they mean microsoft equipment... :)
-Original Message-
From: Andy Jezierski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 3:13 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Uptime was [scan times up!]
Ken Goods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2004 04:50:30 PM
And I hope you're taking that opportunity to update IOS on it as well.
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 05:58 pm, Nate Schindler wrote:
A sad day is coming on Thursday, I have to re-boot a router at one of our
remote locations to install a new card.
I always loved showing this to people who
-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM
To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: scan times up!
-Original Message-
From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM
-Original Message-
From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: scan times up!
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
If anyone remembers this thread, I have more feedback.
After
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: scan times up!
I haven't been reading this list for a couple of weeks
: scan times up!
-Original Message-
From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: scan times up!
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
If anyone remembers this thread, I have more
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2004
03:48:57 PM:
Good grief NO! You read this wrong. I'm running it on a system that
archeologists are interested in! I think the Boston Computer museum left
me
a message wanting to take the system away! Hell I'm running on a system
that
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, scohen wrote:
Thanks for the reply. So what's with the SA eats all my memory thread and
the memory footprint thread? Those two threads and your Scan times up
thread makes it seem that there are problems.
I think there's a problem with spamd and memory use, and we've
Andy Jezierski scribbled on Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:31 PM:
There's never anything wrong with going on an archeological dig in the
computer room. I'm sometimes asked What's that relic in the
corner? Does
it actually have a hard drive? and people are amazed when I tell them
That's what's
Ken Goods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2004 04:50:30 PM:
Spamassassin, and ClamAV. It is currently processing 5 to 8 thousand
emails
a day and has been up for 68 days. Here's a current snapshot of top:
A sad day is coming on Thursday, I have to re-boot a router at one of our
remote
Chris Santerre wrote to Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail):
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x2.7 seconds
3.0 30.4 seconds
OH MY! Network test :)
Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;)
:-)
Others have pointed out some possible causes. I did fairly extensive
testing
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x 2.7 seconds
3.0 30.4 seconds
OH MY! Network test :)
Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;)
Have you got a local (on-site, preferably on-machine) DNS cache ?
: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM
To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: scan times up!
-Original Message-
From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: Re: scan times up!
On Thu
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x2.7 seconds
3.0 30.4 seconds
OH MY! Network test :)
Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:23 PM
To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: Re: scan times up!
At 05:10 PM 9/30/2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x2.7 seconds
3.0
Chris Santerre wrote:
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x2.7 seconds
3.0 30.4 seconds
OH MY! Network test :)
Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;)
My time is up a little since upgrading, but not that much. I also
upgraded the hardware on the machine though too,
16 matches
Mail list logo