Hi ,Few days ago, finished installing postfix 3.0 and spamassassin 3.4 ,
I have a doubt with the part of downstream server MX, so I defined
my MX in DNS:
### Actual DNS
domain.com. IN MX 0 scmmific.domain.com.
### this would be the recommended settings ###:
domain.com. IN MX 0
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org ? it makes exactly the same job,
but halves number of
Am 21.02.2015 um 14:49 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
why not reject_rbl_client
On 02/17/2015 11:16 PM, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 16:10 GMT-06:00 Axb axb.li...@gmail.com:
_
also prevented by my suggestion of header_checks BCC with Postfix 3.0
Note 1: the BCC address is added as if it was
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
--
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks and *not* smtp_header_checks, hence it
ok I'll be test with their advice, I will be in touch with you
regardss
2015-02-17 14:16 GMT-06:00 Antony Stone
antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it:
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount
Am 17.02.2015 um 21:05 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks and *not* smtp_header_checks, hence it need to be
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:25 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
while my other answer solves the how to
Am 17.02.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Antony Stone:
On Tuesday 17 Feb 2015 at 20:05, ricky gutierrez wrote:
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.nethttp://www.fluxlabs.net/ | Endless
Solutions
Office : 850-250-5590x501tel:850-250-5590;501 | Cell :
850-890-2543tel:850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955tel:850-254-2955
On Feb 17, 2015, at 1:05 PM, ricky
Hi , I have mounted one gateway filtering me all spam in the business,
I have to postfix + centos6.6 + amavisd-new 2.8 + clamav +
spamassassin, currently captures 65% of spam the other 35 gets
through, I want to improve the effectiveness making a Bayesian db.
I am not an expert in postfix and
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Jeremy McSpadden:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
that was not the question
the question was how to get spam/ham-samples for train bayes after all
other filters and RBL's are running in a sane setup long before
contentfilters
see me response to that
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:03 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
Hi , I have mounted one gateway filtering me all spam in the business,
I have to postfix + centos6.6 + amavisd-new 2.8 + clamav +
spamassassin, currently captures 65% of spam the other 35 gets
through, I want to improve the effectiveness making a
2015-02-17 13:44 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
where the ccount lives don't matter
the only resticiton is that header_checks BCC in Postfix 3.0 only works
for header_checks and *not* smtp_header_checks, hence it need to be
defined on the downstream server instead on the
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific account.
I was looking for how to handle this with postfix
2015-02-17 13:14 GMT-06:00 Reindl Harald
Am 17.02.2015 um 20:38 schrieb ricky gutierrez:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific account.
I was looking for how to handle this with postfix
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org ? it
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific account.
I was looking for how to handle this with
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Axb:
On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
2015-02-17 13:06 GMT-06:00 Jeremy McSpadden jer...@fluxlabs.net:
Are you using any RBLs with postfix ?
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:
Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client
On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through transport map from the gw send
e-mail server to another server with a specific
On 02/17/2015 10:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Axb:
On 02/17/2015 10:44 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 13:38 -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote:
this solution looks cool , I was thinking of putting another server
with a specific account and through
2015-02-17 16:10 GMT-06:00 Axb axb.li...@gmail.com:
_
also prevented by my suggestion of header_checks BCC with Postfix 3.0
Note 1: the BCC address is added as if it was specified with
NOTIFY=NONE. The sender will not
25 matches
Mail list logo
