Great! -- thank you!
I appreciate all advice ... and will start reading
Thanks
Russ
Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/10 19:12, EACSI Support wrote:
That sound great!
We are using PostFix
Thank You
Russ
Ah, great.
Here's a couple guides I wrote for greylisting and postfix restricti
On 11/1/2010 3:10 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 01/11/10 13:17, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote:
>>
>>> Suggestions will be appreciated.
>>
>> You want to do things at SMTP time to reduce your email volume.
>>
>> Greylisting has been suggested; I see good results from it h
On 01/11/10 19:12, EACSI Support wrote:
That sound great!
We are using PostFix
Thank You
Russ
Ah, great.
Here's a couple guides I wrote for greylisting and postfix restrictions.
They are based on CentOS, but the principles are no different for Ubuntu.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/post
That sounds great!
We are using PostFix ...
Thanks
Russ
Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/10 13:17, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote:
Suggestions will be appreciated.
You want to do things at SMTP time to reduce your email volume.
Greylisting has been suggested; I s
That sound great!
We are using PostFix
Thank You
Russ
Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/11/10 13:17, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote:
Suggestions will be appreciated.
You want to do things at SMTP time to reduce your email volume.
Greylisting has been suggested; I se
On 01/11/10 13:17, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote:
Suggestions will be appreciated.
You want to do things at SMTP time to reduce your email volume.
Greylisting has been suggested; I see good results from it here.
Rejecting messages that do not have a FDQN in the H
EACSI Support wrote:
> The system commonly runs 2 to 3 connections to spamd with a maximum of
> 5, but when the email load gets high, it only seems to give two
> connections to spamd for the 1 user that is receiving the highest
> amount of eMail (8,000 per day).
>
> The problem is that the eMail
On 11/1/2010 2:26 PM, EACSI Support wrote:
>
> I read up on processing at SMTP time & GreyListing and it sounds
> effective.
If you are not already doing so, I would highly recommend using the
zen.spamhaus.org blacklist at the SMTP level. It will block a large
chunk of spam before SA even has to
I have had many helpful responses and I appreciate it.
Some simple answers :
The system is a "Linode 512" which is a virtual server hosted on a larger system
of which I don't have the true specifications. Howerver, it runs as a 4
CPU/Core system with 512M of memory.
I am looking at adding m
Theodoros V. Kalamatianos wrote:
> You keep mentioning SA throughput statistics, but you do not mention
> at all how your server fares load-wise. If your CPU(s) is(are) at 100%
> or your system is swapping a lot then simply raising the number of SA
> processes will not really help.
>
>> The syste
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote:
I have an Ubuntu Linux server running SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4 running
on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.008). I have at least one
account that is having to process from 250 - 400 emails, 99% spam, per HOUR.
This works out to be a
On 11/1/2010 12:59 AM, Russ Sanders wrote:
> I have an Ubuntu Linux server running SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4
> running
> on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.008). I have at least one
> account that is having to process from 250 - 400 emails, 99% spam, per HOUR.
> This works
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Russ Sanders wrote:
The system is a basic Linode running Ubuntu Linux 8.04 with 512M of memory.
Any way to add more RAM?
Suggestions will be appreciated.
You want to do things at SMTP time to reduce your email volume.
Greylisting has been suggested; I see good results
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 04:59 +, Russ Sanders wrote:
> I have an Ubuntu Linux server running SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4
> running
> on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.008). I have at least one
> account that is having to process from 250 - 400 emails, 99% spam, per HOUR.
Russ Sanders wrote:
> I have an Ubuntu Linux server running SpamAssassin Server version
> 3.2.4 running on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.008).
> I have at least one account that is having to process from 250 - 400
> emails, 99% spam, per HOUR. This works out to be approximately 8
I have an Ubuntu Linux server running SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4 running
on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.008). I have at least one
account that is having to process from 250 - 400 emails, 99% spam, per HOUR.
This works out to be approximately 8,000 emails per day. The sp
16 matches
Mail list logo
