On Sunday 09 April 2006 15:20, mouss wrote:
> No. white and black aren't colors. they are absence of colour:)
Well... according to physics... it really depends on what
is delivering the pigments...
When you paint.. and you combine a bunch of colors.. the colors
get darker and darker.. to the po
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:12:25PM -0700, Ask List wrote:
>linux and unix is unix. So I would like to hear users experiences using
>different operating systems. Pros/Cons/Problems/Headaches/etc. The
>operating systems I'm most interested in are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo,
>Slackware, F
8 mail servers on Solaris 10 Sparc
+custom compiled sendmail
+clamAV
This has been a stable combination for several years for me.
Ask List wrote:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing
Robert G. Werner wrote:
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
[snip]
Now, not to start a thing about real colors, but red ...
[snip]
I've heard that black is the new black (maybe the old one too).
No. white and black aren't colors. they are absence of colour:)
This reminds me of a story.
WARNING. This ma
I use Linux, slackware 10.1 to be more specific. I use it for two reasons.
1. Its stable, secure and probably the most like UNIX( but free ).
2. It acts as a mailbag and buffer for my internal exchange servers.
I have two companies setup in this configuration and haven't had any
problems. I ca
My opintion is Fedora Core 5 running on Dual Core Athlon 64 bit OS. The
dual core athlons are screaming fast but you need a newer Linux kernel
to run on it.
> From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
>
> (hmmm... top-posting)
>
> In truth, nothing I've read in this thr
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
[snip]
Now, not to start a thing about real colors, but red ...
[snip]
I've heard that black is the new black (maybe the old one too).
--
Robert G. Werner (Network Systems Administrator)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
559.244.3734
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and beg
On Friday April 07 2006 4:57 pm, mouss wrote:
> Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> >> Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
> >>
> >> You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
> >> public; r
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
You forgot editors. No, wai
2:23 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
>
> (hmmm... top-posting)
>
> In truth, nothing I've read in this thread has seemed inciteful; not
> inflamatory at all. I think we all understand the passion we hold for
th
which you never ever talk about in
> public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ryan Kather [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:24 AM
> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Wh
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
>
> You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
> public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
You forgot editors. No, wait, that is a relig
2006 11:24 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
>
> > We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
to
> run
> > spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the
mailing
>
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
> spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
> so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different
> opinion on the subject and some will have none at all, linux is lin
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:47:01 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
> > Ask List gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
> > spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
> > s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> The question is does FreeBSD make binary package updates, or are security
>> updates source-patch only.
>
>From what I've observed, the base OS updates are source-patch only, at least
>until the next full FreeBSD release. A
Interesting answers.
I'm using Solaris 10/X86. Sun Java Enterprise Messaging Server.
Integration is built in. easy to set up. Dead stable, but,then I
work for Sun.
jay
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Ask List wrote:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
t
On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Ask List wrote:
I want to continue to run FreeBSD in production. However we are
currently
running nagios on freebsd and weve ran into a problem, we believe
its the same
issue as described at this link:
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/whatsnew.html . Since
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Ask List wrote:
I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not running
a RedHat
based distribution
I use FreeBSD exclusively on servers. But the best advice given here
is use what you are familiar with administering.
From: "Ask List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different
opinion on the subject and some will
Gary D. Margiotta wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were just rebooted for kernel
I can't say I'm a huge fan of Debian, but it is still my number one choice.
The biggest plus is the apt package system and the ability to mix 'stable',
'testing' and 'unstable' packages. You can leave the heart of the system
with tried and true (and constantly debugged) older stable packages and
l 06, 2006 12:54 PM
> > To: users spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
> >
> > Ask List gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >
> > I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not running a
> > RedHa
"Ask List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 04/06/2006 02:12:25 PM:
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to
> the mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone
> will have a different
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 21:12 Ask List wrote:
> The operating systems
> I'm most interested in are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware,
Those are all Linux, use what you like or know best.
> FreeBSDs, and OpenSolaris.
I've heard FreeBSD should be secure, OpenSolaris I don't know at all.
Gene
The question is does FreeBSD make binary package updates, or are security
updates source-patch only.
From what I've observed, the base OS updates are source-patch only, at least
until the next full FreeBSD release. Anything that's in the ports tree
should be available as either a source update
Eric W. Bates wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Ask List wrote:
>>
>> FreeBSD - Never used it. Seems quite server ready, although I'm not sure if
>> they
>> do binary package updates, or only source-patches (like OpenBSD does).
>
> FreeBSD house for many years.
>
> Yes, you can install precompiled
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
>
> FreeBSD - Never used it. Seems quite server ready, although I'm not sure if
> they
> do binary package updates, or only source-patches (like OpenBSD does).
FreeBSD house for many years.
Yes, you can install precompiled binaries if you prefer. However,
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were just rebooted for kernel updates and the like.
The ports tree is exce
> I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not running a RedHat
> based distribution
Our entire servers farm is FreeBSD-based. No complaints there, rock solid.
The ports-based critical components like SA, ClamAV, Postfix, amavisd-new
are very responsive and gives confidence that such
Ask List wrote:
> Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
>> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
> spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so
> we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different opinion
> on
> th
Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
>
> Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not running a
> RedHat
> based distribution
>
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 19:54 + schrieb Ask List:
> Ask List gmail.com> writes:
> Pros/Cons/Problems/Headaches/etc. The operating systems I'm most interested in
> are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware, FreeBSDs, and OpenSolaris.
> >
> I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. An
Ask List wrote:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different
opinion on the subject and some will have none at all, li
My "personal" server runs FreeBSD along with Sendmail, procmail, and
Courier-IMAP. My employer's servers run Redhat Enterprise Linux along with
Sendmail, procmail, and Courier-IMAP. I'm much more comfortable with
FreeBSD, which is why I continue to use it on my own system. At work, we got
roped
Ask List wrote:
Ask List gmail.com> writes:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so
we can have other opinions.
I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not runn
We use OpenBSD. Works for us. Have absolutely no complaints.
Shane
From: news on behalf of Ask List
Sent: Thu 4/6/2006 3:54 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so
we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different opinion on
the subject and some will hav
CentOS all the way for Servers
Jason
--
Jason L. Esman
VentureNet
1.866.863.8375
205.978.9230 x234
echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D4D465452snlb xq |dc
> -Original Message-
> From: Ask List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
On Thursday April 06 2006 3:31 pm, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
> > We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> > to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the
> > mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will
> > hav
Ask List wrote:
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the
> mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will
> have a different opinion on the subject and some will have none at
>
I think this was covered in the archives
last year. My opinion is use the one that you are most comfortable with. I
personally use RedHat Enterprise, not because it better than the rest because
that’s what I know.
I think that most of the headaches happen
around the MTA/MTU’s rather t
44 matches
Mail list logo