--On Sunday, March 14, 2021 1:23 PM +1000 Simon Wilson
wrote:
You've not stated your OS but on a RHEL/CentOS 7 box the correct way to
remove is to go to /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d and delete
sought.conf.
RHEL bugzilla for the issue:
- Message from a...@onet.eu -
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:16:25 +0100
From: a...@onet.eu
Subject: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Hi,
I'm getting this from cron since two days:
channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org
Sought rules have been deprecated at least 5 years ago.
you can remove that part of the config.
h2h
Axb
On 3/12/21 1:16 PM, a...@onet.eu wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this from cron since two days:
channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org' record found, channel failed
11-Mar-2021 05:46:59:
Hi,
I'm getting this from cron since two days:
channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org' record found, channel failed
11-Mar-2021 05:46:59: SpamAssassin: Unknown error code 3 from sa-update
ls /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/
sought_rules_yerp_org
sought_rules_yerp_org.cf
updates_spamassassin_org
On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:50, Kevin Walton wrote:
Hi
I am running:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2
sa-update version svn917659
This is an unsupported obsolete version of SpamAssassin. If you are
maintaining your own installation, you should update. If you are using a
distribution maintained by
Hi
I am running:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2
sa-update version svn917659
and I have been getting the following error for the last couple of days now
when cron runs sa-update:
"
config: invalid expression for rule T_MIXED_ES: "( __LOWER_E > 20 ) && (
__E_LIKE_LETTER >
( (__LOWER_E * 14 ) /
On 01/30/2018 07:22 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 01/30/2018 06:46 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Just spotted by others,
this diff fixes the problem:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
Btw:
what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
Latest
On 01/30/2018 06:46 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Just spotted by others,
this diff fixes the problem:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
Btw:
what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been
On 1/30/2018 7:46 AM, Alex wrote:
Now I see this check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers function was
just added to the 3.4 branch in the last few days.
Yes, whoever added the rule needs to be more careful. Not saying names
(or initials :-) ).
Regards,
KAM
Hi,
>> Just spotted by others,
>> this diff fixes the problem:
>> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
>
>> Btw:
>> what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
>>
>> from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
>> Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released!
>>
>> I
Hello Giovanni,
On 01/30/2018 12:55 PM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 01/30/18 12:43, A. Schulze wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update:
>>
>> rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
>> (Can't locate object method
Hi,
> Just spotted by others,
> this diff fixes the problem:
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
> Btw:
> what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
>
> from: http://spamassassin.apache.org/:
> Latest News | 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released!
>
> I didn't
Giovanni Bechis:
Just spotted by others,
this diff fixes the problem:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
yea! but that's a patch for the rules, right?
may we expect a fixed ruleset will be published shortly?
Andreas
Btw:
what's the state of 3.4.2+? Beta? Release?
On 01/30/18 12:43, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update:
>
> rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
> (Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via
> package
Hello all,
shortly (since around 09:30 UTC) I get such notifications on sa-update:
rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers"
via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1277) line 253.
)
channel:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote:
Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update
Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per
On Tue, June 9, 2009 17:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I have a CentOS 5.3 system with everything installed from the repos and
my @INC looks exactly the same, so I don't necessarily see a problem
with the versions here.
problem is that some users of yum, rpm, and friends forget to make
reinstall of
/sa-update line 81.
Any ideas please?
pete
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23921654.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 03:30 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of
setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message
when I ran it manually:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update service
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:30:59 -0700 (PDT), snowweb pe...@snowweb.co.uk
wrote:
I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of
setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message
when I ran it manually:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update service
On Mon, June 8, 2009 12:55, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
It may also be worth running spamassassin --lint -D to see if you
are missing any other packages.
you have currently 2 perl versions installed
this is the problem, if not all modules exists in 5.8.8, but some only
does in 5.8.6
--
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923079.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923139.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 03:30 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of
setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error
message when I ran it manually:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update service
Nigel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923296.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
installed from the distribution?
- do you have perl installed from the distribution?
- don't you have incorrectly set environment variable PERL5LIB set
somewhere
in startup/config files?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923417.html
Sent from
do you have?
- do you have spamassassin installed from the distribution?
- do you have perl installed from the distribution?
- don't you have incorrectly set environment variable PERL5LIB set
somewhere
in startup/config files?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update
-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
Any ideas please?
pete
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error-tp23921654p23923677.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list
) at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
Any ideas please?
You need to install Archive-Tar .
You can either use cpan or http://search.cpan.org .
pete
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error
On 08.06.09 06:04, snowweb wrote:
Guys, thanks to you all. You're all the most helpful people I've come across
online!
I think Stefan-Michael Guenther fixed it when he emailed me and told me to
run this:
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Archive::Tar
Now when I type sa-update, although I
On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:27, snowweb wrote:
Sorry for my ignorance. I'm very new to Linux. Which missing perl module
is that please?
there is non missing, you just have another perl version that miss it, how
to resolve problem with 2 versions of perl with yum i dont know, but solve
this and the
On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:30, snowweb wrote:
When I do which perl it only returns,
/usr/bin/perl
unsure if thats relayted
doesn't this mean that I only have one installed? (I'm not arguing.. just
trying to understand, since I'm new to Linux).
spamassassin 21 -D --lint
grep 5.8 on it
if
On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote:
Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update
Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per
l5/site_perl/5.8.8
On Mon, June 8, 2009 15:04, snowweb wrote:
so I guess it's fixed.
until next time there is a new perl version yes :/
newer mix CPAN with a RPM system !
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On Mon, June 8, 2009 15:26, The Doctor wrote:
You can either use cpan or http://search.cpan.org .
bad advise !
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:39 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
does there exists a perl-cleanup in you distro ?
There's not a general one. On the assumption (true for Fedora) that both
Perl and SA are distro supported packages, if I was tackling this I'd do
the following:
- make safety copies of SA
On Tue, June 9, 2009 00:59, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:39 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
does there exists a perl-cleanup in you distro ?
There's not a general one. On the assumption (true for Fedora) that both
Perl and SA are distro supported packages, if I was tackling
On 8-Jun-2009, at 16:50, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, June 8, 2009 15:26, The Doctor wrote:
You can either use cpan or http://search.cpan.org .
bad advise !
First off, it's 'advice' (the noun) in this case, not 'advise' (the
verb).
Second off, there is absolutely nothing wrong with
On Tue, June 9, 2009 03:48, LuKreme wrote:
Second off, there is absolutely nothing wrong with using CPAN.
OP problem is mix of CPAN and RPM, he dont need both to solve it
CPAN is usefull if one makes RPM with it, but most belive its better just
to follow guides and use CPAN shells, when distro
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SA-update-error-tp16722774p16722774.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dennis Clark wrote:
Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran SA-update -D
using the default channel of updates.spamassassin.org, received error new version
is 585884, skipped channel.
What exactly is going wrong here. Has the sa update default channel been
Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran
SA-update -D using the default channel of updates.spamassassin.org, received
error new version is 585884, skipped channel.
What exactly is going wrong here. Has the sa update default channel been
changed?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:18:02PM -0800, Dennis Clark wrote:
Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months. Ran
SA-update -D using the default channel of updates.spamassassin.org, received
error new version is 585884, skipped channel.
What exactly is going wrong
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2008 3:18 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SA-update error
Using Spamassassin 3.1.8. I haven't updated SA in about six months.
Ran
SA-update -D using the default channel
Hey guys..
We're seeing the same thing.. although slightly different.. this error has
only been happening for a week or so now.. everything's been fine before
that.. it seems to be with the RSA key generated on 15Jan..
An sa-update -D shows :
[/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin]# sa-update -D
Steve Monkhouse wrote:
Hey guys..
We're seeing the same thing.. although slightly different..
Not really the same thing. In the OPs case he wasn't using the key for
the channel. In your case, your (I assume) recently updated version of
GPG refuses to use the non-cross-certified key.
this
Kevin -- I have bad news. ;) that's not coming from our channels,
it's the sare.sa-update.dostech.net channel I'd guess.
--j.
Kevin W. Gagel writes:
- Original Message -
hi Kevin -- what's the channel and command line?
Hi Justin,
Thanks for looking into this. I've copied and
Justin Mason wrote:
Kevin -- I have bad news. ;) that's not coming from our channels,
it's the sare.sa-update.dostech.net channel I'd guess.
Hey, why's that bad news! :)
Kevin W. Gagel writes:
Thanks for looking into this. I've copied and pasted everything below so
that you have a
Hi
can anyone help me with this?
I think its the archive::tar which makes problems,
so i installed a newer version, but the error remains...
[23086] dbg: channel: populating temp content file
[23086] dbg: channel: file verification passed, testing update
[23086] dbg: channel: extracting archive
Hi
can anyone help me with this?
I think its the archive::tar which makes problems,
so i installed a newer version, but the error remains...
[23086] dbg: channel: populating temp content file
[23086] dbg: channel: file verification passed, testing update
[23086] dbg: channel: extracting
@spamassassin.apache.org
Thema
Re: sa-update error
Hi
can anyone help me with this?
I think its the archive::tar which makes problems,
so i installed a newer version, but the error remains...
[23086] dbg: channel: populating temp content file
[23086] dbg: channel: file verification passed, testing update
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
Philipp Snizek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06.12.2007 14:07
An
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Thema
Re: sa-update error
Hi
can anyone help me with this?
I think its the archive::tar which makes
and copied the files from my private machine .-)
Jürgen Böhm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04.12.2007 06:26
An
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie
Thema
[Fwd: Re: sa-update error]
- Nachricht von Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] auf
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:14:32 -0500 -
An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
users
.-)
Jürgen Böhm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04.12.2007 06:26
An
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie
Thema
[Fwd: Re: sa-update error]
- Nachricht von Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] auf
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:14:32 -0500 -
An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Okay thx for the help with my sa-update problem yesterday.
now i am a step further and get the next error .-)
Here is the Dump, error is at the end
[1722] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[1722] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[1722] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
[1722] dbg:
Hi
i get following error when i run sa-update.
uery failed: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = answer section incomplete
can anybody help me with this?
here is the whole dump from sa-update:
[31625] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[31625] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[31625] dbg: generic:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i get following error when i run sa-update.
uery failed: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = answer section incomplete
can anybody help me with this?
here is the whole dump from sa-update:
I'm getting the proper response from all five of our name servers.
Try the query
Sg wrote:
Hi
I am using SA 3.1.7. I want to update it.
I tried this command
sa-update --nogpg --channel updates.spamassassin.org
http://updates.spamassassin.org --channel saupdates.openprotect.com
http://saupdates.openprotect.com
But i got this error Argument 1.26_01 isnt numeric in
Hello,
I'd be glad for your suggestions re sa-update error.
$ sa-update
can't resolve l27.0.0.1 to address at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm line
751.
I think the issue started when I switched from my ISP DNS server to using
my own caching name server
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I'd be glad for your suggestions re sa-update error.
$ sa-update
can't resolve l27.0.0.1 to address at
L27.0.0.1 isn't quite the same as 127.0.0.1.
Daryl
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm line
751.
I think the issue started
Hi Daryl,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:56:02 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I'd be glad for your suggestions re sa-update error.
$ sa-update
can't resolve l27.0.0.1 to address at
L27.0.0.1 isn't quite the same as 127.0.0.1.
Well, I'm
Hi
I am using SA 3.1.7. I want to update it.
I tried this command
sa-update --nogpg --channel updates.spamassassin.org --channel
saupdates.openprotect.com
But i got this error Argument 1.26_01 isnt numeric in subroutine entry
at sa-update line 91
--
Sg
/vendor_perl) at
/usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
Can someone help me what went wrong? ans how to solve this problem.
TIA
Diptanjan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error%3A-tf3882174.html#a11002931
Sent
diptanjan wrote:
Hi Friends,
I have installed spamassassin few days back. using CPAN.
I gave the following command
# perl -MCPAN -e shell[as root]
cpano conf prerequisites_policy ask
cpaninstall Mail::SpamAssassin
cpanquit
spamassassin -V gives me
-update error.
Thanks again
Diptanjan
###
Perhaps you haven't installed Archive::Tar (or IO::Zlib) as noted in the
INSTALL doc.
Daryl
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-error%3A-tf3882174.html#a11005804
Sent from
Hello spamassassin-users,
Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake
# sa-update
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf: asn_lookup
asn.routeviews.org _ASN_ _ASNCIDR_
channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed
What is wrong?
I
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello spamassassin-users,
Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake
# sa-update
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf: asn_lookup
asn.routeviews.org _ASN_ _ASNCIDR_
channel: lint check of update failed, channel
Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello spamassassin-users,
Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake
# sa-update
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf: asn_lookup
asn.routeviews.org
Jim Knuth wrote:
Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello spamassassin-users,
Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake
# sa-update
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/tmp/.spamassassin4363HNOBtxtmp/25_asn.cf: asn_lookup
Heute (13.04.2007/02:56 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
Jim Knuth wrote:
Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello spamassassin-users,
Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake
# sa-update
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
Jim Knuth wrote:
Heute (13.04.2007/02:56 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
Jim Knuth wrote:
Heute (13.04.2007/02:29 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello spamassassin-users,
Since the Upgrade on Debian Etch I receive this mistake
# sa-update
config: failed to parse line,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:26:09PM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
eval { use Net::DNS; };
Just curious, what version of perl are you using?
5.8.0
Interesting. I have no idea what would cause perl to generate that
John Andersen wrote:
Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines:
Only from cron?
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in
You have to install these package via CPAN.
John Andersen ha scritto:
Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines:
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:19:37AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
[...]
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 95.
eval { use Net::DNS; };
[...]
eval { use IO::Zlib 1.04; };
Just curious,
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 08:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:19:37AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
[...]
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 95.
eval { use
continuing with the pop-posting
They are installed Simone.
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.11
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.58
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: MIME::Base64, version 3.07
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed:
Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines:
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
On Thursday 03 August 2006 10:17 am, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to
continue anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:25:04AM -0500, Chris wrote:
Aha! I see the issue! Crap!
Theo, why would you get this if the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001004 'does'
exist?
The problem is, yet again, of assumption. The code assumes that if the
update directory exists, that certain channel files
On Friday 04 August 2006 9:33 am, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
The problem is, yet again, of assumption. The code assumes that if the
update directory exists, that certain channel files will be in there
because it creates them (aka: channel.cf and channel.pre). So when an
update occurs, the code
Hi All,
I ran sa-update across several Centos 64 32 bit machines here
yesterday and today and received the following error...
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue
anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue
anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be concerned?
Hrm. Well, it's one of those features as opposed to
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:06:31 -0400, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue
anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue
anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be concerned?
I don't use updatedir - just straight sa-update.
85 matches
Mail list logo
