On 11/29/2011 10:48 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
You are likely correct you were told that. However, speaking on
behalf of the project, the mess of differing licenses and limits for
RBLs and related projects has been very difficult to define a one-size
fits all answer to the question of testi
On 11/29/2011 10:27 AM, Rob McEwen wrote:
Instead, imo, the RBLs that you *do* need are the ones with (1)
extreme few FPs and (2) which block spams that your other currently
implemented RBLs are missing (particularly compared to those other
RBLs w/extreme low FPs since RBLs with moderate-to-hig
On 11/29/2011 1:34 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:55 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please
open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data is not freely available,
it would be useful to list on the spamassassin wiki.
On 11/28/2011 1:55 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please
> open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data is not freely available,
> it would be useful to list on the spamassassin wiki.
Darxus,
I'd love to have the invalue
On 11/28/2011 2:25 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 28.11.2011 20:17, schrieb Daniel McDonald:
>> On 11/28/11 12:55 PM, "dar...@chaosreigns.com"
>> wrote:
>>> If there are better blocklists that are not used by spamassassin, please
>>> open a bug to have it evaluated. Even if the data is not fre
On Nov 28, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
> The best RBLS for getting rid of snow-shoe spammers are from Invaluement,
> but it is avaiable by subscription only. I don't know if Rob McEwen
> has any interest in running it through GA...
But the subscription rates are very reasonable com
Am 28.11.2011 20:17, schrieb Daniel McDonald:
>
>
>
> On 11/28/11 12:55 PM, "dar...@chaosreigns.com"
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/28, Sergio wrote:
>>>in your opinion, what it will be the best RBL Anti Spam list that could
>>>not be left in a server, payed or free?
>>
>> All the best known RBLs
On 11/28/11 12:55 PM, "dar...@chaosreigns.com"
wrote:
> On 11/28, Sergio wrote:
>>in your opinion, what it will be the best RBL Anti Spam list that could
>>not be left in a server, payed or free?
>
> All the best known RBLs are enabled in spamassassin by default.
>
> If there are be
On 11/28, Sergio wrote:
>in your opinion, what it will be the best RBL Anti Spam list that could
>not be left in a server, payed or free?
All the best known RBLs are enabled in spamassassin by default.
You may get more useful suggestions if you provide several example spam
emails using so
Hi,
in your opinion, what it will be the best RBL Anti Spam list that could not
be left in a server, payed or free?
My server is an small server with a few accounts, but it seems that my RBLs
are not the best ones and I will like to have your inputs in which ones I
will need to relay on.
Best Reg
10 matches
Mail list logo