RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread Chris Santerre
- From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: RE: scan times up! -Original Message- From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread Chris Santerre
-Original Message- From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: RE: scan times up! On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote: If anyone remembers this thread, I have more feedback. After

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread scohen
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message- From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: RE: scan times up! I haven't been reading this list for a couple of weeks

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread Gary Smith
: scan times up! -Original Message- From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: RE: scan times up! On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote: If anyone remembers this thread, I have more

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread Andy Jezierski
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2004 03:48:57 PM: Good grief NO! You read this wrong. I'm running it on a system that archeologists are interested in! I think the Boston Computer museum left me a message wanting to take the system away! Hell I'm running on a system that

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread Morris Jones
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, scohen wrote: Thanks for the reply. So what's with the SA eats all my memory thread and the memory footprint thread? Those two threads and your Scan times up thread makes it seem that there are problems. I think there's a problem with spamd and memory use, and we've

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-05 Thread Ken Goods
Andy Jezierski scribbled on Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:31 PM: There's never anything wrong with going on an archeological dig in the computer room. I'm sometimes asked What's that relic in the corner? Does it actually have a hard drive? and people are amazed when I tell them That's what's

Re: scan times up!

2004-10-01 Thread Ryan Thompson
Chris Santerre wrote to Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail): Well... ver avg scan time 2.4x2.7 seconds 3.0 30.4 seconds OH MY! Network test :) Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;) :-) Others have pointed out some possible causes. I did fairly extensive testing

Re: scan times up!

2004-10-01 Thread Nick Leverton
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: Well... ver avg scan time 2.4x 2.7 seconds 3.0 30.4 seconds OH MY! Network test :) Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;) Have you got a local (on-site, preferably on-machine) DNS cache ?

RE: scan times up!

2004-10-01 Thread Gary Smith
: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: RE: scan times up! -Original Message- From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: scan times up! On Thu

RE: scan times up!

2004-09-30 Thread Chris Santerre
-Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:23 PM To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: scan times up! At 05:10 PM 9/30/2004, Chris Santerre wrote: Well... ver avg scan time 2.4x2.7 seconds 3.0

Re: scan times up!

2004-09-30 Thread Ryan Moore
Chris Santerre wrote: Well... ver avg scan time 2.4x2.7 seconds 3.0 30.4 seconds OH MY! Network test :) Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;) My time is up a little since upgrading, but not that much. I also upgraded the hardware on the machine though too,