SpamAssassin 3.4.2 -- RPM for CentOS 5

(this may work fine with the Fedora SRPM too): wget https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kevin/spamassassin-el/epel-6-x86_64/00801043-spamassassin/spamassassin-3.4.2-2.el6.src.rpm 6) As unprivileged, install the spec file: rpm --nomd5 -i spamassassin-3.4.2-2.el6.src.rpm 7) Build

Re: Spamassassin 3.4.2 RPM for CentOS 6

--On Monday, October 22, 2018 3:46 PM + Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: rpm for Centos 7??? If you're comfortable rebuilding a source RPM, see my thread on using the Fedora 29 SRPM on CentOS 7. If you've modified your sysconfig file, you'll need to remove the daemon switch to use it with that

Re: Spamassassin 3.4.2 RPM for CentOS 6

rpm for Centos 7???

Re: Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:27:01PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 10/10/2018 9:43 PM, Henrik K wrote: > >There's no need to avoid editing .pre files. They are versioned for reason > >and old ones are never changed after release. > > The SPF plugin is enabled in init.pre, so it isn't

Re: Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 06:41:21PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > (I'd wanted to avoid editing the distro-supplied file and change the > setting in a subsequent site file but that's not possible to opt out of a > loadplugin.) There's no need to avoid editing .pre files. They are versioned for

Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

I'm trying to update my CentOS 7 distro 3.4.0 package to the 3.4.2 source package in the Fedora 29 repo and wanted to alert others to possible issues. <https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/29/Everything/source/tree/Packages/s/spamassassin-3.4.2-2.fc29.src.rpm>

Re: Spamassassin 3.4.2 RPM for CentOS 6

Thnk. El El mié, oct. 10, 2018 a las 1:40 a. m., Alessio Cecchi escribió: > Hi, > > if someone, like me, is interesting into spamassassin 3.4.2 rpm for CentOS > 6 here you can find the right repo: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kevin/spamassassin-el/

Spamassassin 3.4.2 RPM for CentOS 6

Hi, if someone, like me, is interesting into spamassassin 3.4.2 rpm for CentOS 6 here you can find the right repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kevin/spamassassin-el/packages/ Ciao -- Alessio Cecchi Postmaster @ http://www.qboxmail.it https://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

Hi! Yep, you are right! After start the command looks like: /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/spamd -m 5 -4 -d -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid But after reload: /usr/local/bin/perl5 -T -w /usr/local/bin/spamd -m 5 -4 -d -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid So, it is perl vs perl5. Probably that is

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 15:59:10 +0100 RW wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:39:06 -0700 (MST) > Vlad Shpolyanskiy wrote: > > > Hi All! > > > > I have recently upgraded SA to the latest version. > > I'm running SA on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4, SA installed via pkg > > utility with default set of options.

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:39:06 -0700 (MST) Vlad Shpolyanskiy wrote: > Hi All! > > I have recently upgraded SA to the latest version. > I'm running SA on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4, SA installed via pkg > utility with default set of options. > The running command looks like: > /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

On 10/5/2018 4:22 AM, Vlad Shpolyanskiy wrote: > sa-spamd.sa-spamd > > Just in case I have attached FreeBSD script. > May be you are right, I posted to the wrong place, should address this to > the FreeBSD port maintainer.

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

sa-spamd.sa-spamd Just in case I have attached FreeBSD script. May be you are right, I posted to the wrong place, should address this to the FreeBSD port maintainer. -- Sent from:

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

Kevin A. McGrail-5 wrote > What command are you using to restart? There was a small change in the > process listing that might affect tools from distros. I think it is this > bug: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7594 > > -- > Kevin A. McGrail > VP Fundraising, Apache

Re: spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

On 10/4/2018 3:39 PM, Vlad Shpolyanskiy wrote: Hi All! I have recently upgraded SA to the latest version. I'm running SA on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4, SA installed via pkg utility with default set of options. The running command looks like: /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/spamd -m 5 -4

spamassassin-3.4.2 and reload command

Hi All! I have recently upgraded SA to the latest version. I'm running SA on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4, SA installed via pkg utility with default set of options. The running command looks like: /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/spamd -m 5 -4 -d -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid Now I have a

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 - errors Util.pm

Good to know that I'm not the only one with Util.pm warnings. Debug logs from "spamd -D" : Sep 21 13:59:31 spamd[15151]: check: check_main, time limit in 299.874 s Sep 21 13:59:31 spamd[15151]: check: running tests for priority: -1000 Sep 21 13:59:31 spamd[15244]: get_user_groups: uid is 507 Sep

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 - errors Util.pm

We have another report on this issue at https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7629 Can you add debug output?  Are you able to test if we can get you a patch? Bill, it looks like get_user_groups is not always working in Util.pm Adding this as a blocker for 3.4.3 Regards, KAM On

SpamAssassin 3.4.2 - errors Util.pm

Hello, I have just upgraded SA from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2. OS: Centos 6.10 spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 running on Perl version 5.10.1 During message scanning there are errors in /var/log/maillog: Sep 20 11:50:38 spamd[13369]: Use of uninitialized value $( in numeric ne (!=) at

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

Thanks for the feedback! On Sep 19, 2018 03:14, "Groach" wrote: Thanks Kevin Both of my installations had stopped updating since 11th September due to this. Now the updates are working again. >From this: 11th Sep 20:00:26.57 Performing Spamassassin Update check... Update available for

***UNCHECKED*** Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

Thanks Kevin Both of my installations had stopped updating since 11th September due to this. Now the updates are working again. From this: 11th Sep 20:00:26.57 Performing Spamassassin Update check... Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org: 1840397 -> 1840441 http: (lwp) GET

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

Thanks. Had to add the path but now http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/MIRRORED.BY is exempted from SSL redirection. This will help with older clients. -- Kevin A. McGrail VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:41:09AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Hi Bill, I think it might be an older wget or LWP or what not that can't > deal with MIRRORED.BY being https.  Michael from linuxmagic also > reported a similar issue. > > Can anyone help with a .htaccess that exempts the

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

Hi Bill, I think it might be an older wget or LWP or what not that can't deal with MIRRORED.BY being https.  Michael from linuxmagic also reported a similar issue. Can anyone help with a .htaccess that exempts the MIRRORED.BY? Current lines: Redirect /favicon.ico

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

On 17 Sep 2018, at 22:57, James Hsieh wrote: So this is odd: I finally started this without the daemonize option to see if it gave me anything more enlightening and got: Sep 17 22:44:15.326 [21704] error: config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'? config: no rules were

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

l/lib -ldl -lz -lnsl -lsocket spamc/getopt.c:24:17: fatal error: err.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `spamc/spamc' Current working directory /export/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2 *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error:

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

any creative ways for getting around the fact that err.h is now >>>>> part of spamc/getopt.c? This breaks older OSes (which admittedly I >>>>> probably shouldn't care about or use anymore) such as Solaris 10. For a >>>>> double dot release, this see

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

usr/ccs/lib >>> -L/opt/solarisstudio12.3/prod/lib/sparc -L/opt/solarisstudio12.3/prod/lib >>> -L/lib -L/usr/local/lib -ldl -lz -lnsl -lsocket >>> spamc/getopt.c:24:17: fatal error: err.h: No such file or directory >>> compilation terminated. >>> *** E

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

sr/ccs/lib >> -L/opt/solarisstudio12.3/prod/lib/sparc -L/opt/solarisstudio12.3/prod/lib >> -L/lib -L/usr/local/lib -ldl -lz -lnsl -lsocket >> spamc/getopt.c:24:17: fatal error: err.h: No such file or directory >> compilation terminated. >> *** Error c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

El El dom, sep. 16, 2018 a las 11:31 p. m., Reio Remma escribió: > > Download link @WeTransfer: > > https://we.tl/t-CbvKhwJoCA > > spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.x86_64.rpm > > Will be deleted on 24 September, 2018. > > Good luck, > Reio Thnk > > -- rickygm http://gnuforever.homelinux.com

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

ldl -lz -lnsl -lsocket > spamc/getopt.c:24:17: fatal error: err.h: No such file or directory > compilation terminated. > *** Error code 1 > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `spamc/spamc' > Current working directory /export/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2 > *** Error code 1 &g

SpamAssassin 3.4.2. - err.h requirement

error: Command failed for target `spamc/spamc' Current working directory /export/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2 *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `spamc/spamc' --James

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

--On Monday, September 17, 2018 3:13 PM -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: You can install the srpm and then in /usr/src/RedHat you get various files like tar files and patches with a spec file that says how to build it. That path would be if you were building as root, which is not

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

--On Monday, September 17, 2018 3:13 PM -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: You can install the srpm and then in /usr/src/RedHat you get various files like tar files and patches with a spec file that says how to build it. That path would be if you were building as root, which is not

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 15:22:48 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: [snip] > Good to know. Did the Makefile.PL gracefully tell you that your > Makemaker was too old? It did indeed, which made the fix very simple. Thanks for your hard work! Regards, Dianne.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On 9/17/2018 3:05 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:22:32 -0400 > "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > >> I'd be pretty shocked if you have to do very much to that src rpm for >> 3.4.1 to get 3.4.2 working. > I ran into one gotcha on (ancient) Debian 5; the version of > ExtUtils::MakeMaker

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:22:32 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > I'd be pretty shocked if you have to do very much to that src rpm for > 3.4.1 to get 3.4.2 working. I ran into one gotcha on (ancient) Debian 5; the version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker was too old. Installing from CPAN did the trick.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

Recommend you might take a look.  You can install the srpm and then in /usr/src/RedHat you get various files like tar files and patches with a spec file that says how to build it.  Some are complex, some are easy.  Then you rpmbuild to make an RPM that you can install. If you can do a batch file,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

> On Sep 17, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > I'd be pretty shocked if you have to do very much to that src rpm for > 3.4.1 to get 3.4.2 working. Possibly if I knew what I was doing with src rpms, that would be the case. ;-) Hoping someone who knows a lot more than I do is

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

Sep 16, 2018, at 11:30 PM, Reio Remma wrote: >> >> On 17.09.2018 4:13, Ricky Gutierrez wrote: >>> Reio hi, Could you please share the rpm o src for centOS? >> Download link @WeTransfer: >> >> https://we.tl/t-CbvKhwJoCA >> >> spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

https://we.tl/t-CbvKhwJoCA > > spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.x86_64.rpm > > Will be deleted on 24 September, 2018. > > Good luck, > Reio

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On 17.09.2018 4:13, Ricky Gutierrez wrote: Reio hi, Could you please share the rpm o src for centOS? Download link @WeTransfer: https://we.tl/t-CbvKhwJoCA spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.x86_64.rpm Will be deleted on 24 September, 2018. Good luck, Reio

Re: [SECURITY] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 resolves CVE-2017-15705, CVE-2016-1238, CVE-2018-11780 & CVE-2018-11781

Reindl, I question whether I should bother rewarding your bad behavior and again ask.you if you find your negative attitude gets you where you want to be in life? But for others, here are the facts and the policy. "we see that you mentioned these CVE names public at

Re: [SECURITY] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 resolves CVE-2017-15705, CVE-2016-1238, CVE-2018-11780 & CVE-2018-11781

On 9/16/2018 5:44 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Thanks for the post.  The bug is way out of line though. Earlier bug that should probably be the one tracked: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629474

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

Reio hi, Could you please share the rpm o src for centOS? El El dom, sep. 16, 2018 a las 2:10 p. m., Reio Remma escribió: > > > Wonderful, thank you all for your hard work! > > I encountered no problems at all when building a new RPM for CentOS 7. > > Thanks and good luck, > Reio > -- rickygm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 20:54 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Please point them here if they need help. It is a good drop in > upgrade. I would assume it being a security update they'd be on the ball. I'll wait a few days before I ask about it. I could install via cpan but would rather wait on

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

Please point them here if they need help. It is a good drop in upgrade. On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 20:45 Chris wrote: > On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 11:03 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Good Morning, > > > > On behalf of the Apache SpamAssassin Project Management Committee, I > > am > > very pleased to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 11:03 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Good Morning, > > On behalf of the Apache SpamAssassin Project Management Committee, I > am > very pleased to announce the release of Apache SpamAssassin v3.4.2. > This release contains security bug fixes. A security announcement >

Re: [SECURITY] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 resolves CVE-2017-15705, CVE-2016-1238, CVE-2018-11780 & CVE-2018-11781

Thanks for the post. The bug is way out of line though. We posted release candidate 1 on the 12th noting the 4 CVE issues coming. I also backchanneled with RH as a heads up. We do have a brain... I have 3.4.2 installed on centos 7 and it was drop-in other than the redhat specific paths,

Re: [SECURITY] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 resolves CVE-2017-15705, CVE-2016-1238, CVE-2018-11780 & CVE-2018-11781

Here's the Red Hat Bugzilla bug requesting a new package for Fedora/RHEL be issued ASAP: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629491 Once the official package drops, you should be able to download the SRPM here:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

; -KAM > > > Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.4.2 > > Introduction > > > Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 contains numerous tweaks and bug fixes over the > past three and 1/2 years. As we release 3.4.2, we are preparing 4.0.0 > which > will m

Re: [SECURITY] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 resolves CVE-2017-15705, CVE-2016-1238, CVE-2018-11780 & CVE-2018-11781

, 16:59 Reindl Harald wrote: > i doubt that it is wiese to blwo out security notes *that short* after > release and *that long* after the last release > > Am 16.09.18 um 18:59 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: > > Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 was recently released [1], and fixes several >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On 16.09.2018 18:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Good Morning, On behalf of the Apache SpamAssassin Project Management Committee, I am very pleased to announce the release of Apache SpamAssassin v3.4.2. This release contains security bug fixes.  A security announcement will follow within the next

[SECURITY] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 resolves CVE-2017-15705, CVE-2016-1238, CVE-2018-11780 & CVE-2018-11781

Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 was recently released [1], and fixes several issues of security note. First, a denial of service vulnerability that exists in all modern versions. The vulnerability arises with certain unclosed tags in emails that cause markup to be handled incorrectly leading to scan

[ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

mailing lists is available at https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists -KAM Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.4.2 Introduction Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 contains numerous tweaks and bug fixes over the past three and 1/2 years.  As we release 3.4.2, we

Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Release Candidate 1 is available

Hello all, The Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 release candidate 1 files are available at http://talon2.pccc.com/~kmcgrail/devel/ The Project Management Committee believes these are release worthy and invites you to give feedback to prepare a full release in the imminent future. The Release Notes

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, David Jones wrote: Fedora is way too unstable to use for a server that you want to keep around for years. Accepted in general, not necessarily for SA. We're only talking about the Fedora SA packages. There is so much tweaking and customization to setting up a mail

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On Apr 17, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > > At my last job where there were supported RHEL machines, I asked a RH support > person a similar question regarding Postfix and got the answer: "If you want > Fedora, you know where to get it." I'd

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 04/17/2018 05:19 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 17 Apr 2018, at 16:54, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, David Jones wrote: On 04/17/2018 03:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Dave, why would it go into EPEL?  SpamAssassin is a core RPM. I will be updating my main SA platform servers to

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 17 Apr 2018, at 18:13, David Jones wrote: Why hasn't the packaging in RHEL/CentOS been updated to 3.4.1? At my last job where there were supported RHEL machines, I asked a RH support person a similar question regarding Postfix and got the answer: "If you want Fedora, you know where to

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 17 Apr 2018, at 16:54, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, David Jones wrote: On 04/17/2018 03:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Dave, why would it go into EPEL?  SpamAssassin is a core RPM. I will be updating my main SA platform servers to CentOS 7 this summer so this should be good

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 04/17/2018 04:39 PM, Bill Cole wrote: On 17 Apr 2018, at 16:38, David Jones wrote: On 04/17/2018 03:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Dave, why would it go into EPEL?  SpamAssassin is a core RPM. Oh yeh.  I guess because it's been so long since we had an update and my main boxes are

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 17 Apr 2018, at 16:38, David Jones wrote: On 04/17/2018 03:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Dave, why would it go into EPEL?  SpamAssassin is a core RPM. Oh yeh. I guess because it's been so long since we had an update and my main boxes are running CentOS/SL 6.9 that I forgot it was a

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, David Jones wrote: On 04/17/2018 03:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Dave, why would it go into EPEL?  SpamAssassin is a core RPM. I will be updating my main SA platform servers to CentOS 7 this summer so this should be good timing to get SA 3.4.2 from the core repo

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:38 PM, David Jones wrote: > > The CentOS 5 and 6 boxes out there aren't going to get the new version unless > it gets put in some other repo like EPEL or another third party since they > are not getting any updates. EPEL 5 is frozen AFAIK. This would

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 04/17/2018 03:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Dave, why would it go into EPEL?  SpamAssassin is a core RPM. Oh yeh. I guess because it's been so long since we had an update and my main boxes are running CentOS/SL 6.9 that I forgot it was a core package. The CentOS 5 and 6 boxes out

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Dave, why would it go into EPEL? SpamAssassin is a core RPM. -- Kevin A. McGrail Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Amir Caspi

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On Apr 17, 2018, at 1:12 PM, David Jones wrote: > > Once 3.4.2 comes out soon, we need to get an official version in EPEL or > something. Hopefully someone knows someone at EPEL to make this happen. I > think everyone had to build 3.4.1 themselves from the Fedora RPM spec

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 04/17/2018 02:00 PM, Reio Remma wrote: Mkay. Half an evening of figuring out how RPM building works and voila. Let the testing commence. :) Running transaction   Updating   : spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.centos.x86_64   Cleanup    : spamassassin-3.4.1-17.el7.centos.x86_64   Verifying

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Mkay. Half an evening of figuring out how RPM building works and voila. Let the testing commence. :) Running transaction   Updating   : spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.centos.x86_64   Cleanup    : spamassassin-3.4.1-17.el7.centos.x86_64   Verifying  : spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.centos.x86_64   Verifying

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Svn for 3.4 is very stable and suitable for most production level machines IMO. -- Kevin A. McGrail Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Alex

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Hi, > Can't wait for all the little fixes. For now I've carried some over by hand > to cut down on log errors (TxRep etc). Are you pulling from svn? I've been doing that for some time and it's stable and I'm assuming has all the current fixes. It requires you to build it yourself from scratch,

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 17.04.18 16:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: It was squashed by the pmc when the ruleqa was broken but happy to say it's in progress again and I will have an rc building again soon. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 09:13 Reio Remma > wrote: Greetings,

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

It was squashed by the pmc when the ruleqa was broken but happy to say it's in progress again and I will have an rc building again soon. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 09:13 Reio Remma wrote: > Greetings, > > any new on 3.4.2 release? I read that testing was done a year ago, but >

SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Greetings, any new on 3.4.2 release? I read that testing was done a year ago, but everything is silent after that. :) Thanks! Reio