Re: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org

--On Sunday, March 14, 2021 1:23 PM +1000 Simon Wilson wrote: You've not stated your OS but on a RHEL/CentOS 7 box the correct way to remove is to go to /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d and delete sought.conf. RHEL bugzilla for the issue:

Re: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org

- Message from a...@onet.eu - Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:16:25 +0100 From: a...@onet.eu Subject: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Hi, I'm getting this from cron since two days: channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rule

Re: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org

Sought rules have been deprecated at least 5 years ago. you can remove that part of the config. h2h Axb On 3/12/21 1:16 PM, a...@onet.eu wrote: Hi, I'm getting this from cron since two days: channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org' record found, channel failed 11-Mar-2021 05:46:59: SpamAssas

sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org

Hi, I'm getting this from cron since two days: channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org' record found, channel failed 11-Mar-2021 05:46:59: SpamAssassin: Unknown error code 3 from sa-update ls /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/ sought_rules_yerp_org sought_rules_yerp_org.cf updates_spamassassin_org

Re: sa-update error - config: invalid expression for rule T_MIXED_ES (fwd)

On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:50, Kevin Walton wrote: Hi I am running: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 sa-update version svn917659 This is an unsupported obsolete version of SpamAssassin. If you are maintaining your own installation, you should update. If you are using a distribution maintained by someo

sa-update error - config: invalid expression for rule T_MIXED_ES (fwd)

Hi I am running: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 sa-update version svn917659 and I have been getting the following error for the last couple of days now when cron runs sa-update: " config: invalid expression for rule T_MIXED_ES: "( __LOWER_E > 20 ) && ( __E_LIKE_LETTER > ( (__LOWER_E * 14 ) / 1

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

On 01/30/2018 07:22 AM, David Jones wrote: On 01/30/2018 06:46 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, Just spotted by others, this diff fixes the problem: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540 Btw: what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release? from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/: Latest News

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

On 01/30/2018 06:46 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, Just spotted by others, this diff fixes the problem: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540 Btw: what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release? from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/: Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been r

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

On 1/30/2018 7:46 AM, Alex wrote: Now I see this check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers function was just added to the 3.4 branch in the last few days. Yes, whoever added the rule needs to be more careful.  Not saying names (or initials :-) ). Regards, KAM

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

Hi, >> Just spotted by others, >> this diff fixes the problem: >> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540 > >> Btw: >> what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release? >> >> from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/: >> Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released! >> >> I

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

Hi, > Just spotted by others, > this diff fixes the problem: > https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540 > Btw: > what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release? > > from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/: > Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released! > > I didn't not

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

Hello Giovanni, On 01/30/2018 12:55 PM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On 01/30/18 12:43, A. Schulze wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update: >> >> rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping: >> (Can't locate object method "chec

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

Giovanni Bechis: Just spotted by others, this diff fixes the problem: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540 yea! but that's a patch for the rules, right? may we expect a fixed ruleset will be published shortly? Andreas Btw: what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release? from

Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

On 01/30/18 12:43, A. Schulze wrote: > > Hello all, > > shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update: > > rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping: > (Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via > package "Mail::SpamAssassi

SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test"

Hello all, shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update: rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping: (Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1277) line 253. ) channel:

Re: sa-update error

On Tue, June 9, 2009 17:33, Bowie Bailey wrote: > I have a CentOS 5.3 system with everything installed from the repos and > my @INC looks exactly the same, so I don't necessarily see a problem > with the versions here. problem is that some users of yum, rpm, and friends forget to make reinstall o

Re: sa-update error

Benny Pedersen wrote: On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote: Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following: [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per l5/site_perl/5.

Re: sa-update error

On Tue, June 9, 2009 03:48, LuKreme wrote: > Second off, there is absolutely nothing wrong with using CPAN. OP problem is mix of CPAN and RPM, he dont need both to solve it CPAN is usefull if one makes RPM with it, but most belive its better just to follow guides and use CPAN shells, when distro

Re: sa-update error

On 8-Jun-2009, at 16:50, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Mon, June 8, 2009 15:26, The Doctor wrote: You can either use cpan or http://search.cpan.org . bad advise ! First off, it's 'advice' (the noun) in this case, not 'advise' (the verb). Second off, there is absolutely nothing wrong with usi

Re: sa-update error

On Tue, June 9, 2009 00:59, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:39 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> does there exists a perl-cleanup in you distro ? >> > There's not a general one. On the assumption (true for Fedora) that both > Perl and SA are distro supported packages, if I was tack

Re: sa-update error

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:39 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > does there exists a perl-cleanup in you distro ? > There's not a general one. On the assumption (true for Fedora) that both Perl and SA are distro supported packages, if I was tackling this I'd do the following: - make safety copies of SA

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, June 8, 2009 15:26, The Doctor wrote: > You can either use cpan or http://search.cpan.org . bad advise ! -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, June 8, 2009 15:04, snowweb wrote: > so I guess it's fixed. until next time there is a new perl version yes :/ newer mix CPAN with a RPM system ! -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote: > Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following: > > [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update > Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per > l5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/per

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:30, snowweb wrote: > > When I do "which perl" it only returns, > > "/usr/bin/perl" unsure if thats relayted > doesn't this mean that I only have one installed? (I'm not arguing.. just > trying to understand, since I'm new to Linux). spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint grep 5.8

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:27, snowweb wrote: > Sorry for my ignorance. I'm very new to Linux. Which missing perl module > is that please? there is non missing, you just have another perl version that miss it, how to resolve problem with 2 versions of perl with yum i dont know, but solve this and th

Re: sa-update error

On 08.06.09 06:04, snowweb wrote: > Guys, thanks to you all. You're all the most helpful people I've come across > online! > > I think Stefan-Michael Guenther fixed it when he emailed me and told me to > run this: > > perl -MCPAN -e shell > install Archive::Tar > > Now when I type "sa-update", a

Re: sa-update error

r use cpan or http://search.cpan.org . > pete > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23921654.html > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses an

Re: sa-update error

lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386 > -linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. > > Any ideas please?

Re: sa-update error

PERL5LIB set > somewhere > in startup/config files? > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923417.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update error

(linux) distribution do you have? > - do you have spamassassin installed from the distribution? > - do you have perl installed from the distribution? > - don't you have incorrectly set environment variable PERL5LIB set > somewhere > in startup/config files? > -- View this messa

Re: sa-update error

package is available via yum if you want an easy way > to keep it current. If not Install it via CPAN. You may need to > restart SA after, not sure. > > It may also be worth running "spamassassin --lint -D" to see if you > are missing any other packages. > > HTH > > Nigel > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923296.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update error

> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 03:30 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: > >> I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of > >> setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error > >> message when I ran it manually: > >> > >> [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-upd

Re: sa-update error

nly > does in 5.8.6 > > > -- > http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :) > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923139.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update error

h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; > }}} > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923079.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, June 8, 2009 12:55, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > It may also be worth running "spamassassin --lint -D" to see if you > are missing any other packages. you have currently 2 perl versions installed this is the problem, if not all modules exists in 5.8.8, but some only does in 5.8.6 -- http:

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:30:59 -0700 (PDT), snowweb wrote: > >I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of >setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message >when I ran it manually: > >[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update && service spamassassin res

Re: sa-update error

On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 03:30 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: > I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of > setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message > when I ran it manually: > > [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update && service spam

sa-update error

borted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. Any ideas please? pete -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23921654.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

SA update error

found where operator expected at (eval 108) line 10, near "} 1" (Missing operator before 1?) rules: failed to run header tests, skipping some: syntax error at (eval 108) line 6, at EOF Global symbol "$plugin" requires explicit package name at (eval 108) line 7. syntax error at (eval 108) line 11, near "; }" -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SA-update-error-tp16722774p16722774.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SA-update error

Dennis Clark wrote: Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran SA-update -D using the default channel of updates.spamassassin.org, received error "new version is 585884, skipped channel". What exactly is going wrong here. Has the sa update default channel been

RE: SA-update error

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2008 3:18 p.m. > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: SA-update error > > Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran > S

Re: SA-update error

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:18:02PM -0800, Dennis Clark wrote: > Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran > SA-update -D using the default channel of updates.spamassassin.org, received > error "new version is 585884, skipped channel". > > What exactly is going wro

SA-update error

Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran SA-update -D using the default channel of updates.spamassassin.org, received error "new version is 585884, skipped channel". What exactly is going wrong here. Has the sa update default channel been changed?

RE: sa-update error wrong gpg key...

Hey guys.. We're seeing the same thing.. although slightly different.. this error has only been happening for a week or so now.. everything's been fine before that.. it seems to be with the RSA key generated on 15Jan.. An sa-update -D shows : [/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin]# sa-update -D [5

Re: sa-update error wrong gpg key...

Steve Monkhouse wrote: > Hey guys.. > > We're seeing the same thing.. although slightly different.. Not really the same thing. In the OPs case he wasn't using the key for the channel. In your case, your (I assume) recently updated version of GPG refuses to use the non-cross-certified key. > t

Re: sa-update error wrong gpg key...

Justin Mason wrote: > Kevin -- I have bad news. ;) that's not coming from our channels, > it's the sare.sa-update.dostech.net channel I'd guess. Hey, why's that bad news! :) > Kevin W. Gagel writes: >> Thanks for looking into this. I've copied and pasted everything below so >> that you have a c

Re: sa-update error wrong gpg key...

Kevin -- I have bad news. ;) that's not coming from our channels, it's the sare.sa-update.dostech.net channel I'd guess. --j. Kevin W. Gagel writes: > - Original Message - > >hi Kevin -- what's the channel and command line? > > Hi Justin, > > Thanks for looking into this. I've copied

Re: Antwort: Re: sa-update error

; make: *** [test_dynamic] Fehler 11 > /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK > Running make install > make test had returned bad status, won't install without force > > > > > > "Philipp Snizek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 06.12.2007 14:07 > > An > [EMAIL

Antwort: Re: sa-update error

AIL PROTECTED] Kopie users@spamassassin.apache.org Thema Re: sa-update error > Hi > > can anyone help me with this? > I think its the archive::tar which makes problems, > so i installed a newer version, but the error remains... > > [23086] dbg: channel: populating temp content file &

Re: sa-update error

> Hi > > can anyone help me with this? > I think its the archive::tar which makes problems, > so i installed a newer version, but the error remains... > > [23086] dbg: channel: populating temp content file > [23086] dbg: channel: file verification passed, testing update > [23086] dbg: channel: extr

sa-update error

Hi can anyone help me with this? I think its the archive::tar which makes problems, so i installed a newer version, but the error remains... [23086] dbg: channel: populating temp content file [23086] dbg: channel: file verification passed, testing update [23086] dbg: channel: extracting archive

sa-update error, again!

Okay thx for the help with my sa-update problem yesterday. now i am a step further and get the next error .-) Here is the Dump, error is at the end [1722] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all [1722] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG [1722] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.2.3 [1722] dbg: co

Re: sa-update error

the files from my private machine .-) > > > > > Jürgen Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 04.12.2007 06:26 > > An > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Kopie > > Thema > [Fwd: Re: sa-update error] > > > > > > > > > > - Nachricht von "Dar

Re: sa-update error

tories and copied the files from my private machine .-) Jürgen Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04.12.2007 06:26 An [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie Thema [Fwd: Re: sa-update error] - Nachricht von "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> auf Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:14:32 -0

Re: sa-update error

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i get following error when i run sa-update. uery failed: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => answer section incomplete can anybody help me with this? here is the whole dump from sa-update: I'm getting the proper response from all five of our name servers. Try the query

sa-update error

Hi i get following error when i run sa-update. uery failed: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => answer section incomplete can anybody help me with this? here is the whole dump from sa-update: [31625] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all [31625] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG [31625] dbg: generic:

Re: sa-update error

Sg wrote: > Hi > > I am using SA 3.1.7. I want to update it. > > I tried this command > > sa-update --nogpg --channel updates.spamassassin.org > --channel saupdates.openprotect.com > > > But i got this error ""Argument "1.26_01"

sa-update error

Hi I am using SA 3.1.7. I want to update it. I tried this command sa-update --nogpg --channel updates.spamassassin.org --channel saupdates.openprotect.com But i got this error ""Argument "1.26_01" isnt numeric in subroutine entry at sa-update line 91"" -- Sg

Re: sa-update error

Hi Daryl, On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:56:02 -0400, "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd be glad for your suggestions re sa-update error. >> >> $ sa-update >> can't re

Re: sa-update error

Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hello, I'd be glad for your suggestions re sa-update error. $ sa-update can't resolve "l27.0.0.1" to address at L27.0.0.1 isn't quite the same as 127.0.0.1. Daryl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm lin

sa-update error

Hello, I'd be glad for your suggestions re sa-update error. $ sa-update can't resolve "l27.0.0.1" to address at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm line 751. I think the issue started when I switched from my ISP DNS server to using my own ca

Re: sa-update error:

he sa-update error. Thanks again Diptanjan ### Perhaps you haven't installed Archive::Tar (or IO::Zlib) as noted in the INSTALL doc. Daryl -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error%3A-tf3882174.html#a11005804 Sen

Re: sa-update error:

diptanjan wrote: Hi Friends, I have installed spamassassin few days back. using CPAN. I gave the following command # perl -MCPAN -e shell[as root] cpan>o conf prerequisites_policy ask cpan>install Mail::SpamAssassin cpan>quit spamassassin -V gives

sa-update error:

rl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81. Can someone help me what went wrong? ans how to solve this problem. TIA Diptanjan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error%3A-tf38821

Re: sa-update error

Jim Knuth wrote: Heute (13.04.2007/02:56 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, Jim Knuth wrote: Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, Jim Knuth wrote: Hello spamassassin-users, Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake # sa-update config: failed to parse line,

Re: sa-update error

Heute (13.04.2007/02:56 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, > Jim Knuth wrote: >> Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, >> >>> Jim Knuth wrote: Hello spamassassin-users, Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake # sa-update config: faile

Re: sa-update error

Jim Knuth wrote: Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, Jim Knuth wrote: Hello spamassassin-users, Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake # sa-update config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf": asn_lookup asn.rout

Re: sa-update error

Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, > Jim Knuth wrote: >> Hello spamassassin-users, >> >> Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake >> >> # sa-update >> config: failed to parse line, skipping, in >> "/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf": asn_lookup >> asn

Re: sa-update error

Jim Knuth wrote: Hello spamassassin-users, Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake # sa-update config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf": asn_lookup asn.routeviews.org _ASN_ _ASNCIDR_ channel: lint check of update failed, channel fail

sa-update error

Hello spamassassin-users, Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake # sa-update config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf": asn_lookup asn.routeviews.org _ASN_ _ASNCIDR_ channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed What is wrong?

Re: SA-Update error messages

On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:10, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > John Andersen wrote: > > Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these > > lines: > > Only from cron? Nope, not only from cron, also when manually run. Other machines with later versions of Perl do not do this s

Re: SA-Update error messages

John Andersen wrote: Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines: Only from cron? Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. Use of uninitialized value in

Re: SA-Update error messages

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:26:09PM -0800, John Andersen wrote: > > > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. > > > eval { use Net::DNS; }; > > Just curious, what version of perl are you using? > > 5.8.0 Interesting. I have no idea what would cause perl to gener

Re: SA-Update error messages

continuing with the pop-posting They are installed Simone. [1107] dbg: diag: module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.11 [1107] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.58 [1107] dbg: diag: module installed: MIME::Base64, version 3.07 [1107] dbg: diag: module installed: HTML::Parse

Re: SA-Update error messages

On Tuesday 24 October 2006 08:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:19:37AM -0800, John Andersen wrote: > > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. > [...] > > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 95. > > > > ev

Re: SA-Update error messages

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:19:37AM -0800, John Andersen wrote: > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. [...] > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 95. > > eval { use Net::DNS; }; [...] > eval { use IO::Zlib 1.04; }; Just curi

Re: SA-Update error messages

You have to install these package via CPAN. John Andersen ha scritto: Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines: Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91

SA-Update error messages

Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines: Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91. Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line

Re: sa-update error

On Friday 04 August 2006 9:33 am, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > The problem is, yet again, of assumption. The code assumes that if the > update directory exists, that certain channel files will be in there > because it creates them (aka: channel.cf and channel.pre). So when an > update occurs, the co

Re: sa-update error

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:25:04AM -0500, Chris wrote: > > Aha! I see the issue! Crap! > > Theo, why would you get this if the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001004 'does' > exist? The problem is, yet again, of assumption. The code assumes that if the update directory exists, that certain channel f

Re: sa-update error

On Thursday 03 August 2006 10:17 am, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > > >> channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to > > >> continue anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694 > > >> --lint -D shows no errors, just wondering i

Re: sa-update error

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > >> channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue > >> anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694 > >> --lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be concerned? > > I don't use updatedir - just straight

Re: sa-update error

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:06:31 -0400, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote: >> channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue >> anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694 >> --lint -D shows no errors, just wonde

Re: sa-update error

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue > anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694 > --lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be concerned? Hrm. Well, it's one of those "features" as opposed

sa-update error

Hi All, I ran sa-update across several Centos 64 & 32 bit machines here yesterday and today and received the following error... channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694 --lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be co