Re: HTML Validator

2006-11-27 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, March 10, 2006 5:08 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know of a good validator that can be run over a MIME part to report on the quality of the HTML? This might be used as a go/no-go filter at milter level, or it could be used as an SA plugin to assign a

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-16 Thread Philip Prindeville
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:58:52PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Ok, does anyone have *recent* statistical analysis (i.e. not almost a year old) on this? It could be that the people using this boneheaded construct have realized the error of their ways, and stopped

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:50:34PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Hmm. Thanks. Trying out the attachment, but having issues. Using 3.1.0 on FC3 Linux. Updated the bug. In general, it's bad to have the same conversation in multiple locations. I'd prefer to discuss issues with the plugin

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-15 Thread Philip Prindeville
Kenneth Porter wrote: On Friday, March 10, 2006 9:43 PM -0700 Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean: http://validator.w3.org/source/ I thought that was just a web form-based validator. I'll have to look at it to see if the validator can be run over an attachment

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:13:48PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser that could call various rules to check things, like the case of: Well, you wouldn't call various rules, you'd look for a behavior while parsing and flag it for

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-15 Thread Craig Morrison
Philip Prindeville wrote: I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser that could call various rules to check things, like the case of: a href=http://www.foo.com/xyzzy;http://www.bar.com/aardvark/a where the link disagrees with the text between the anchor tags (yeah, you

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-15 Thread Philip Prindeville
Craig Morrison wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote: I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser that could call various rules to check things, like the case of: a href=http://www.foo.com/xyzzy;http://www.bar.com/aardvark/a where the link disagrees with the text between the

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:40:51PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Does anyone have a way of doing a statistical analysis of ham that contains http(s?):// as the beginning of the anchor text? So for the second time today: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 --

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-15 Thread Philip Prindeville
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:40:51PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Does anyone have a way of doing a statistical analysis of ham that contains http(s?):// as the beginning of the anchor text? So for the second time today:

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-11 Thread Eric W. Bates
Kenneth Porter wrote: On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:46 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Makes me wonder about installing outbound filters that run a validator and reject anything that fails. I often see flame wars on mailing lists about allowing HTML posts to the list, but

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-11 Thread Philip Prindeville
Eric W. Bates wrote: I have never used it in a mail context; but tidy (from our friends at w3 http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/) is a very nice validator. Might be too big a load for SA, tho. I think you will also find that M$ html output from OE is probably full of errors anyway... All

HTML Validator (was: Interesting Phishing Trick)

2006-03-10 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:46 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Makes me wonder about installing outbound filters that run a validator and reject anything that fails. I often see flame wars on mailing lists about allowing HTML posts to the list, but I wonder how the

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-10 Thread Philip Prindeville
Kenneth Porter wrote: Anyone know of a good validator that can be run over a MIME part to report on the quality of the HTML? This might be used as a go/no-go filter at milter level, or it could be used as an SA plugin to assign a variable score based on the quality of the HTML. For

Re: HTML Validator

2006-03-10 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Friday, March 10, 2006 9:43 PM -0700 Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean: http://validator.w3.org/source/ I thought that was just a web form-based validator. I'll have to look at it to see if the validator can be run over an attachment (ie. an HTML MIME part) from a