I have searched around rulesemporium without much success trying to find
these LOCAL_OBFU_* rules. I don't suppose you could tell me the
filename that they occur in could you? (I assume they will be in
/etc/mail/Spamassassin or wherever your local.cf file is for your
install).
Sorry, for
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 8:15:12 AM, Darren Coleman wrote:
Figured out why URIBL_SBL wasn't firing for me for that email - I can't
even resolve that domain! Have tried resolving it on several machines I
have shell access to (including external machines who peer with
different
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 4:57:57 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 8:15:12 AM, Darren Coleman wrote:
Figured out why URIBL_SBL wasn't firing for me for that email - I can't
even resolve that domain! Have tried resolving it on several machines I
have shell access to
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 January 2005 01:07
To: Jeff Chan
Cc: Darren Coleman; Jack L. Stone; Loren Wilton;
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of
RulesEmp
rules
On Wednesday,
On Thursday, January 13, 2005, 1:19:58 AM, Darren Coleman wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
% dig 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a
; DiG 8.3 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:
Well, just for grins I ran it here:
Content analysis details: (11.3 points, 4.6 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
2.6 LOCAL_OBFU_TADALAFIL_SUBJ Obfuscated 'TADALAFIL' in subject
0.3 SARE_WEOFFER
Loren Wilton wrote:
Well, just for grins I ran it here:
Content analysis details: (11.3 points, 4.6 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
2.6 LOCAL_OBFU_TADALAFIL_SUBJ Obfuscated 'TADALAFIL' in subject
Hi Loren,
Firstly, thanks for your help.
I have searched around rulesemporium without much success trying to find
these LOCAL_OBFU_* rules. I don't suppose you could tell me the
filename that they occur in could you? (I assume they will be in
/etc/mail/Spamassassin or wherever your local.cf
At 04:36 AM 1.12.2005 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
Well, just for grins I ran it here:
Content analysis details: (11.3 points, 4.6 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
2.6 LOCAL_OBFU_TADALAFIL_SUBJ
Hmm..
I got the following on that message (having reconfigured SURBL):
Content analysis details: (8.0 points, 5.0 required)
0.3 RM_hm_EmtyMsgidMessage ID is empty, or just spaces -
probable spamsign
0.3 SARE_WEOFFER BODY: Offers Something
2.5 MANGLED_CIALIS BODY:
-Original Message-
From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 January 2005 15:29
To: Jack L. Stone; Loren Wilton; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of
RulesEmp
rules
Hmm..
I got the following on that message
In my useage, SpamAssassin 3.0.2 works *way* better than the 2.XX versions
of
SpamAssassin. I've been training my Baysian filters, and they work really
well now.
SA 3.0.2 works so well that I've deleted most of my apx 400 local rules,
which plugged
leaks through SA 2.XX.
Chris Shaker
[EMAIL
Christopher John Shaker wrote:
In my useage, SpamAssassin 3.0.2 works *way* better than the 2.XX
versions of
SpamAssassin. I've been training my Baysian filters, and they work
really well now.
SA 3.0.2 works so well that I've deleted most of my apx 400 local rules,
which plugged
leaks through
Darren Coleman wrote:
Hi Loren,
Firstly, thanks for your help.
I have searched around rulesemporium without much success trying to find
these LOCAL_OBFU_* rules. I don't suppose you could tell me the
filename that they occur in could you? (I assume they will be in
/etc/mail/Spamassassin or
14 matches
Mail list logo
