Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread Royce Williams
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Dan Schaefer wrote: >> >> I'll have to repeat, for the original poster this isn't a technology >> vs technology argument.  If it was, his coworkers would be listing >> specific things Exchange does that FreeBSD/SA does not do. > > (Standing ovation on both emails)

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread mouss
Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit : > --On Monday, October 05, 2009 11:50 PM +0200 mouss > wrote: > >> Thomas Mullins a écrit : >>> We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my >>> coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained >>> enough that my boss is goi

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, > It's a shame that, living in Denver, I will be *just* out of range of > hearing the screams as the mailspools fill with viruses, malware, and > massive payloads of Spanish Prinsoner spams. Awe, c'mon now. Yes, I agree SA is a better solution, but Microsoft didn't get to be a multi-billion-d

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread Gary Smith
> (Standing ovation on both emails) > > -- > Dan Schaefer > Web Developer/Systems Analyst > Performance Administration Corp. I feel beat down now :( j/k

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread R-Elists
> I have no explanation, > > Their supposed complaint is, they don't know *nix. But my > coworker and I manage those boxes, so even if one of us left, > there would be at least one person to run those boxes. > > SA/ClamAV has been working great. Our BSD box sits in front > of the Exchan

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- "Quanah Gibson-Mount" wrote: | --On Monday, October 05, 2009 11:50 PM +0200 mouss | | wrote: | | > Thomas Mullins a écrit : | >> We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, | my | >> coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained | >> enough tha

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread LuKreme
On 5-Oct-2009, at 16:58, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: It's just like the people who believe in Apple. They will go spend $1K on an iMac and accessories and get -exactly- the same thing that I can build with FreeBSD and a whitebox clone for a quarter of the cost - but will never believe that they ove

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread LuKreme
On 5-Oct-2009, at 14:49, Thomas Mullins wrote: I will pull out our BSD box, and I will let them connect the Exchange box straight to the Net. It's a shame that, living in Denver, I will be *just* out of range of hearing the screams as the mailspools fill with viruses, malware, and massive

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-06 Thread Dan Schaefer
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Gary Smith wrote: Let them have as much Windows stuff as they want. Just plead the case to supplement. I'll have to repeat, for the original poster this isn't a technology vs technology argument. If it was, his coworkers would be listing specific things Exchange do

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread ram
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 15:05 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Monday, October 05, 2009 11:50 PM +0200 mouss > wrote: > > > Thomas Mullins a écrit : > >> We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my > >> coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally comp

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
On tir 06 okt 2009 00:05:52 CEST, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote And once exchange falls over, show them Zimbra. ;) Which uses postfix/SA/amavis, etc, and looks a lot like exchange... only better. ;) if zimbra was good i would not have choiced horde -- xpoint

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Gary Smith wrote: Let them have as much Windows stuff as they want. Just plead the case to supplement. I'll have to repeat, for the original poster this isn't a technology vs technology argument. If it was, his coworkers would be listing specific things Exchange does that FreeBSD/SA does no

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Gary Smith
> and the problem is? > > if they want exchange, give them exchange. don't fight (directly), > watch > instead. take pleasure of the situation, get fun as you can. I > personally took fun all day long in windows-only (and believe it or > not, > in linux-only) environments. > > > that said, you c

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 05.10.2009 at 14:11:46 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Thomas Mullins wrote: >> I will pull out our BSD box, and I will let them connect the Exchange >> box straight to the Net. > Second bet: how long it takes after doing that before the box is 0wned. I wouldn't ho

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 05, 2009 11:50 PM +0200 mouss wrote: Thomas Mullins a écrit : We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable FreeBSD/Spamassassin

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread mouss
Thomas Mullins a écrit : > We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my > coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained > enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable > FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They are planning on purchasing something > tha

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Shane (Or Thomas) This isn't a debate about Open Source vs commercial software as much as you would like to think that it is. This is a debate about something that your familiar with (FreeBSD/Spamassassin) and that none of your coworkers are familiar with, vs something that your coworkers are

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Thomas Mullins
Not my box, I am on the network side of things Shane From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org] Sent: Mon 10/5/2009 5:11 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Cc: Toni Mueller Subject: RE: OT bad news On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Thomas Mullins wrote: >

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:49 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: > Their supposed complaint is, they don't know *nix. > Poor babies. Why doesn't your boss give 'em each a copy of 'Linux in a Nutshell' (or the BSD equivalent) and a week to read it? If they're competent that should be enough for them to get

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:49 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: > I have no explanation, > I will pull out our BSD box, and I will let them connect the Exchange > box straight to the Net. They probably just want to connect their iPhones to the exchange server with Active-Sync, and couldn't be bothered

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Thomas Mullins wrote: I will pull out our BSD box, and I will let them connect the Exchange box straight to the Net. Second bet: how long it takes after doing that before the box is 0wned. Of course, if you admin that box too, that bet might be shooting yourself in the fo

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Thomas Mullins
assas...@oeko.net] Sent: Mon 10/5/2009 4:13 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: OT bad news Hi, On Mon, 05.10.2009 at 15:42:04 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: > We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my > coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they h

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Jefferson Davis
k12 is kindergarten through 12th grade in US schools... - Message from guent...@rudersport.de - Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:33:26 +0200 From: Karsten Bräckelmann Subject: Re: OT bad news To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:13 -0700, Jeffer

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:23 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > I guess the comfort of the illusion of having somebody to sue is a strong > attraction. Now there's one argument to start smoking... (SCNR, and it's probably the cold speaking anyway. ;) -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 22:33 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Since we're off-topic anyway -- I take this response, and the mention of > "school district" earlier in this thread, that this indeed is just a > strange coincidence and infrastructural independent states. > > Now, if someone could br

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:13 -0700, Jefferson Davis wrote: > There are some that still don't get the value of opensource... Go > figure. [...] > We just don't experience the pain that some of my exchange-using > collegues do... Since we're off-topic anyway -- I take this response, and the mention

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 22:00 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 15:42 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: > > We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my > > coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained > > enough that my boss is going

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Jefferson Davis wrote: There are some that still don't get the value of opensource... Go figure. My employer has contracts that specify "no open source". I guess the comfort of the illusion of having somebody to sue is a strong attraction. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Thomas Mullins wrote: We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They are planning on purchasing s

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 05.10.2009 at 15:42:04 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: > We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my > coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained > enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable > FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. more

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 10/5/2009 9:42 PM, Thomas Mullins wrote: We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They are planning on purchasing so

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Jefferson Davis
on, 05 Oct 2009 22:00:08 +0200 From: Karsten Bräckelmann Subject: Re: OT bad news To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 15:42 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: >> We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my >> coworkers do not

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 15:42 -0400, Thomas Mullins wrote: > We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my > coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained > enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable > FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They are planni

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Kurt Buff
Heh. If you want, try to convince them to use ASSP: http://assp.sourceforge.net/ It's open source too, but it does run on an Exchange box, from what I've heard, and I've only ever heard good things about it. I must say, I'm surprised, given the state of the economy, that they've made this decis

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years > now. But, my coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they > have finally complained enough that my boss is going to > replace our reliable FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They > are planning on purchasing something that runs ON > Exchange. Wh

RE: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Peter P. Benac
Glad I don't live in Virginia!! I hate to see my tax dollars wasted because people don't understand OpenSource.. Especially in these troubled times. From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 15:42 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: OT bad ne

Re: OT bad news

2009-10-05 Thread Dan Schaefer
Thomas Mullins wrote: We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But, my coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have finally complained enough that my boss is going to replace our reliable FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They are planning on purchasing something that runs