On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:13:24 -0500, Lindsay Haisley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
>> You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
>> away.
>
>I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
>away in about 1
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
> You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
> away.
I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
away in about 15 minutes.
--
Lindsay Haisley |"Fighting against human | PGP public key
FM
From: "Phil Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:22, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf
On Thursday 28 June 2007 17:02, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I don't know what would be gained by a random wait.
The idea of a random wait for contention resolution is long standing. It's
built into the TCP/IP protocol for example.
For example, say my cron job runs at 3 am. Lot's of them probably
On Thursday 28 June 2007 16:39, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:33:43PM -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> > Do I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the
> > older rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
>
> Yes.
I suspected as much.
Thank you,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:33:43PM -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> Do I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the
> older
> rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
Yes.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"I lost my foo." - Theo
pgpgySBNRd9Tg.pgp
Des
I need to remove the rules, in /etc/mail/spamassassin, to prevent the older
rules from overriding any updates that may come in?
Thanks,
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:34, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:18 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > > sa-update and rules_du_jour dea
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:46 -0400, Phil Barnett wrote:
> I'm going to try this, but with a 5 minute wait. I run it in the middle of
> the
> night anyway, who cares how long it takes.
>
> Actually, the proper response might be a random wait.
The HTML that gets sent by SARE is:
If this were
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:18 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories.
> I
> > use both.
>
> sa-update can use both, if I'm not mistaken. I distantly remember
> configuring it to do so.
http://s
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:22, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
> sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this patch
> greps the dow
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:39 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> Why not just use sa-update and not deal with this?
>
> sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories. I
> use both.
sa-update can use both, if I'm not mistaken
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 15:39 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Why not just use sa-update and not deal with this?
sa-update and rules_du_jour deal with different rules repositories. I
use both.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "In an open world,| PGP public key
FMP Computer Services
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:22:32PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
> sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file.
Why not just use sa-update and
Attached is a proposed patch for /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
which addresses the problem of the refresh URL which Rules Emporium
sometimes sends out instead of a valid cf file. Basically, this patch
greps the downloaded file for the string "META HTTP-EQUIV", which should
never
At 10:52 AM Monday, 6/18/2007, Lindsay Haisley wrote -=>
--lint has failed so it'll run properly next time.
--- /root/rules_du_jour.orig2007-06-17 21:01:24.0 -0500
+++ /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour 2007-06-18 12:37:44.0
It seems as if the problem HTML redirect page is hiding somewhere when
rules_du_jour gets to its SA lint check, and it doesn't show up until
the rollback is done, so the patch I sent earlier isn't effective. I'll
need to read the code more thoroughly and don't have time now, s
files are
produced in /etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJour; 99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf and
99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2. Apparently the rules_du_jour script can't
recover from this and consistently fails on successive runs until the
bad files are manually deleted.
I haven't gone over the bash script in rules_du
sassin.apache.org
> Subject: rules_du_jour site down?
>
> Greetings;
>
> I got an email from cron's attempt to run rules_du_jour this morning,
full
> of 404 messages, curl couldn't find www.rulesemporiam.com.
>
> Re-running it by hand gets be the same thing, one stanza of
Greetings;
I got an email from cron's attempt to run rules_du_jour this morning, full
of 404 messages, curl couldn't find www.rulesemporiam.com.
Re-running it by hand gets be the same thing, one stanza of this per rule:
SARE Spoof Ruleset had an unknown error:
curl exit code:
For the SARE rules you only need to use ONE of sa-update or
rules_du_jour. Either works fine. sa-update has the potential to get
you newer rules faster without any significant additional load on the
servers serving the channels.
Assuming you want to use sa-update for everything
that should do the same thing using
different method, didn't I ? (sa-update + rules_du_jour script...)
Should i now just have to run the sa-update command line from crontab to
update everything ? Or should i add parameters like : sa-update
--channelfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-updat
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dos]$ grep " CF_URLS\[" rules_du_jour | grep -v
> RULESEMPORIUM
>
> CF_URLS[7]="http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf";
>
>
> antidrug.cf isn't being updated ever again and it
Alan Munday wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 17:31:
Is a migration document really necessary? Stop using the rule files
you got via RDJ that you now want to get with sa-update. Start using
sa-update for those rule files. Have some lunch.
Agreed - I do like to l
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 17:31:
This isn't aimed at you in particular, but why does it seem that a
really large number of people assume that sa-update isn't going to work
correctly, or well, by default? Is it their past experience with the
quality of SpamAssassin
those rule files. Have some lunch.
The only other thing (AFAIK) that would hold someone from moving is that
RDJ still covers some rule sets that are not available via sa-update.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dos]$ grep " CF_URLS\[" rules_du_jour | grep -v RULESEMPORIUM
CF_URLS[7]="htt
Hi!
I'm not sure if this is the place to post rules_du_jour problem
but the http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour version 1.29
contain an invalid url for 70_sare_stocks.cf
CF_URLS[70]="${RULESEMPORIUM}/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf";
should be
CF_URLS[70]=&
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 00:31:
Advantage over sa-update? Other than the issue with 3.1.6 (only), there
shouldn't be any issues with how sa-update lints rules.
This is not obvious as there is no mention of linting in the docs http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3
Alan Munday wrote:
By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the
stock
rules. However, there have been additional channels created for
sa-update
to allow it to update the SARE rules as well. You just add the ones you
want to your sa-update channels file.
One advantage
By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the stock
rules. However, there have been additional channels created for sa-update
to allow it to update the SARE rules as well. You just add the ones you
want to your sa-update channels file.
One advantage RDJ seems to have is
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> René Berber wrote:
[snip]
>> Are you sure?
>>
>> I'm using both and I don't see any duplication of score hits. For
>> instance, what is the SA equivalent to 70_sare_stocks.cf?
>
> By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the stock
> rules. However, t
René Berber wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > Bazooka Joe wrote:
> > > Thx Bowie
> > >
> > > That fixed rdj.
> > >
> > > But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj?
> >
> > Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still
> > using RDJ for rule updates, so I can't help yo
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Bazooka Joe wrote:
>> Thx Bowie
>>
>> That fixed rdj.
>>
>> But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj?
>
> Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still using RDJ
> for rule updates, so I can't help you with the channel configuration.
Are you sure?
Bazooka Joe wrote:
> Thx Bowie
>
> That fixed rdj.
>
> But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj?
Yes, you can replace RDJ with the sa-update channels. I am still using RDJ
for rule updates, so I can't help you with the channel configuration.
--
Bowie
Thx Bowie
That fixed rdj.
But what about channels? Is that to replace rdj?
-bazooka
On 12/5/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bazooka Joe wrote:
> rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
> now but I have a different question. Has chann
Bazooka Joe wrote:
> rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
> now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced
> rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare
> rules?
>
> thx
>
> -bazooka
>
> ps I am usi
I think so. ran spamassassin --lint and no errors.
On 12/4/06, Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bazooka Joe wrote:
> rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
> now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced
> rules_du_jour? Sh
Bazooka Joe wrote:
> rules_du_jour seems to fail on lint. I am trying to figure that out
> now but I have a different question. Has channels replaced
> rules_du_jour? Should I be using something else to update my sare
> rules?
>
> thx
>
> -bazooka
>
> ps I am usi
Peter Matulis wrote:
> I am running amavisd 2.44 chrooted on OpenBSD 4.0. I am running
> rules_du_jour.sh and even though I specify my SA_DIR (inside
> /etc/rulesdujour/config) as /var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin I keep
> getting errors because I have score modifications for non-existent
> rules
I am running amavisd 2.44 chrooted on OpenBSD 4.0. I am running
rules_du_jour.sh and even though I specify my SA_DIR (inside
/etc/rulesdujour/config) as /var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin I keep
getting errors because I have score modifications for non-existent
rules inside /etc/mail/spamassassin/
_CID_* rules are part of 70_sare_stocks.cf
You should check out this recent thread from the SA list: http://
www.nabble.com/rules_du_jour-question-tf2533374.html#a7062324
I''ve posted some comments on my setup there.
Here's another suggestion/tip/request: please don't start new t
Those kinds op spam are hitting all kinds of rules here, including
rulesets from SARE:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.1 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0
tests=BAYES_99, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, HTML_10_20, HTML_MESSAGE,
MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2, MY_CID_AND_CLOSING, MY_CID_AND_STYLE,
MY_CID_ARIAL2_CLOSING,
Has anyone come up with a rule that will combat the spam that I have been
seeing lately?
That is a spam that rambles about much of nothing then has an image or a
link at the bottom.
I see more and more of these and it seems like the spammers have figured
out a way to get this past SA.
I include
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 01:41 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, October 29, 2006 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>
> > rules_du_jour restarts amavisd-new after it runs, but sa-update
> > doesn't. Do most people run it out of cron and simply append an
> > (
On Sun, October 29, 2006 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> rules_du_jour restarts amavisd-new after it runs, but sa-update
> doesn't. Do most people run it out of cron and simply append an
> (without the quotes, of course) " && /etc/init.d/amavis reload" to
On 29-okt-2006, at 17:55, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the
openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil ge
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil get you a spam detection rate >99%.
I'm doing all that, now, I th
on-sare rulesets that I see are available via
rules_du_jour (i.e., TRIPWIRE ANTIDRUG RANDOMVAL BOGUSVIRUS
ZMI_GERMAN)? Are those something I'd still likely want to get via
rules_du_jour?
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes t
under "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007".
>
>Two questions:
>
>Do many people use the non-sare rulesets that I see are available via
>rules_du_jour (i.e., TRIPWIRE ANTIDRUG RANDOMVAL BOGUSVIRUS
>ZMI_GERMAN)? Are those something I'd still likely want to get via
>rules
nsists only of "safe" rules.
Ok. I've set that up and run it and now I have the standard set or
rules and the safe sare rules under "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007".
Two questions:
Do many people use the non-sare rulesets that I see are available via
rules_du_jour (i.
On 29-okt-2006, at 7:38, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that "everybody" uses, or does ever
Many of them are SARE rulesets. Look at www.rulesemporium.com/rules to see
the descriptions of the various rulesets. No, not all of them are "safe".
Many of them are deliberately graded by your willingness to live with
possible FPs. In general they range from xxx0.cf for "dead safe" to xxx4 o
I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that "everybody" uses, or does everyone use all of them? How do you
decide which to use
Paul Matthews wrote on Wed, 24 May 2006 16:44:14 +1000 (EST):
> Can anyone give me a list of avaiable lists i can download? or tell me
> where to find a list of them?
They are all in that script!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conac
From: "Paul Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi there,
I've found this website
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
It's a list of rules that can automatically update, it's telling me in the
config file you can tell it what lists to download
TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT S
Paul Matthews wrote:
Hi there,
I've found this website
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
It's a list of rules that can automatically update, it's telling me in the
config file you can tell it what lists to download
TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0 SA
Hi there,
I've found this website
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
It's a list of rules that can automatically update, it's telling me in the
config file you can tell it what lists to download
TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1"
Can anyone gi
For the archive:
> > TROUBLE in check_mail: spam_scan FAILED: panic: swash_fetch at
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_specific.cf, rule SARE_SPEC_SHORTQ, line
> > 1, line 1706.
The problem turned out to be missing perl library directory 'unicore'
in chroot jail. The need for it is documented in
Peter,
> TROUBLE in check_mail: spam_scan FAILED: panic: swash_fetch at
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_specific.cf, rule SARE_SPEC_SHORTQ, line 1,
> line 1706.
Search the amavisd-new web page for 'swash_fetch'.
It is consequence of Perl bugs when handling UTF-8 characters.
What version of Per
--- Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:31:39 PM, you wrote:
>
> P> Looks like I had two problems simultaneously. The update issue was
> not
> P> causing the error it seems. The real problem I'm encountering
> appears to
> P> concern a
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:31:39 PM, you wrote:
P> Looks like I had two problems simultaneously. The update issue was not
P> causing the error it seems. The real problem I'm encountering appears to
P> concern a particular SARE rule. I am running amavisd-new with SA and this
P>
--- Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
> > Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when
> it
> > detects (how?) an update is required?
> >
>
> Nope.. it always needs to go out ov
--- Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
> > Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when
> it
> > detects (how?) an update is required?
> >
>
> Nope.. it always needs to go out ov
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter wrote:
> False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
detects (how?) an update is required?
N
jdow wrote:
> From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Peter wrote:
>> > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
>>
>>> Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
>>> detects (how?) an update is required?
>>>
>>
>> Nope.. it always nee
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter wrote:
> False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
detects (how?) an update is required?
Nope.. it always needs to go out over port 80. The "check
Peter wrote:
> False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
> Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
> detects (how?) an update is required?
>
Nope.. it always needs to go out over port 80. The "check for update" is done
using HTTP "If-Mod
--- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple of hours ago I started seeing errors regarding RDJ:
>
> exec: curl -w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s -S -z
> /var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour
> http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour 2>&a
A couple of hours ago I started seeing errors regarding RDJ:
exec: curl -w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s -S -z
/var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour
http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour 2>&1
curl_output: curl: (7) Failed to connect to 208.42.148.125: No route
Josh Trutwin wrote:
Is there a full changelog available online or otherwise for the
rules_du_jour script? I'm going to upgrade to the latest version but
I'm skipping a number of versions and I want to make sure I'm on top
of all the updates.
Thx,
Josh
Hi Josh,
No there i
Is there a full changelog available online or otherwise for the
rules_du_jour script? I'm going to upgrade to the latest version but
I'm skipping a number of versions and I want to make sure I'm on top
of all the updates.
Thx,
Josh
cked that queue this
morning (this was one of the more recent messages).
The problem that I was seeing was back on Sept 12. At that time I was unable
to reach "sandgnat.com", either with the rules_du_jour script or via web
browser.
Whatever was going on seems to have cleared up s
rning (this was one of the more recent messages).
The problem that I was seeing was back on Sept 12. At that time I was unable
to reach "sandgnat.com", either with the rules_du_jour script or via web
browser.
Whatever was going on seems to have cleared up since then.
Thank you,
On Mo
Subject: Rules_Du_Jour Site down?
Over the weekend my rules_du_jour started reporting connection errors
with "http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour";.
--09:53:00-- http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour
(try:15) => `rules_du_jour'
Connecting to sandgnat.com[208.42.148
Over the weekend my rules_du_jour started reporting connection errors
with "http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour";.
--09:53:00-- http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour
(try:15) => `rules_du_jour'
Connecting to sandgnat.com[208.42.148.125]:80... failed: Connection time
Dr Robert Young <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> decided to say on Friday, July 08,
2005 8:46 PM:
> Anyone have information on which ports would need to be opened for
> rules_du_jour to function?
As the other reply mentioned, it's just Port 80. But
we made a bonehead move
On Jul 8, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Dr Robert Young wrote:
Anyone have information on which ports would need to be opened for
rules_du_jour to function?
Just port 80. RulesDuJour downloads rules from an HTTP server using
either curl or wget.
Steven
Anyone have information on which ports would need to be opened for
rules_du_jour to function?
Allo,
Dr Robert Young wrote:
In configuring the rules_du_jour script for rule updates, I am a bit
concerned over my interpretation of the SA_RESTART parameter. It
sounds like it is a call to the routine to "stop and then re-start"
the spamd daemon. But the rules_du_jour example &
In configuring the rules_du_jour script for rule updates, I am a bit
concerned over my interpretation of the SA_RESTART parameter. It sounds
like it is a call to the routine to "stop and then re-start" the spamd
daemon. But the rules_du_jour example "kills" the spamd proce
t;;
DRY> SA_DIR="/home/rcyoung/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63";
DRY> MAIL_ADDRESS="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
DRY> SA_RESTART="killall -HUP spamd";
DRY> RULES_DU_JOUR_SCRIPT="/home/rcyoung/rules_du_jour";
I can't help you with RDJ itself, but
is duplic
Dr Robert Young wrote:
Interactively, there are a lot of messages saying "no such file or
directory" and "command not found".
Is this normal? I am uncertain as to how I can tell the update is
actually occurring (or not) .
Hi Robert,
No, this is not normal. Feel free to email me the
I pulled the rules_du_jour script down and ran it. I get
exec: wget -N http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour >
/home/rcyoung/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63/RulesDuJour/wget.log 2>&1
wget_output: --20:38:10-- http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour
=> `rules_du_jour'
Reso
Hi!
Attached is a diff for rules_du_jour.
I prefer to manually update my mail rules and push them out to my
servers, vs use cron on each. Since rules_du_jour is only one component
of my mail setup, I typically execute a script that updates it in
addition to other things. Unfortunately that
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 10:34 -0800, Scott Wolfe wrote:
> I am trying to get to www.exit0.us to download Rules_du_jour for a new SA
> install but am unable to get to that web site. Is there a new place to get
> that new script?
>
> -Scott
>
>
>
You can get the script d
I am trying to get to www.exit0.us to download Rules_du_jour for a new SA
install but am unable to get to that web site. Is there a new place to get
that new script?
-Scott
About a week ago my rules_du_jour cron job starting failing on the lint check.
I'm running SA 2.64 on a Debian sarge system kernel 2.4.25. Here's the end of
the errors I get if I run rules_du_jour in foreground.
Lint output: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration
That was fixed last week and posted here I thought - thanks. I don't know
how I lost the mail package, but installing mailx solved my problem. - John
- Original Message -
From: ".rp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: r
On 8 Sep 2004 at 20:55, John Fleming wrote:
> > > P.S. If you know how to get my mail command back, I obviously would
> like to
> > > know that too! It used to be there, and I have no idea why it
> disappeared!
> > >
> >
What do you get when you run
locate mail ?
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Spamassassin users"
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: RE: rules_du_jour
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: John F
>-Original Message-
>From: John Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 1:25 PM
>To: Spamassassin users
>Subject: Re: rules_du_jour
>
>
>Chris Thielen said:
>> Hi John
>>
>> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:10 -0500,
Chris Thielen said:
> Hi John
>
> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:10 -0500, John Fleming wrote:
>> I've been manually updating 8-9 rulesets every couple of months and,
>> with
>> Bayes, get great results. Now I'd like to use rules_du_jour.
>> rules_du_jour
Hi John
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:10 -0500, John Fleming wrote:
> I've been manually updating 8-9 rulesets every couple of months and, with
> Bayes, get great results. Now I'd like to use rules_du_jour. rules_du_jour
> is in /root/bin, and perms executable as suggested.
* Jim Sabatke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-09 03:14]:
> umm, you need the comment there. bash knows to look past it
> on the first line (and only the first line).
It's the kernel not the bash, that has to interpret the shebang line and
calls the interpreter/shell. For bash this is just a commen
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Sabatke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: rules_du_jour
> John Fleming wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jim Sabatke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Sabatke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: rules_du_jour
> John Fleming wrote:
> > P.S. If you know how to get my mail command back, I obviously would
like to
> > know that t
John Fleming wrote:
P.S. If you know how to get my mail command back, I obviously would like to
know that too! It used to be there, and I have no idea why it disappeared!
Oh, and as for mail, check whatever program your distro uses
(postfix, sendmail, etc.) and make sure it's running. You
migh
John Fleming wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Sabatke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1. Did you change the first line of rules_du_jour??
Er, NO! (painful) So what's the correct first line? (/bin/bash is my shell
path; I assume I need the "!") I uncommented
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Sabatke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamassassin"
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: rules_du_jour
> John Fleming wrote:
> > I've been manually updating 8-9 rulesets every couple of months and,
John Fleming wrote:
I've been manually updating 8-9 rulesets every couple of months and, with
Bayes, get great results. Now I'd like to use rules_du_jour. rules_du_jour
is in /root/bin, and perms executable as suggested. I've also made the
appropriate /etc/rulesdujour/config file
I've been manually updating 8-9 rulesets every couple of months and, with
Bayes, get great results. Now I'd like to use rules_du_jour. rules_du_jour
is in /root/bin, and perms executable as suggested. I've also made the
appropriate /etc/rulesdujour/config file.
However, when I t
100 matches
Mail list logo
