On May 1, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Anyway, just thought you ought to know about the high volume thing.
You
might get your end running sweet and fast, but it may cause rejected
lookups when you're scanning mail.
I'm pretty much putting Pyzor on the back burner for now.
help folks!
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason J. Ellingson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Ben Poliakoff
Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using Pzyor with high volume
I am trying those settings, yet I get no Pyzor
have success!
Thanks for your help folks!
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason J. Ellingson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Ben Poliakoff
Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using Pzyor with high volume
I am
: Thursday, May 01, 2008 9:31 AM
To: Jason J. Ellingson
Cc: Ben Poliakoff; Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume
Hi;
I have it running and it works, load is down and free mem up, but not
certain if that is just because I've restarted spamd a few
]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:00 AM
To: Jason J. Ellingson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume
Hi;
Since you are running the server portion as nobody... Then the
spamd
user account needs to stay as nobody.
We run SA as a system filter, so no calls
On 30.04.08 16:39, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
readyexec is *USER* specific. You *MUST* launch the readyexecd.py
server part as the SAME user as the user of readyexec client.
My spamd service is run as a user spamc, while I was adding the
service as root.
Now, that I have the service
.
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 12:31 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume
On 30.04.08 16:39, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
readyexec is *USER* specific. You *MUST* launch
In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this
at any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl
module that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA having to
exec the python interpreter and having that setup/teardown time for
each and every
In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this
at any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl
module that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA having to
exec the python interpreter and having that setup/teardown time for
each and
* Robert Blayzor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080430 07:46]:
In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this at
any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl module
that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA having to exec the
python interpreter
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Ben Poliakoff wrote:
Seems to be just the sort of thing to address your concern (short of
a perl implementation of the pyzor client). I should note that *I*
haven't used the ReadyExec stuff in my environment [1] (where
executing
the pyzor client hasn't been much
, 2008 11:05 AM
To: Ben Poliakoff
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Ben Poliakoff wrote:
Seems to be just the sort of thing to address your concern (short of
a perl implementation of the pyzor client). I should note that *I
* Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080430 10:59]:
I decided to look into this as well.
I managed to get ReadyExec installed, but am having difficulty changing
the Pyzor.pm to find and use readyexec properly. Anyone else have luck?
This works for me:
readyexecd.py /tmp/pyzor
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:02 PM
To: Jason J. Ellingson
Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume
* Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080430 10:59]:
I decided to look into this as well.
I managed to get ReadyExec installed
On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
Yup... I got the server portion running... The trick now is to get
SpamAssassin to use readyexec /tmp/pyzor instead of just pyzor...
Any suggestions? I was looking at modifying Pyzor.pm in the
SpamAssassin perl directory.
My guess..
* Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080430 11:07]:
Yup... I got the server portion running... The trick now is to get
SpamAssassin to use readyexec /tmp/pyzor instead of just pyzor...
Any suggestions? I was looking at modifying Pyzor.pm in the
SpamAssassin perl directory.
Something
. Ellingson
Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume
* Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080430 11:07]:
Yup... I got the server portion running... The trick now is to get
SpamAssassin to use readyexec /tmp/pyzor instead of just pyzor...
Any
* Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080430 13:21]:
I am trying those settings, yet I get no Pyzor hits.
I can manually do a readyexec /tmp/pyzor ping which works fine...
Any other suggestions?
Try running spamassassin with debug mode on (-D) look for pyzor related
stuff.
Ben
--
!
Thanks for your help folks!
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason J. Ellingson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Ben Poliakoff
Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using Pzyor with high volume
I am trying those settings, yet
19 matches
Mail list logo
