On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
In my setup this is not an option, because I run SA as a milter, via
spamass-milter. If every process has to die after the scan, it cannot
pass the results of the scan to Sendmail (at least, this is what
happened after I tried this option, so I kept on
In my setup this is not an option, because I run SA as a milter, via
spamass-milter. If every process has to die after the scan, it cannot
pass the results of the scan to Sendmail (at least, this is what
happened after I tried this option, so I kept on receiving messages
like this:
Oct 4
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Morris Jones wrote:
I found 3.0 pushing my machine into swapping as well this afternoon -- a
first for me. I stopped and restarted my smtp server and spamd, and it's
back to normal for now.
I'm beginning to think I might be better off running spamassassin in
unique processes
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Luis Hernan Otegui wrote:
Well, a weekend update:
Nothing has changed here. I removed EVERYTHING (except for local.cf)
from /etc/mail/spamassassin, and still it chews as much memory as it
could get. I limited the number of childs to
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Luis Hernan Otegui wrote:
Well, a weekend update:
Nothing has changed here. I removed EVERYTHING (except for local.cf)
from /etc/mail/spamassassin, and still it chews as much memory as it
could get. I limited the number of
Is there a Perl equivalent to the Unix 'setrlimit' or 'ulimit'
function? (IE something to set the max data size that a process
is allowed to use).
I use djb's softlimit and supervise my spamd process with daemontools.
I softlimit spamd at 100MB just to prevent childs from running away with
I had this problem till I set the max per child option to = 1
This caused spamd to kill the process used to scan every msg once it's
done.
Not the best answer I know but it keeps it in check
Loren Wilton wrote:
80M doesn't strike me as unusual for spamd if you have any of the addon
rulesets.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#sputter...! Yes, that is too unusual unless you're using
ALL the addon rulesets, including BigEvil, which, I hear, eats pets and
small children when nobody's looking, and
Hence my comments on the OT thread earlier today about the BigEvil
author going mad one day... :)
-Original Message-
From: snowjack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 4:20 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory
I found 3.0 pushing my machine into swapping as well this afternoon -- a
first for me. I stopped and restarted my smtp server and spamd, and it's
back to normal for now.
I'm beginning to think I might be better off running spamassassin in
unique processes instead of as a daemon. The load time
I have a similar situation, and I have removed all my rule sets. Here is
the output from top
top - 00:35:45 up 1 day, 14:45, 2 users, load average: 2.45, 2.40, 2.48
Tasks: 158 total, 3 running, 154 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.0% us, 1.6% sy, 97.4% ni, 0.0% id, 0.0% wa,
Well, I've migrated from 2.64 to 3.0, following all the hints in the
UPDATE file, and the ones given here, in the list. But still I'm
concerned about some messages I get when I run spamassassin --lint,
and because one of my servers, a Pentium III at 900 MHz with 512 MB of
RAM, cannot handle 20
Well, I can't solve *all* of your problems, but I can help with one of them:
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
I'm having 51 issues when I run spamassassin
--lint. I've clean the obsolete options from local.cf, but the rest of
the issues come (apparently) from badly defined rules in the local.cf
file, but
At 07:29 PM 9/30/2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
warning: rule 'VIRUS_WARNING_MYDOOM_BNCE' is over 22 chars
lint: 51 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more
information.
I have an antivirus running as a milter, how do I disable the virus
tests in SA, and also, why do I have
ok, the virus warning issues have been solved, but NOT the fact that I
have 22 copies of spamd running at the same time, even when I´ve
limited the number of max children of Sendmail to 20, and each copy of
spamd weights 21 MB! How can I limit the amount of memory spamd is
chewing?
On Thu, 30
Just a little update, this is what's going on over the server:
11:59am up 16:12, 1 user, load average: 10,51, 5,30, 2,47
151 processes: 144 sleeping, 6 running, 1 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 6,5% user, 2,1% system, 0,0% nice, 91,3% idle
Mem: 449484K av, 76K used,5008K free,
]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:00 AM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
Just a little update, this is what's going on over the server:
11:59am up 16:12, 1 user, load average: 10,51, 5,30, 2,47
151 processes: 144 sleeping, 6
should be that large!!
--Chris
-Original Message-
From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:00 AM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
Just a little update
AM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
ok, all I had in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir was my local.cf and
the init.pre. I've cleaned the local.cf according to the list of
obsolete rules and directives, and still
: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:52 AM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
ok, all I had in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir was my local.cf and
the init.pre. I've
Luis Hernán Otegui said:
ok, the virus warning issues have been solved, but NOT the fact that I
have 22 copies of spamd running at the same time, even when I´ve
limited the number of max children of Sendmail to 20, and each copy of
spamd weights 21 MB! How can I limit the amount of memory
At 12:23 PM 10/1/2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Additionally, I have to add that I still have one warning when I run
spamassassin --lint, and it seems to come from the standard ruleset:
warning: description for EXCUSE_ES_03 is over 50 chars
Ick. Bad form for a final release..
BigEvil what?
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:21:47 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BigEvil.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something is seriously wrong with your setup! Move all cf files except
local.cf out of the
/etc/mail/spamassassin dir
Just a little update, this is what's going on over the server:
11:59am up 16:12, 1 user, load average: 10,51, 5,30, 2,47
151 processes: 144 sleeping, 6 running, 1 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 6,5% user, 2,1% system, 0,0% nice, 91,3% idle
Mem: 449484K av, 76K used,5008K
24 matches
Mail list logo
