Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of January 13, 2007 7:17:46 AM -0500, Dave Koontz is alleged to
> have said:
>
>> Just a wild stab here, run a lint check on all your rules. I once fat
>> fingered a rule in my local.cf file and got similar hit results as
>> you are
>> describing here.
>
> --As for the r
--As of January 13, 2007 7:17:46 AM -0500, Dave Koontz is alleged to have
said:
Just a wild stab here, run a lint check on all your rules. I once fat
fingered a rule in my local.cf file and got similar hit results as you are
describing here.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
I fixed a couple o
-Spamassassin
Subject: Re: Rules always triggering.
--As of January 12, 2007 7:08:18 PM -0600, Shane Williams is alleged to have
said:
>> System is Darwin, running Postfix. The sign-up message for this list
>> got those rules triggered. (_Everything_ triggers them.)
>
> This is just
--As of January 12, 2007 7:08:18 PM -0600, Shane Williams is alleged to
have said:
System is Darwin, running Postfix. The sign-up message for this list got
those rules triggered. (_Everything_ triggers them.)
This is just a guess, but is it possible that OS X's use of carriage
returns is ma
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Fri, January 12, 2007 2:34 pm, Theo Van Dinter said:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is,
for ever
--As of January 12, 2007 12:40:00 PM -0800, John D. Hardin is alleged to
have said:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
I am scanning mail via a procmail recipe
Anything in that configuration that you can think of that would
mess up those headers? I can post a set if you would like.
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> I am scanning mail via a procmail recipe
>
> Anything in that configuration that you can think of that would
> mess up those headers? I can post a set if you would like.
There are procmail flags that allow passing only the message body text
to the
On Fri, January 12, 2007 2:34 pm, Theo Van Dinter said:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
>> Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
>> 'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is,
>> for every single message that comes through my
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
> 'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is, for
> every single message that comes through my system, regardless of anything
> else.) I've set them to sco
