On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:20 -0400, Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Ramprasad wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 08:12 -0400, Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> >> Ramprasad wrote:
> >>> Why not SPF ??
> >>Over two thirds of the email I receive that is UCE/Spam has an
> >> "SPF_PASS" associated with it fr
gt; List-Post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
>> List-Id:
>> Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=
>> Subject: Re: Earthlink emails
>> From: Ramprasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Ramprasad wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 08:12 -0400, Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
>> Ramprasad wrote:
>>> Why not SPF ??
>> Over two thirds of the email I receive that is UCE/Spam has an
>> "SPF_PASS" associated with it from SA. All SPF seems to do is make the
>> "stupid" spammers look more
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 08:12 -0400, Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Ramprasad wrote:
> >
> > Why not SPF ??
>
> Over two thirds of the email I receive that is UCE/Spam has an
> "SPF_PASS" associated with it from SA. All SPF seems to do is make the
> "stupid" spammers look more stupid. The c
Ramprasad wrote:
>
> Why not SPF ??
Over two thirds of the email I receive that is UCE/Spam has an
"SPF_PASS" associated with it from SA. All SPF seems to do is make the
"stupid" spammers look more stupid. The clever ones aren't affected.
> DK is a resource HOG. And I cant do that ea
"Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SPF can be a pain for a number of reasons that have been discussed
> endlessly. I suspect Dirtlink found them to be effectively useless.
>
> Why not try using domainkeys instead?
SPF and domainkeys protect different things and therefore serve
differen
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 11:05 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Apparently they have removed SPF records after publishing them once.
> > Thats a stupid idea IMHO. Today I am forced to TEMP FAIL earthlink ids
> > whenever there is a spam attack on my servers
>
> SPF can be a pain for a number of reasons
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 19:11 -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "Ramprasad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:28 -0700, jdow wrote:
> >> Before you blame Earthlink note that it has NOT gone through Earthlink
> >> servers.
> >>
> >> relay2.corp.good-sam.com is the receiving email server.
>
From: "Ramprasad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:28 -0700, jdow wrote:
Before you blame Earthlink note that it has NOT gone through Earthlink
servers.
relay2.corp.good-sam.com is the receiving email server.
It's a forged email, at a guess. (It also has mangled headers. Newlines
Apparently they have removed SPF records after publishing them once.
Thats a stupid idea IMHO. Today I am forced to TEMP FAIL earthlink ids
whenever there is a spam attack on my servers
SPF can be a pain for a number of reasons that have been discussed
endlessly. I suspect Dirtlink found them
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:28 -0700, jdow wrote:
> Before you blame Earthlink note that it has NOT gone through Earthlink
> servers.
>
> relay2.corp.good-sam.com is the receiving email server.
>
> It's a forged email, at a guess. (It also has mangled headers. Newlines
> are missing. MAYBE it would
ity:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 20:17
Subject: Re: Earthlink emails
Received: from SHERI-PTIN5DJM8 (cpe-74-71-30-143.twcny.res.rr.com
[74.71.30.1
angle things.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "bryan haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 09:24
Subject: Earthlink emails
I am getting a lot of earthlink.net emails with 4-5 random words in the body. I am at a
lost how to prevent t
ginal Message -
From:
bryan haase
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 9:24
AM
Subject: Earthlink emails
I am getting a
lot of earthlink.net emails with 4-5 random words in the body. I am at a
On Tue, September 26, 2006 18:44, Gino Cerullo wrote:
>> update to 3.1.5 if posible
>> and enable spf check
> How does this help? Earthlink does not publish SPF records.
sorry i was to fast here :/
--
"This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
On 26-Sep-06, at 12:43 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, September 26, 2006 18:24, bryan haase wrote:
I am getting a lot of earthlink.net emails with 4-5 random words
in the body. I am at a
lost how to prevent these. Any suggestions??
http://openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=earthlink.net
On Tue, September 26, 2006 18:24, bryan haase wrote:
> I am getting a lot of earthlink.net emails with 4-5 random words in the body.
> I am at a
> lost how to prevent these. Any suggestions??
http://openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=earthlink.net
> SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on relay2.corp.
bryan haase wrote:
I am getting a lot of earthlink.net emails with 4-5 random words in the
body. I am at a lost how to prevent these. Any suggestions??
Thanks
Bryan
Subject:
axiom closure advocacy
may I suggest you start with upgrading your SA to 3.1.5 which will solve
security issues
I am getting a lot of earthlink.net emails with 4-5 random words in the body. I am at a lost how to prevent these. Any suggestions??
Thanks
Bryan
Subject: axiom closure advocacy
From: Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:17:02 -0500
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[E
19 matches
Mail list logo
