
But when I run such a mail through spamassassin -t -D dkim < email it
finds no errors?
I already googled this but it always comes down to missing packages that
are being reported with the debug, but in my c
Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I know those apps are current for my OS, which is essentially
Ubuntu 12.04 (due to be updated soon).
My MTA is postfix but I generally reject or discard through that,
whereas SA delivers most stuff to the junk bin as a final check by me.
I was unaware
Bill, thanks for your input.
As far as I am aware the versions are the latest for my OS - Mint Maya
13 is essentially Ubuntu 12.04 - but I will check. In any case I'm due
to update the OS in the near future.
My MTA is postfix but I find it easier to manage rules in SA than in
postfix, which
And a convenient spam purporting to come from google verifies the second
part of the test. Thanks again. :)
--
Dave Stiles
scores to 0.01 to avoid false rejections). Is this code
known to fail or is it something I'm doing wrong?
Spamassassin version: 3.3.2
Perl version: 5.14.2
OS: Linux Mint 13
=
The section header for the code runs...
"penalize mail claiming to be from PayPal, eBay, Yahoo or Gma
> On Dec 19, 2015, at 04.35, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 19.12.2015 um 04:08 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net:
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My second SA is a Zimbra server.
>>> I use Zimbra SA only to drop the message in junk folder.
>>> I don'
an a milter, you could
just deliver mail directly from amavis to the zimbra mailbox server [bypassing
the zimbra mta which you don't need in term of this] via lmtp [typically port
7025], and it would just work. none of the attempting to trick one instance of
spamassassin with anot
com.cf" containing the include directives as well
as the subfolder containing the actuall rules files.
"saInternalChannel" does not evaluate after "updates_spamassassin_org", so the
regular SpamAssassin updates overwrite our rescoring.
It seems we need to rename our channel to
Hi,
We created our own internal channel to feed our SpamAssassin installations with
some custom rules.
Recently tried to re-score a SpamAssassin rule using the channel files, but it
does not work.
When the channel is updated it correctly downloads the
"saInternalChannel_mydoamin_c
ainly - we just do housekeeping in the cron job which runs sa-compile
for now, and that's just fine.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7138
-ben
i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
> On Feb 04, 2015, at 09.19, btb wrote:
>
> hi-
>
> i happened to notice a bunch of old files in /tmp/, related to spamassassin.
> after a bit of testing, it looks like sa-compile isn't cleaning up after
>
based on domain name age?
>> the newer the domain, the higher the score is pushed up?
>
> that's URIBL_RHS_DOB
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/URIBL_RHS_DOB
>
> sadly it turned out to be not that relieable for a very high score
revisiting this - am
this was discussed a while back, in the context of tlds with names of colors
[red, blue, pink, etc]. recently, i'm getting spam from the "rocks" tld [i can
share further detail if it's of interest]. what ultimately happened with the
color tlds, in terms of spamassassin?
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 15.42, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 30. nov. 2014 21.12.06 listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>
>> http://dpaste.com/3XTYV0V.txt
>
> Is trusted_networks and internal_networks correct both for ipv4 and ipv6 ?
>
> Does it match settings in amavisd ?
>
> Both sa and am
ayes: DB journal sync: last sync: ".$vars[7],'bayes','-1');
> + dbg("bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: %s", $vars[7]);
>
> The extra parameters shouldn't have been in that dbg call.
>
> See:
> Bug 7065 - Debug Mode breaks Bayes but only i
t; (Queue-Id: 70BD3358))
>>
>> thanks
>> -ben
> I see a message from you at 5:47 PM yesterday (UTC-05:00) which includes the
> output of some commands like sa-learn --dump magic.
> http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/different-results-when-using-debug-td113494.html
&
hi-
i sent a message to the list yesterday, but have not yet seen it appear. can
someone check? my logs indicate successful delivery to mx1.us.apache.org:
Dec 3 17:48:24 mta postfix/smtp[10226]: 3jtFgN6Dfmz9s2b:
to=, relay=mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136]:25,
delay=56, delays=0.45/0.02/30/
. am i doing
something wrong? are my expectations misguided? i'm doing these tests as the
user named amavis, which the amavis software runs as.
>spamassassin --test-mode --debug < message3.txt
Dec 2 23:32:41.224 [27222] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
Dec 2 23:32:41.224
hi-
a message from yahoo seems to have matched FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, which from my
perspective, the message is not forged [see below pastebin - i hope i've not
removed anything of importance during anonymization]. i noted that dkim
authentication appears to have failed, which, while of interest f
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 00.35, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>
>> all of the emotional postulative opining aside, one possibility i have been
>> considering is having postfix delay relay of messages to the content filter
>> for a few minutes,
/mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201411.mbox/%3C5458FFE3.10404%40bitrate.net%3E
understanding now what's going on, i've been thinking a bit about this, while
the frequency of this trend seems to be continuing to increase. as a possibly
meaningless anecdote, it
On Sep 8, 2014, at 21.45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Some discussion of the underlying issue.
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 02:59 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> At the time of the 3.3.2 release, the .club TLD simply didn't exist. It
>> has been accepted by IANA just recently. Of course I was
On Aug 27, 2014, at 18.13, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06 PM -0400 btb
> wrote:
>
>> hi-
>>
>> we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
>> interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
>> [containing t
Original Message
> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 18:39:58 -0700
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dealing with a bad network device affecting DNS
lookups
>
> --On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:26 AM +
Original Message
> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 15:04:22 -0700
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> To: Dave Warren , users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dealing with a bad network device affecting DNS
lookups
>
> --On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:52 PM -0700 Dave Warren
>
On 13.06.2014 19:47, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/13/2014 6:15 PM, spamassas...@lcwsoft.com wrote:
On 12.06.2014 22:14, spamassas...@lcwsoft.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on a plugin to check X-PHP-Script and am wondering if
there is a way to add the IP to the DNSBL check list?
Regards,
La
On 12.06.2014 22:14, spamassas...@lcwsoft.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on a plugin to check X-PHP-Script and am wondering if
there is a way to add the IP to the DNSBL check list?
Regards,
Lawrence
I'm guessing nobody knows the answer
Hi guys,
I am working on a plugin to check X-PHP-Script and am wondering if
there is a way to add the IP to the DNSBL check list?
Regards,
Lawrence
On 23/01/12 12:22, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> Resolving the block might be as simple as using your own caching
> nameserver to avoid being lumped together with other users queries;
> setting up your own mirror of the DNS-blocklist; or paying to use the
> blocklist. The choice is up to the DNS-Blocklist
On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
> The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
> To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
> an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that
it do
ly random, so there's nothing to cache. Any write to the
> table will invalidate caches anyway. And those writes happen every time a
> token is read (atime is updated).
To stop the query cache being invalidated, it would probably be better
if the writes were queued and then done in batches. C
On 23/12/11 11:29, Henrik K wrote:
>> Performance with the database on physical disks simply wasn't
>> keeping up with more than about double the average message rate (if
>> that...), so I fell back to the "good enough" setup of putting the
>> SA database on a RAMdisk,
> I guess it still boils do
Hi there,
There isn't really much documentation for any Windows related topics since
Michael Bell's tutorial site is offline as well as SpamAssassin for Win32
project being discontinued.
However, while compiling an own version of native (so not Cygwin based) Windows
SpamAssassin, I&
On 30/11/11 07:17, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> I've attached version 2.0 with this email (it's the clean version without
>>> all the comments :) ). I've pretty much finished up the definitions and
>>> some cleaning up. Again, I would really enjoy feedba
On 24/11/11 13:18, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
>> If a message comes in to my MTA with one of those Message-Id's in the
>> "In-Reply-To" header, it bypasses the spam filtering because it is a
>> response to a message that I sent
>
> what about if your message was stored in a folder of your correspo
On 23/11/11 17:55, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
> What do I mean? you never never answer (or it is really strange) a
> spam message.
On my personal email system, my MSA records Message-Id's of outgoing
mail into a database. If a message comes in to my MTA with one of those
Message-Id's in the "In-Re
> Probably hit by a bug in NetAddr::IP, see:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
>
> Upgrade it to NetAddr-IP-4.055 or downgrade to 4.048.
Bingo! I upgraded to 4.056 and no more problem!
Apparently there'a a workaround, too, mentioned
For some reason, spamassassin thinks that 0/0 is trusted, even after my
most strenuous attempts to dissuade it:
$ grep _networks /etc/spamassassin/*
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:# trusted_networks 212.17.35.
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:clear_trusted_networks
/etc/spamassassin
he problem.
Ken
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Also this is my /etc/default/spamass-milter
OPTIONS="-u nobody -i 127.0.0.1,209.102.124.20 -r 9 -M"
What strikes me odd is that the message that was stopped the milter had its
id set to "spamass-milte
Also this is my /etc/default/spamass-milter
OPTIONS="-u nobody -i 127.0.0.1,209.102.124.20 -r 9 -M"
What strikes me odd is that the message that was stopped the milter had
its id set to "spamass-milter"
Jun 15 06:27:31 mail spamd[981]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1]
at port 42
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 15/06/2011 11:13 PM, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Lawrence,
Thanks for the responce. I know Spam Assassin doesn't stop it we use a
spamassassin milter for sendmail to reject it. (We been doing this for
years). Anyway he
Lawrence,
Thanks for the responce. I know Spam Assassin doesn't stop it we use a
spamassassin milter for sendmail to reject it. (We been doing this for
years). Anyway here is a log on a email that was rejected:
Jun 15 06:27:33 mail spamd[981]: spamd: identified spam (22.2/6.0
Hello,
I have something I cannot explain. We blacklisted an email address for a
client but Spam assassin still let it through. Here are the logs:
Jun 15 08:08:10 mail spamd[20901]: spamd: identified spam (104.0/6.0) for
client:2130 in 0.2 seconds, 1729 bytes.
Jun 15 08:08:10 mail spamd[20
Hello,
I don't keep constant eye on the mail server logs but did notice that
pyzor was not working. I've ping the server that I've been using for
years:
# pyzor ping
82.94.255.100:24441 TimeoutError:
And see it is not working. I did a "pyzor discover" and found a public
server and did
age-
> From: Support SpamAssassin [mailto:spamassas...@jam-software.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:39 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Charles G
From: Emin Akbulut [mailto:eminakbu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:54 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have
different scores.
Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info...
___
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Gregory
>
> Now if I have to GUESS on insufficient data, I would suspect that the 'port'
> of
> spamd to Windows(?) does not properly tidy up its children when finished.
> The fact that it crashes certainly points in this direction.
> May I presume that
ation in the SA wiki.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReportingSpam
Many thanks again, Jason
>> How do I remove checking with RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW and RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE
>>
>> -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low
>> trust
>> [67.131.25.23 listed in list.dnswl.org]
>> -2.0 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFERBL:
Hi,
How do I remove checking with RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW and RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[67.131.25.23 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-2.0 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFERBL: Sende
Hi,
After upgrading to 3.3.0. I began to get an error
Jan 29 03:12:40.458 [9168] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC):
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DomainKeys.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
lib /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor
> Of course. You have to remove everything from
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000 that you do not want to use. As an example,
> that is what remains here:
Thank you
>> So how do I stop using sare or openprotect?
>
> remove the rules?
> remove the channels?
>
> I suppose you know if you use them or not, do you?
Yes I am using it. Since the blog advise to stop using it,
thus I am wondering how do I do so? I had remove the sa-update
from my crontab. Do I need t
> http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
>
> If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for
> RPM packages and distro-specific notes.
* STOP USING SARE or OpenProtect. They died a long time ago. Some of
their rules are dangerous or redundant.
>>
>> I am running a qmail + simscan + spamassassin + clamav on a
>> centos 5.3.
>>
>> Regards
>>
> there are many ways to do it...
>
> you could try
>
> @example.com
>
> in your
>
> /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
>
> might
>> How do I exclude a domain from a server-wide envoirment?
>>
>>
> with magic words ? *g
>
> describe your mail spamassassin server setup ( cause there are
> thousend ways which it might be implemented at your side ), then you
> might get an answe
Hi,
How do I exclude a domain from a server-wide envoirment?
regards
If anyone has an example config for sendmail to use the backscatter rbl at
smtp time please send it. I take a beating from backscatterers.
I would think you could do this with a macro that checks "mail from" and
triggers an rbl check on the ip. Sounds simple but my cf skills are barely
above trial
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
e.g., suppose I get a lot of phish which contain text (not html)
like this:
Username:..
Password:..
I try what seemed intuitively easy:
body__PHISH1
Hi,
Before I try to roll my own, does anyone have a set of rules or a plugin
designed to detect all these webmail account phishes. You know -- the kind
that pretend to be a webmail administrator who informs the user his/her
webmail account is being upgraded or has exceeded quota or whatever ..
A
At 11:19 AM 3/26/2009, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, spamassas...@corwyn.net wrote:
(seems like a lot of our spam comes in for garbage users with user
names that are strings of numbers).
...your MTA should _not_ be accepting invalid recipient addresses
for delivery. Fix your MTA con
Is it possible to get spamassassin to score email addresses with 4
(or more) numeric digits in sequence in the user name?
(seems like a lot of our spam comes in for garbage users with user
names that are strings of numbers).
Thanks!
rick
Rick Steeves
http://www.sinister.net
&quo
Interesting, but, the domain I'm asking about isn't sinister.net :-)
My current guess is that when the mail processes into amavis, when
send from local <> local (all on the same server) the email comes
from localhost, triggers SA, localhost isn't in the SPF record, and
thus triggers the SPF_N
I have user mail being sent from my domain to my domain flagging as
spam. that's ok really. It's what's making it flag as spam that's
bugging me - SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.659 tagged_above=-999 required=4.3
tests=[DYN_RDNS_SHORT_HELO_HTML=0.287, HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE=0.001,
At 10:07 AM 3/9/2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Are you getting spam from hotmail/yahoo addresses?
All the time.
ad.jp
def_whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dont use both since its 2 diff scores, and only use the one that are needed
here is the spf
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=wii.com&submit=Go%21
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::S
I am running spamassassin with postfix via amavisd on a FreeBSD Intel box.
Email from Nintendo's Wii service is getting flagged as spam, despite me
entering it into the whitelist. This seems to be the case with other
unrelated entries that I have whitelisted as well.
I have entere
Hi
Can someone suggest a rule (or rules) which will count the number of
lines in the body of a mail message? Or alternatively, a rule which
will tell me if a message contains less than N lines in its body?
Suppose, for example, I am looking to penalize messages which contain
a specific url and co
Hi,
My inbox is flooded by some new spams. Any idea how do I block it?
http://202.42.86.77/1.eml
http://202.42.86.77/2.eml
Best regards
Eloise Carlton writes:
> Thank you for taking the time to report and share this information. We
> have initiated an investigative process on this report and during the
> investigative period we have downgraded the sender's accreditation
> level.
Thank you, Eloise. I greatly appreciate Habeas' re
Checking into this more I notice this happens on any forwarded email to
another system. Spamassassin refuses to check it.
Any Ideas?
Thanks,
Ken
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Were using sendmail and their feature mailertable fo
l not do a spamassassin check.
Our sendmail.mc looks like: (skipped the first part)
#
dnl # greylist settings
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist',
`S=local:/var/run/milter-greylist/greylist.sock')dnl
define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{verify},
I have the same problem here:
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
3 0.so-4-3-0.XT2.POR3.ALTER.NET (152.63
/local/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist_subject.cf
Silly question: are you sure that your WhiteListSubject plugin is even
working in the first place?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 with Postfix via amavisd on a
FreeBSD machine.
In the last few weeks, all of a sudden messages with the same 4 or 5
subject lines started coming through undetected for some reason.
So I decided to add patterns matching those to
/usr/local/share
Hallo Payne,
Op zondag 07 oktober 2007 schreef cpayne aan SpamAssassin:
cp> Sorry, just had my morning soda, ok what I wanted to say, I want
cp> the miss-spelled to add x number of points. Maybe .2 or .5 or 1.
cp> Then that way it will help with a lot these new spam emails that
first and spamassassin will considere it as spam !
the from address can be as easily faked as the to address. I have
seen on
this mailing list many reports from users whitelisting their own address
somehow and thus getting false positives.
What you are searching for, is whitelist_from_
first and spamassassin will considere it as spam !
Thank you for your help ...
Yves
Hi,
Will ImageInfo be able to detect and catch this picture spam soon?
http://dreams.741.com/spam.gif
Thanks
h SMTP id a20mr2782785waa.1187106414523;
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dw ( [220.255.72.245])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
m10sm10662529waf.2007.08.14.08.46.51
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:
Hi List,
Does anyone encounter this error and how do you fix it?
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line 67,
line 319.
Thanks
As a follow up. I found a Logger.pm on the system but it was not in the
"/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/" directory. I did find one in the
"/usr/share/perl5/Razor2" directory. I made copy of this Logger.pm file
and placed it in the "Mail/SpamAssassin/" directory
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
