--On Friday, March 10, 2006 5:08 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know of a good validator that can be run over a MIME part to
report on the quality of the HTML? This might be used as a go/no-go
filter at milter level, or it could be used as an SA plugin to assign a
var
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:50:34PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Hmm. Thanks. Trying out the attachment, but having issues. Using 3.1.0
> on FC3 Linux.
>
> Updated the bug.
In general, it's bad to have the same conversation in multiple locations.
I'd prefer to discuss issues with the plug
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:58:52PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>Ok, does anyone have *recent* statistical analysis (i.e. not almost a
>>year old)
>>on this? It could be that the people using this "boneheaded" construct have
>>realized the error of their ways, a
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:58:52PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Ok, does anyone have *recent* statistical analysis (i.e. not almost a
> year old)
> on this? It could be that the people using this "boneheaded" construct have
> realized the error of their ways, and stopped doing it.
Unfortuna
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:40:51PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>Does anyone have a way of doing a statistical analysis of ham that contains
>>http(s?):// as the beginning of the anchor text?
>>
>>
>
>So for the second time today:
>
>http://issues.apache.org/
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:40:51PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Does anyone have a way of doing a statistical analysis of ham that contains
> http(s?):// as the beginning of the anchor text?
So for the second time today:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4255
--
Random
Craig Morrison wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser
>>that could call various rules to check things, like the case of:
>>
>>http://www.foo.com/xyzzy";>http://www.bar.com/aardvark
>>
>>where the link disagrees with the text betw
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser
that could call various rules to check things, like the case of:
http://www.foo.com/xyzzy";>http://www.bar.com/aardvark
where the link disagrees with the text between the anchor tags (yeah, you
could lim
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:13:48PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I'm wondering what would be involved in putting in an HTML parser
> that could call various rules to check things, like the case of:
Well, you wouldn't "call various rules", you'd look for a behavior while
parsing and flag it fo
Kenneth Porter wrote:
>On Friday, March 10, 2006 9:43 PM -0700 Philip Prindeville
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Do you mean:
>>
>>http://validator.w3.org/source/
>>
>>
>
>I thought that was just a web form-based validator. I'll have to look at it
>to see if the validator can be run o
Eric W. Bates wrote:
> I have never used it in a mail context; but tidy (from our friends at w3
> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/) is a very nice validator. Might
> be too big a load for SA, tho. I think you will also find that M$ html
> output from OE is probably full of errors anyway...
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:46 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Makes me wonder about installing outbound filters that run a validator
>> and reject anything that fails. I often see flame wars on mailing lists
>> about allowing HTML posts to the
On Friday, March 10, 2006 9:43 PM -0700 Philip Prindeville
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you mean:
http://validator.w3.org/source/
I thought that was just a web form-based validator. I'll have to look at it
to see if the validator can be run over an attachment (ie. an HTML MIME
part) from
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Anyone know of a good validator that can be run over a MIME part to report
> on the quality of the HTML? This might be used as a go/no-go filter at
> milter level, or it could be used as an SA plugin to assign a variable
> score based on the quality of the HTML.
>
> For
On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:46 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Makes me wonder about installing outbound filters that run a validator
and reject anything that fails. I often see flame wars on mailing lists
about allowing HTML posts to the list, but I wonder how the argumen
15 matches
Mail list logo
